Skip to comments.
Legal aid group challenges state's FLDS placement plan (FLDS)
GO San Angelo ^
| April 24, 2008
| Staff
Posted on 04/24/2008 11:48:06 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
The legal process continues in spite of the fear of many on FR.
To: colorcountry; Pan_Yans Wife; MHGinTN; Colofornian; Elsie; FastCoyote; Osage Orange; Greg F; ...
2
posted on
04/24/2008 11:49:38 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
To: greyfoxx39
Now, if the "families" of the children would like to present themselves in court........
The Legal Aid Society doesn't have a clue.
3
posted on
04/24/2008 11:51:41 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: greyfoxx39
Just a reminder (I know that you are aware of this, but others might not be), the pro-CPS folks have set up a daily thread, and have asked ALL posters to not post these articles separately, but instead to put them in that thread.
I don’t care for daily threads much, but since that’s what most people who posted over there said they liked, I’m trying to help out.
I guess you didn’t like the idea, because you posted this out here instead (I think this is already posted in the daily thread).
To: greyfoxx39
I sure hope the fathers appear in court to present their case as to why they should get their children back.
5
posted on
04/24/2008 11:52:44 AM PDT
by
Virginia Ridgerunner
("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
To: CharlesWayneCT
Wow. I hadn’t even thought of this as pro-CPS. I thought the issue was the welfare of the children, period.
To: greyfoxx39
Do you know of any other case of a state taking away children from their parents without the parents having their day in court??? Sorry that is not legal under the constitution of our nation. It's that simple.
Now they are finding that they didn't have probable cause for the warrant. The call was lie and it appears that they knew when it was made that it came from Colorado and not Texas.
Get you popcorn and watch as it is proven that all citizens of this nation have rights not just those that you agree with.
To: greyfoxx39
The legal process continues in spite of the fear of many on FR. Yeah.....due process frightens many of us here on FR. /s
8
posted on
04/24/2008 12:04:46 PM PDT
by
beltfed308
(Heller: The defining moment of our Republic)
To: CharlesWayneCT
Nonsense; if we are to run the site this way then one would have to read through the numbingly-long thread each day for an update - might as well hide Easter eggs in a haystack.
Breaking news needs to be read apart from the same old hash.
9
posted on
04/24/2008 12:07:26 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: CharlesWayneCT; MizSterious; Politicalmom
I was instrumental in helping the Daily Thread by MysSterious get started. Your statement "the pro-CPS folks have set up a daily thread, and have asked ALL posters to not post these articles separately, but instead to put them in that thread." is pure hogwash. A development such as this is worthy of a separate thread.
I guess you didnt like the idea, because you posted this out here instead (I think this is already posted in the daily thread).
If you had bothered to look at the post in the Daily Thread you would see that I am the one who posted it to give the subject more exposure. A link to that post would have been nice, BTW, if you are going to cite it.
I would think that the fact that the appeal is going to be heard would be exciting to you, regardless of where you saw it. BTW, where are the threads YOU have posted if you are going to play thread nanny?
10
posted on
04/24/2008 12:09:29 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
To: oldenuff2no
Nice to see your PREDICTION of a hearing that hasn't happed yet....
Now they are finding that they didn't have probable cause for the warrant. Oh, REALLY? Link?
The call was lie and it appears that they knew when it was made that it came from Colorado and not Texas.
Provide a link, please. I'd REALLY like to see some proof of this.
11
posted on
04/24/2008 12:14:09 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
To: CharlesWayneCT
CPS?
What is that and if you mention another thread you should link to it. thanks
12
posted on
04/24/2008 12:18:30 PM PDT
by
visualops
(artlife.us . nature photography desktop wallpapers)
To: greyfoxx39
That's simple. LE has substantiated that the call was a fabrication and did not originate from that compound or from any member of that cult. Without the call they had insufficient probable cause for a warrant. If they would have had probable cause from other sources then they would have had that warrant long ago.
They got the warrant and made the raid because someone told them what they wanted to hear and that someone lied to them. That is now a known fact!! I'm sure you don't like it but that is where this case is headed right now.
To: visualops; MizSterious
14
posted on
04/24/2008 12:22:59 PM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
To: All
"These families have the right to have their voices heard in the legal process," said TRLA attorney Robert Doggett. "The idea that these children can be taken away without giving their families the opportunity to address allegations and fight to stay together is absurd." It's good to see someone in Texas has heard of due process!
15
posted on
04/24/2008 12:29:00 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: oldenuff2no
Regardless of the status of the original warrant, if LE observed children who have been abused, they should certainly take action to protect them. Of course, engaging in a fishing expedition by taking 400+ kids away from their families was obviously the wrong action to take.
16
posted on
04/24/2008 12:34:55 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: NYpeanut; the808bass; brytlea; pandoraou812; ricks_place; CindyDawg; Huntress; Pebcak; ...
PING!!
FReepmail to be added to the FLDS El Dorado Legal Case Ping List
17
posted on
04/24/2008 12:49:13 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(The children were taken because they were either being raised to be raped, or raised to be a rapist.)
To: CharlesWayneCT
the pro-CPS folks ********************
Who are the "pro-CPS folks"?
18
posted on
04/24/2008 12:56:45 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: greyfoxx39; All
http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/FA/content/htm/fa.005.00.000261.00.htm
This is the code. No matter what Legal Aid tries to spin, don’t give them credit for any big law dynamo. I’ve had them overturned in human services court. More than once.
I’ll say it again: it matters not whether the call was legitimate. That it was initiated made the state not only have to respond, but within a certain amount of time, too. The various types of abuse are rated and the response times are rated accordingly.
I did not see mention of due process other than the conditions for which a court hearing may be bypassed.
19
posted on
04/24/2008 12:58:45 PM PDT
by
Froufrou
To: CharlesWayneCT
>>
the pro-CPS folks have set up a daily thread,
<<
Sounds like they share the CPS mindset of command and control too.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson