Posted on 01/16/2008 7:57:44 AM PST by shrinkermd
I don’t know what the ACLU is arguing, based on the first paragraph. I know what the AP says the ACLU is arguing, but since it doesn’t match the facts of the case, I’m not going to assume the AP managed to get this one right. It’s much more likely the ACLU is arguing that a sexual invitation has an expectation of privacy.. which is fine, as long as it also allows a fist as a valid, legal response.
Dealing with the ACLU is like going to a Minnesota airport bathroom.. you may be there for a reason, but it’s disgusting to know who might be standing next to you. Sen. Craig should refute every statement made in his ‘support’ by the ACLU. Then again, so should’ve Rush.
They just love adopting Republicans/conservatives and sending out ‘helpful’ press releases on their behalf.
Exactly...:-(
Actually...they are only saying that public sex in the Minneapolis airport...is ok. Thats all they’ve said so far. I was thinking...there ought to be a Minneapolis-sign...like two fingers on the nose...to let everyone know that you are urgently in need of a “Senator Craig”...and see what happens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.