Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shakesqueer
Campus Report ^ | January 9, 2008 | Bethany Stotts

Posted on 01/09/2008 10:56:17 AM PST by bs9021

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: bs9021
Photobucket
61 posted on 01/10/2008 10:43:19 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele
A push, a flush, and a refill: Professor Smith goes to the loo.

Or "The Lever and the Leavings: Indoor Plumbing and Ultimate Intimacy"

ROFL

62 posted on 01/10/2008 10:44:49 AM PST by MortMan (Have a pheasant plucking day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Is it possible that the plays were written largely during the reign of homophobic King Elizabeth I while the sonnets may have been authored during the reign of Queen James I who definitely had a thing for the handsome men about the court? W.S. did rely on royal patronage and wrote to please the court. Homo-erotic sonnets would definitely have pleased James I, but would NOT have pleased Elizabeth I at all.
63 posted on 01/10/2008 6:34:40 PM PST by seprgs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: seprgs

It is pssible, although I cannot profess to having any particular knowledge of the subject.


64 posted on 01/10/2008 6:58:03 PM PST by MortMan (Have a pheasant plucking day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: my_pointy_head_is_sharp
Is it possible that the sonnets weren’t even written by Shakespeare?

I'm not a literature expert but I have heard that questions like that can be resolved by computer analysis of comparative word frequencies. Probably someone would have noticed if the plays and sonnets had a different author.

65 posted on 01/10/2008 9:26:22 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bruinator
NOw that wasn’t nice. I am a Shakespear fan. My point is it has no affect on what effect the literature brings to individuals. At least it should not.

You're right. After I posted I realized that your comment could be taken a different way and my comment was mean. I agree that this type of historical footnote should have no influence on the appreciation of Shakespeare. Just re-reading the line "Shall I compare thee to a summer's day" one can see this man's genius and it doesn't really matter whom he was addressing.

On the other hand it should not be necessary to lie about the past and make it fit some ideal that does not accord with the known facts.

I don't even know that much about literature. I was a math major. But I knew I was right about this. Shakespeare lived so long ago that most of the facts of his life are a mystery. But his writing is there for all to see. One thing that is clear from this thread is that a lot of people who make dogmatic statements about Shakespeare's writing know even less about it than me.

66 posted on 01/10/2008 10:38:42 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The “College Profs” is a hoot. Thanks for posting the link.


67 posted on 04/05/2008 4:01:39 PM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson