Posted on 03/30/2008 12:35:05 PM PDT by buccaneer81
New Mexico has always had an open carry law, as long as the firearm is visible from three sides. Along with that, a firearm can be carried concealed, providing it is empty, but the clip can be handy. A firearm can be carried concealed in an automobile, since your car is regarded as private property, like your house. We also have concealed carry now, so everyone is covered, with or without a permit. I would feel much safer, if everyone exercised their right to carry, open or concealed.
Actually there were two officers involved. If you'd actually read the article you'd know that.
And apparently the actions of these two abysmally ignorant LEO's uncovered a serious departement wide training defect.
But why let a couple of facts spoil a good knee jerk reaction on your part.
L
Some guy tried to challenge it by announcing that he was going to walk to the State Capital and go around the block with a pistol in it’s holster. He was arrested for violating the ordinance. He later ran for governor and lost.
I wish I was on that jury.
Interesting. You've gotten several responses from other posters asking where the bashing is. You've had posters tell you that you're wrong. As I said. This ONE cop was ignorant of the law. Ever heard that old saying? "Ignorance of the law is no excuse?" Well it should apply to everyone, including LEOs.
You're just making yourself look foolish here, and frankly, you don't have the intellectual honesty to admit that you're wrong.
Cops aren't saints. As I said, there are good and bad, as in any line of work. What this ONE did was wrong, and a violation of a citizen's rights, because the cop was ignorant. Period. Not any other cop. Not his entire agency. HIM.
Whereas I see it as "open carry" that is just a little harder for a pickpocket or mugger to snatch. Sort of open with some (dis)assembly required; a layer of safety, no? In a busy city you might not want to be TOO open.
Anyhoo, if people can easily see it, how can they call it concealed?
An undercover agent with the Ohio Investigative Unit — the police agency that enforces the state’s alcohol, tobacco and food-stamp laws — saw the gun and quickly ordered him against his truck with his hands on his head.
I would sue this state. I would sue this man so hard that his descendants 100 years from now would STILL tell the story of how the family became permanently destitute.
There was an idiot Homicide detective who decided to play hero with me
while I was doing body work on my bosses Corvette. He pulled his
.45 and stuck it in my face after sneeking up behind me. I had no idea
this guy was a cop and I reacted by disarming him in an instant.
His supervisor was a good friend of mine, and he was desked until he received
training that they said would probably save his life. His career didn't go far.
“reasonable cause” should be “probable cause” PIMF
I agree with you. But I've seen examples of prosecutorial "interpretation" up close and personal. Some prosecutors are as low as some defense attorneys.
He is an undercover agent with the Ohio Investigative Unit this officer doesn't need to know any of the Federal Regs just the ones from the Ohio and its not like it's a trick question it's pretty straight forward .
“As a police officer, we also have the right to protect ourselves from the public.”
How is a man carrying openly, not hiding his weapon, any threat to you or anyone else?
You did everyone a public service.
“So basically you posted this to bash law enforcement officers. Golly you are cool.”
So now stating a FACT about the lack of knowledge of the law by police officers is “bashing?”
>I am less certain of the wisdom, if not legality, of a minor carrying a weapon under the same circumstances in which an adult can. A 14 year old walking around town with a rifle is a little scary. Maybe I am missing something. In the woods, hunting, yeah. On a subway, I might avoid the yout.<
Not me. I want to be standing right beside the young fella. If he makes the wrong move, I’ll either disarm or kill him before he can kill anyone else but if he’s got the proper safety attitude regarding firearms, I might just buy his next box of ammo.
“If you carry it in a see-through handbag or a clear plastic raincoat, is it concealed or open?”
IIRC in Washington state it’s if the weapong can be seen and/or quickly put to use. It’s been some years since I read about it though.
I am willing to bet that most LEO’s get more training in cultural sensitivity than they do on open carry laws.
I would probably carry the text of the law with me or paint the numbers on the side of the tractor for the Officer to look up in his handbook.
Consider the recent instances of motorists being TASERed during a routine traffic stop, SWAT teams kicking in the wrong door in the middle of the night, etc?
(Full disclosure here: I am a “Law & Order” type of guy, USMC veteran with a totally clean police record. However, someone comes kicking down my door in the middle of the night, shouting rapid-fire, unintelligible commands then I may just react before fully identifying the speaker.)
As to the subject of this post, if it is PERFECTLY LEGAL to openly carry a firearm, then why the “Up against the wall, redneck” treatment?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.