Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

La Nina and Pacific Decadal Oscillation Cool the Pacific (global warming)
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/images.php3?img_id=18012 ^

Posted on 04/30/2008 3:23:03 AM PDT by chessplayer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: LilyBean

I lived North of 60 for decades — I still laugh at Victorians’ reaction to a bit of snow (although they are now “fellow Victorians’). I actually don’t mind seasons.


41 posted on 04/30/2008 2:39:11 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Here’s a link about the PDO that I posted on FR last November

Thanks! You were right!

I can't understand why Canada wants a new global warming tax. If warming happens Canada stands to benefit immensely. What makes them want to pointlessly cut off their own nose to spite America?

42 posted on 04/30/2008 6:53:17 PM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
“I can't understand why Canada wants a new global warming tax.”

Neither do I — except for political expediency. The first goal of any politician is to get reelected & the MSM has brainwashed a lot of people into fearing AGW.

In the far north, where I used to live; when asked about global warming, most people would respond: “bring it on!”.

Most of the country was buried under an ice sheet over a mile thick, for tens of thousands of years. A little bit of global cooling would be far, far worse for us than even a lot of global warming.

We have a “carbon tax” here in B.C. now — brought in by our right-of-centre coalition provincial government (right of our centre that is). Some members of the government are probably true believers — for the rest, I think that they just wanted to neutralize the issue politically. It's actually proven to be a brilliant move — because the Opposition(socialist) NDP has come out against it, while the Green Party can only sputter that they thought of it first.

Meanwhile, the tax has introduced a little reality into the whole global warming debate. Most people used to think that a combination of good intentions and low-wattage light bulbs would solve the “problem” — or perhaps that, along with more transit buses, and eating less meat. (These are all suggestions from letters to the editor.) Now, people realize that this madness is going to cost actual money & they are becoming more skeptical. I call the tax the “least-bad” solution — because at least a tax leaves us with more choices than the alternative bans and mandates; plus it is transparent.

43 posted on 04/30/2008 7:56:01 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

“Global warming” hoax BUMP!


44 posted on 04/30/2008 7:59:41 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
According to Josh Willis, JPL oceanographer and climate scientist, “These natural climate phenomena can sometimes hide global warming caused by human activities. Or they can have the opposite effect of accentuating it.”

Whoa Josh...really sticking your neck out there

Truly a man confident of his science and its predictive ability.

45 posted on 04/30/2008 8:01:23 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson