Posted on 01/31/2008 9:29:37 PM PST by Yosemitest
I agree. It is corrupt and liberal vs the corrupt, liberal, and mentally ill.
The “Talkies” know McCain would do more harm to conservatism than Hillary.
He hates conservatives and he feels much more at home with Teddy and Hillary. Heck, he was going to change partys...
He really already did...just has an R by his name.
The base is mad as hell....and they aren’t going to take it anymore.
A resounding NO to Juan~
I don’t blame Ann at all, I’m not voting if McCain wins, that’s a done deal.
OK. I'll buy. I'm delusional. I don't think that a McCain run by George Soros, Theresa Heinz, et. al. is any better than Hillary Clinton or Obama run by the same. With both Houses of Congress firmly belonging to the Democrats and Soros et.al., how would McCain be better than them? Tell me what he will do that they won't since they're all going to take their marching orders from the same crew.
I haven’t read through this Ann-Hillary stuff and don’t know if it is a joke — but whether it is or not — Ann Coulter IMO is unstable and extreme and given to radical thoughts and acts — “Ann Spears”. Reserve a bed at the home, please.
I couldn’t believe my eard. Is she just trying to stir us up?
Sorry, “ears” ... the sun is shining in my eyes.
Talkies are just afraid he will try to limited their enterprise and control of the political landscape. We need to let them know that we will back them if that ever comes up.
We will also have to keep McCain in line on Amnesty. It's all predictable.
All the above can be achieved but if you put sneaky tail Romney in office, how are you going to know what he is going to do?
This is an interesting psychological study. I think the stubborn, virulent opposition to supporting McCain in the general election (assuming he is the nominee) has more to do with cognitive dissonance than any actual patriotism or political calculation. It is very difficult for a person to be forced to change their minds about someone, or support a person they have so long outwardly abhored, especially when the abhorence was nurtured by their talk radio heroes. So, please, can we all agree that McCain is not the best nominee, but he is definitely better than Clinton, and a vote for McCain will not be seen as a showing of support, but rather as an anti-Hillary vote?
Its all about compromise, we are all gonna compromise ourselves into the Gulag...that maniacal laughing in the background in Soroass,Kennedy and McCain.
Romney did not grab guns as governor.
That’s it. I can’t stand her anymore. She’s even more shrill than shrillery. Just day-um.
So being a strict Constitutional contructionist violates Republican principles? That’s news to me. What are the traditional core principles of the Republican Party? I’ll give you a hint:
Small government... vs the FEDGOV monolith
Fedralism... vs Fascism
Constitutional Judiciary... vs social activist hacks
Responsible taxation... vs punative taxation
Fiscal restraint... vs pork barrel earmarks, entitlements and welfare
Fiscal integrity... vs bankrupting national debts, credit destroying trade imbalances, and a fiat monetary policy governed by Wall Street rather than governing Wall Street
Strong natioanal DEFENSE... vs the “PRE-EMPTIVE” OFFENSE of EMPIRE
Secure Borders... vs “Borders? What borders? I doan havta obey no stinkin’ borders!”
Foreign Policy founded upon STATESMANSHIP... vs hubris, duplicity and nation “building”
Promotion of Personal Responsibility, accountability and integrity... vs institutional nanny-state victumhood
Suuport of Traditionl Family... vs anything goes whatever PC
Defend Traditional American culture... vs Destroy culture in favor of balkenizing group politics
Have I missed anything?
Ron Paul suuports all these... the other three “GOP” clowns? Who knows what they actually believe in, since they change their views and votes with the season. They sure as hell are not Republicans in the traditional sense of the word. I will not cast my vote for any of them, no matter what they promise, because their word is not worth a damn. I prefer the man who is consistant over him who is tossed about on the waves.
“Yes, but the real issue isnt money, but the ambiguity that would be caused by a McCain Presidency, which would be uncomfortable for all of them. These shows thrive on things being clear-cut (i.e. anti-democratic president, anti-critics of Republican president), because their customers are passionate, true believers. A McCain presidency would mean they would have to either side with liberals against McCain, ignore McCain (how do you ignore a President?) or change their minds about them. None of these options are good for them.”
It couldn’t actullay be the fact that they’re conservatives could it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.