Posted on 06/20/2008 5:36:39 PM PDT by forkinsocket
Speaking strictly for myself, and just myself, To me it does not matter if God created an evolutionary system, or if He created man as a entity apart from the rest of creation, just so long as God's hand is recognized in creation.
I really think it makes much more sense than Dawkins theory of "Seeding by space aliens." Because frankly Dawkins never explained where the aliens came from. In other words the uncaused cause.
Okay, so the evolution theory backs up the Genesis account of the order of things.
“Okay, so the evolution theory backs up the Genesis account of the order of things.”
Yes, so it’s not exactly original.
Heresy! Heresy!
All part of moving in mysterious ways his wonders to perform.
“The question isn’t ‘why not evolution,’ the question is simply, why.”
Fair enough. Evolution is a unified theory that explains everything. It’s elegance comes from the idea that once it was set in motion, all that we know would come to pass by it’s inherent genius.
Other theories suggest that God designed everything one way and then stepped in later to add humanity. why not give God credit to get it right the first time?
"With the exception of the cross-burning episode. … I believe John Freshwater is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district,"
It's like the old joke "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"
Seriously, "With the exception of the cross burning episode"??? ..... Unbelievable.
There are many evolution books written by evolutionists which present evolution as a cosmic process--far more than just changes in existing forms of life. And in the very same post you write:
One can see Evolution in Genesis as the Universe and our planet are taken from nothing and progress through light, consolidation of matter, oceans, simple life to the complex life of today.From which we can deduce that, at least to you, evolution is far more than just changes in existing forms of life, but is precisely the sort of doctrine which you say it isn't.
They go bonkers at the thought that GOD explains the origin of life.
Evos claim they are not concerned with how it all began! Yet, Darwin wrote about Origins, didn't he? Does that not have something to do with how it STARTS...?
"...his point is illustrated in the second half of the entry by looking at current debates in the philosophy of evolutionary biology on these five themes, with a special focus on Stephen Jay Gould's The Structure of Evolutionary Theory." -Stanford Encyclopedia of PHILOSOPHY(online)
Darwin wrote on the origin of species not the origin of life. His meaning of origin was to explain how one species evolved into another. I challange you to show me where he wrote to explained the origin of life.
No life, no evolution! Of course, your religion doesn't need that part...
I can hear the choir now..."there is no god, there is no god...lalalalalala..."with fingers in ears!
From: Answers.com
Origin
or·i·gin (ôr'ə-jĭn, ŏr'-) pronunciation n.
1. The point at which something comes into existence or from which it derives or is derived.
Species
spe·cies (spē'shēz, -sēz) pronunciation n., pl. species.
1. Biology.
1. A fundamental category of taxonomic classification, ranking below a genus or subgenus and consisting of related organisms capable of interbreeding.
2. An organism belonging to such a category, represented in binomial nomenclature by an uncapitalized Latin adjective or noun following a capitalized genus name, as in Ananas comosus, the pineapple, and Equus caballus, the horse.
Organism
or·gan·ism (ôr'gə-nĭz'əm) pronunciation n.
1. An individual form of life, such as a plant, animal, bacterium, protist, or fungus; a body made up of organs, organelles, or other parts that work together to carry on the various processes of life.
2. A system regarded as analogous in its structure or functions to a living body: the social organism
They go bonkers at the thought that the Theory of Evolution explains the origin of life. LRM #50
No, actually some of go "bonkers' when we read such suppositions spoken as proven truth. Show me the proof, not some "foot bones connected to da' ankle bones, dem bones, dem bones, dem bones..."
