Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Kennedy was our friend: RFK - supporter of Israel murdered by Arab terrorist
THE JERUSALEM POST ^ | Jun. 4, 2008 | LENNY BEN-DAVID

Posted on 06/04/2008 6:01:29 PM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2008 6:01:29 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The RAT Party hadn't begun to openly display its contempt for Israel when Kennedy was alive.If he was alive today he'd be every bit as hostile to Israel as is Jimmah,Ramsey Clark or any other worthless RAT.
2 posted on 06/04/2008 6:04:55 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Will the dancing Hitlers please wait in the wings? We're only seeing singing Hitlers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock; dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

Nor should be forget Ambassador Cleo Noel and and Charges d'Affair George Moore, murdered in 1973 by Yasser Arafat, 2nd in charge Abu "Peace Partner" Mazen, in an attempt to free Sirhan Sirhan.

Cleo A. Noel, Jr. - United States Ambassador
 
Who Murdered Cleo Noel?-Why does State Dept cover up Arafat's role in murdering a US diplomat
 
 

Interestingly, the two threads linked have zero posts.

3 posted on 06/04/2008 6:05:41 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
The RAT Party hadn't begun to openly display its contempt for Israel when Kennedy was alive.If he was alive today he'd be every bit as hostile to Israel as is Jimmah,Ramsey Clark or any other worthless RAT.

No, you've nothing to base that on. Neither party was particularly supportive of Israel at the time, support was expected to come from Europe. That's what made RFK stand out. And what got him killed. It's not a party thing, Nixon recognized the grave errors Ike made in the region, and changed his outlook too.

4 posted on 06/04/2008 6:08:35 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I respect RFK for this stand he took and respect him for taking on the mob.


5 posted on 06/04/2008 6:23:58 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I respect RFK for this stand he took and respect him for taking on the mob.

I agree on both counts, Vietnam, the issue he ran on, a different story.

6 posted on 06/04/2008 6:27:32 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

RFK by today’s standards would be like what we have seen in folks such as Joe Leiberman or Zell Miller, the conservitive Dems the radical left in the present day Dem party has chased out.


7 posted on 06/04/2008 6:27:45 PM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Bookmark for later read.


8 posted on 06/04/2008 6:28:10 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

In truth, the gunning down of RFK was the REAL first jihadi attack on America, years before 9/11.


9 posted on 06/04/2008 6:30:43 PM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I often refer to his murder, rather than the better known early 70s attacks. Of cours jihadists have been attacking American for centuries, the west for a millenia. But in retrospect RFK’s murder was significant. But no one looks back to it.


10 posted on 06/04/2008 6:33:12 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl; Pelham
In truth, the gunning down of RFK was the REAL first jihadi attack on America, years before 9/11.

Sirhan Sirhan was a Muslim?
11 posted on 06/04/2008 6:38:30 PM PDT by Das Outsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Jihad? He was a Christian.


12 posted on 06/04/2008 6:39:59 PM PDT by forkinsocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

You can’t really call this a jihadi attack, since Sirhan was a Christian. Churches he attended at various times include Maronite, Baptist and Seventh Day Adventist. He also had an interest in the occult.

At any rate, he wasn’t a Muslim.


13 posted on 06/04/2008 6:41:52 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"He was killed by an Arab [Sirhan Sirhan] because of his support for Israel Sirhan was into the mob for a lot of money, and they wanted Bobby to be another good Kennedy."

There, I fixed it.

14 posted on 06/04/2008 6:42:16 PM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider

Arab Christian, there were a number of Christian terrorists at the time, most prominent the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, still around though now Muslim. Marxist organizations, as are all (?-am I missing anyone) of the Arab terrorist groups. Big on hijacking and airport attacks. Arab terrorist would be better than jihadist in describing Sirhan, same motivation, but Christians have gotten out of the business, so I’m not sure there’s much harm. And as I noted, it was Arafat killing American diplomats to free him.


15 posted on 06/04/2008 6:43:54 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
Sirhan was into the mob for a lot of money, and they wanted Bobby to be another good Kennedy

Perhaps, we won't know, but it was Yasser Arafat who attempted to free him. And that wasn't about the mob, it was about Sirhan's good deed.

16 posted on 06/04/2008 6:45:38 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan; forkinsocket; Biggirl

See 11, he was an Arab terrorist. No, not a jihadist, but from the perspective of motivation, not much different.


17 posted on 06/04/2008 6:46:59 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

True, from US history, there was the famous Barbary pirates attack, a bit of it recalled in the offical US Marine song. But in the more contempary sense, what happened 40 years ago this week, really brought jihadi attacks front and center. Plus this and what Hilary said a few weeks back could bring in new interest in a movie called “Bobby” about people in that hotel that RFK got shot talking about the things leading up to it. Bookmarked for futher reading.


18 posted on 06/04/2008 6:47:48 PM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
RFK'S WORDS also serve as a rejoinder to anti-Israel propagandists today. Some revisionists claim that the Jews of the Yishuv outnumbered and outgunned the Arabs in Palestine. Kennedy's eye-witness account is different

The revisionists are right. (In this case.) Trained, armed Jews about 35,000. Trained, armed Arabs about 23,000.

In addition, the Jews were fighting on interior lines and had a consolidated command structure. The Arabs had the exterior lines and were about as uncoordinated as can be imagined, with at least six or seven groups, none of whom were really communicating with each other.

The theory that RFK, a guy from out of town, had any way to accurately compare total Arab to total Jewish forces is silly.

19 posted on 06/04/2008 6:49:14 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
I agree, but it didn't bring it front and center, but it should have.

But you should call them Arab terrorists, not jihadists, you're confusing people since Sirhan was a similarly motivated Christian.

No difference in my mind, terrorists are terrorists.

20 posted on 06/04/2008 6:50:52 PM PDT by SJackson (It is impossible to build a peace process based on blood, Natan Sharansky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson