Posted on 04/17/2008 10:12:04 PM PDT by Howdy there
No TV,RADIO,INTERNET was taken from interviews with females who had escaped the compound.
Warren Jeffs is in prison for Accomplice to Sex with a Minor for forcing a 16 year old girl to marry his 19 year old cousin.
If you have seen the pictures of the women at the compound, the most prominent woman in the photo has a unibrow.
Jeffs is said to have 60-75 wives. The cult practices strictly controlled inbreeding of severely retarded girls and boys.
Those girl babies who aren’t retarded, are subject to ‘Breaking the child’. A process where they hold the infant’s head under running water (yep, just like waterboarding), to starve the brain of oxygen, ensuring light brain damage.
SO.... the hunchback thing might have been an exaggeration.
“No, they’re not ‘guilty’ until they’ve been proven so in a court of law. “
Yeah. And I think they have to actually arrest someone first, before they can be brought to justice and declared guilty, or not.
“I think it is clear you have revealed yourself as an apologist for these sub-human scum.”
Actually, I think it’s clear you don’t understand what most posters, including MAMATEXAN, have been saying about this case.
Every time some thread NEWBIE gets on, and calls The informed, and experienced posters on the FLDS threads a supporter of pedophilia, it is very entertaining.
You are actually making many of us laugh, as we know what is gonna happen next.
Too bad you don’t have the experience to avoid this kind of embarrassment.
One hopes you will catch up on the latest information, and quit making such a fool of yourself.
“Seems to me we have some Jeff’s sympathizers here on fr. If not members in full.”
(see, I told you we ‘knew’ what would happen next)
I have been on these threads from the beginning. Each thread, I spend the time to read EVERY POST. One thread had over 600 posts.
NOWHERE, on those threads, have I seen any poster state or imply they condoned the bizarre practices of the FLDS.
I have seen posters showing concern that all this is being done in a legal manner.
I have seen posters who wish to get all the facts before they condemn.
BUT NO ONE SUPPORTS RAPING CHILDREN.
Not even you.
So quit saying they do, until you know more about the subject and the ‘context’ of many posters replies.
“Were there allegations of their abuse? “
read up on BREAKING THE CHILD.
(sigh)
You've been reading that dusty old Constitution thingy again, haven't you?
:-)
YEAH.
What?
No. I have read up on my RIGHTS. I went to the libary, and I got me some learning, and I know mize rights.
I lookied them up in the Declaration of End-dependence.
(or was that the Getties-Berg Add-Dress? I’ll have to check that next time ize in the libary)
/sarcasm
Main Entry:
whole cloth[...]
: pure fabrication —usually used in the phrase "out of whole cloth" (the theory was created out of whole cloth)
Thanks. I know what the dictionary says.
I was trying to explain where it originated.
Just like ‘raining cats and dogs’
and Why we say we are carrying the bride over the ‘threshold’.
Although I could be wrong.
Oh, so could I. It happened once before. :P
Come to think of it, I may be an apologist for these sub-human scum too.
An ‘advocate’ would promote, excuse, or defend this shame.
An ‘apologist’ would be sorry it happened, wish it hadn’t, support it being stopped, and want help given to the victims.
So, maybe you are right, GOST2.
Just wondered if you had seen any of the latest news, and if you question had been answered.
...and if your question had been answered.
(freeper posting debility)
Yeah. I almost had it happen once.
: )
(let's see you beat that lie!)
LOL! I know we don't always agree, but I must say your posts have provided more than one chuckle...Thanks!
---
BTW, The 'gangs' all over on the latter part of this thread:
ROTFLMAO!! Touche'. :D
not sure what latest news you are speaking of i have read quite a bit and the more i read the more questions i have some day in the future this will be in fromt a criminal court and under oath with the penalty of perjury the truth of some of this will come out.
http://www.exmormon.org/boards/w-agora/view.php?bn=exmobb_recovery&key=1208513479&newest=1208579521
looked and googled and this is all i can find on this it comes from one of the wives who left the group some time ago and not taken under oath and if this is correct it makes it sound like not only the flds but the lds practice this having known a few mormons i call bull till there is more proof not someones story
I find that the government, state or federal, through the auspices of the social welfare entitlement industry, whose model of the ideal family structure is a young, unmarried, unemployed, unskilled, illiterate female usually drug addicted and often afflicted with a sexually transmitted disease bearing multiple children out of wedlock with multiple unknown men and completely dependent upon the government; has very little or no credibility assessing the relative morality of the polygamus relationships that exist within non-mainstream Christian religious sects and denominations.
Were the polygamus organizations Islamic based instead of Christian based, the federal government wouldn’t dare think of storming their property with heavily armed SWAT teams and federal agents or seizing children and separating families, yet for the Christian based FLDS based on Bibilical belief, they do. During the 1960’s and early 70’s, ploygamus “group marriage” hippie communes in the US in which children were indiscriminately fathered by unmarried men and women witnessed no federal stormtroopers visting the entire force of the federal government upon their activities.
Again, it is crystal clear that one’s rights to practice religious expression freely as the Constitution guarantees and “separation of church and state” are contingent upon exactly who you are, not what you do even when the sake of the welfare of children are used as a pretext to violate rights and render judgements. Now the children of FLDS sects that have been seized and taken away from their families can be truly sexually assaulted and raped by a series of foster parents courtesy of the mandated government foster care system.
I knew that as soon as calls for the legalization of previously illegal and non-traditional sexual relationships, ie: homosexual unions were argued for, the floodgates for other non-traditional sexual relationships and unions would argue for identical inclusion and legitimacy based on exactly the same premises of social inclusion and freedom of choice. In the final analysis, the government set the stage for this eventuality and they deserve every condemnation from polygamists that they invited and welcomed from militant homosexual rights groups.
My posts are not an endorsement of polygamy but a endorsement of the scrupulously fair and equal treatment of all those who choose a non-traditional lifestyle. THe US government and state governments through their actions at Rudy Ridge, Waco, Texas, and these polygamus sects has clearly shown that being white, heterosexual, and Christian gets your ass stomped while being anything else gets you a pass based on nothing but pure preconceived prejudices and activist socio-political agendas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.