1: Related ArticlesTorres AG.The cad locus of Enterobacteriaceae: More than just lysine decarboxylation.Anaerobe. 2008 May 17. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18572426 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
2: Related ArticlesFilée J, Chandler M.Convergent mechanisms of genome evolution of large and giant DNA viruses.Res Microbiol. 2008 May 10. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18572389 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
3: Related ArticlesHare JL, Brown JK, Marwick TH.Association of myocardial strain with left ventricular geometry and progression of hypertensive heart disease.Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;102(1):87-91. Epub 2008 May 9.PMID: 18572042 [PubMed - in process]
4: Related ArticlesSiomi MC, Saito K, Siomi H.How selfish retrotransposons are silenced in Drosophila germline and somatic cells.FEBS Lett. 2008 Jun 19. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18572018 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
5: Related ArticlesMeinersmann RJ, Romero-Gallo J, Blaser MJ.Rate heterogeneity in the evolution of Helicobacter pylori and the behavior of homoplastic sites.Infect Genet Evol. 2008 Apr 18. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18571992 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
6: Related ArticlesIllera JC, Richardson DS, Helm B, Atienza JC, Emerson BC.Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography and speciation in the avian genus Saxicola.Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 May 20. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18571939 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
7: Related ArticlesRodríguez-Serrano E, Palma RE, Hernández CE.The evolution of ecomorphological traits within the Abrothrichini (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): A bayesian phylogenetics approach.Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 May 14. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18571938 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
8: Related ArticlesEichler FS, Ren JQ, Cossoy M, Rietsch AM, Nagpal S, Moser AB, Frosch MP, Ransohoff RM.Is microglial apoptosis an early pathogenic change in cerebral X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy?Ann Neurol. 2008 Jun 20;63(6):729-742. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18571777 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
9: Related ArticlesWang FY, Chung WS, Yan HY, Tzeng CS.Adaptive evolution of cone opsin genes in two colorful cyprinids, Opsariichthys pachycephalus and Candidia barbatus.Vision Res. 2008 Jun 19. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18571688 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
10: Related ArticlesEnquist M, Ghirlanda S, Jarrick A, Wachtmeister CA.Why does human culture increase exponentially?Theor Popul Biol. 2008 May 10. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 18571686 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Do you ask the same of other sciences--do you demand that the scientists studying gravity explain where mass came from? Or that astronomers explain where hydrogen came from before you accept their silly theories about how the sun works?
I do not accept TOE as a valid science. I look at it solely as a philosophy, which devotes itself to worship of man, and attempts to disprove God (which is denied, of course).
It is no different than a religion, as it stands. It requires blind faith in nothing, because that is the assumption at it's base, ie: Something came from nothing, started life from an accident, and advanced from a single cell through untold myriads of "transition phases" (which can't seem to be found, quite yet, but we're looking hard!) to become a man, and/or every other specie or single-celled organism still on earth.
TOE requires quite a leap of faith, since science is demonstrable (even in theory), and explains to us how mass and hydrogen can be measured. Science fiction tells us that life came from nothing, or that aliens (where did the aliens come from?) plopped some life onto earth, or whatever else the EVOs say they don't need to explain. Arthur Clarke, Robert Heinlin, etal were quite interesting in my youthful studies, but I figured out that not everything they posited was a truth.
You can't demonstrate your theory of evolution. You could admit you are auditing God's kingdom, and speculating natural causes (but, that would be so wrong, to one looking in God's face and spitting), since every smart person knows "there is no god, there is no god, there is no god...lalalalalalala..." and everybody else is just a dumb superstitious yokel.
The problem with your scenario, is that most of us aren't that dumb! Science is repeatable... or didn't you get the memo?
Imagine where the United States might be if all the brains, money, and talent which has been wasted in pursuit of “evolutionary biology” had been put to rational and decent purposes?
That's why it's important for evolutionists to insist on the indoctrination of students. Indoctrination leaves no room for debate, discussion, or objectivity. Socialists love this type of educational agenda.
Ha ha! Yeah, maybe we wouldn't have sequenced the human genome in the U.S.A., maybe we wouldn't be the center of research in biotechnology, maybe we wouldn’t be saving lives with groundbreaking treatments, maybe we wouldn't be breaking new ground with gene-mod crops feeding the world. Sure. Evolutionary biology is both rational and decent.
I guess I didn't. Make sure to copy me on the one when they repeat the ignition of the sun, okay? Wouldn't want to miss that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.