Posted on 01/09/2008 8:54:49 AM PST by connell
They are under his name and above his signature. If he disagreed with their content he should have done something about it long ago.
It's as much his inaction as it is content. If you can't see that, then you are very shortsighted.
I have read that. What’s still missing is any explicit attempt over the years to counter the allegations made within the articles in question. On that he has remained silent.
You can try to cover up for his silence all you want. It doesn’t wash with me, or for that matter with many others.
Any documentation?
Some FReepers are missing the point about Paul by such a wide margin that I don't even know where to begin.
Relax people! He is NOT going to be POTUS obviously.
But he is doing something that will be much more valuable to keep (rather than "change") America from becoming a one world Gubmint sinkhole. He is introducing the young voters who have been indoctrinated in public schools and "collectivism" to the idea of limited government and freedom.
Don't hate the player, hate the game baby!
One of the oft repeated criticisms of Ron Paul's limit government positions is that he doesn't have specific, concrete plan all laid out to make it happen. Apparently just saying it's a good thing and we should work toward it is useless.
“Don’t hate the player, hate the game baby!”
Word up E-Dawg!
“One of the oft repeated criticisms of Ron Paul’s limit government positions is that he doesn’t have specific, concrete plan all laid out to make it happen.”
What kind of plan do you need?
Pack it in, turn out the lights. Sell the property.
Done deal.
Seems like it ought to be manageable enough, doesn't it?
“Seems like it ought to be manageable enough, doesn’t it?”
Yeah - people saying - “wheres the plan!” - what a lame excuse.
You don’t need a huge plan to shut it down.
Fire the uncivil servants. Sett the furniture. Sell the property. Case closed. Bye bye, Department of Education!
I did not see any complaint in the OP regarding Ron Paul's view on the Constitution...you're just utilizing a straw man argument, which shows your dishonesty. You are just providing further evidence that when it comes to Ron Paul supporters, integrity is not a prerequisite.
I love it when people call me dawg!
Perhspa if the Rockwellites had existed back then, they would have been 'converted' by events, like Lindbergh. But now, two generations after the fact, the Rockwellites are claiming that we shouldn't have gotten into WW II. Pay special attention to Ralph Raico's articles on the site.
I would like to see the statement where Rockwell states that we deserve to be conquered by any enemy.
How short are our memories! Right after 9/11 the perennially obscure Rockwellites popped into the mainstream news precisely because of this position. Harry Browne, who at one time was the Libertarian Party candidate, was almost run out of the country for saying this.
Evidence??? Cites??? Proof????
So it’s really Republican to want to incarcerate or kill someone who wants to use intoxicants that YOU disapprove of? Can you point out the specific part or parts of the Constitution which grant FedGov one whit of authority to do that?
Can you please tell me what “workable military deterrence” requires us having hundreds of thousands of troops stationed in over 120 different nations?
A simple plan of port calls by Naval and Marine forces would for any legitimate defense of our nation be sufficient to show the flag and have forces reasonably close to some place they MIGHT be needed. But having troops STATIONED in so many other SOVEREIGN nations is foolish at best. It’s like those kids who taunted the tiger at the SF zoo... Two seriously injured and one dead. Yes, the tiger is dead, and rightly so, but there was no need for the kids to taunt it.
Tell me, just exactly how would you react were the United States to have foreign troops, say from China or the Mid-East, STATIONED in this country? Might you not react as the tiger did? Yet this is how you want US to do other nations. WHY?
Where is there credible evidence that Soros has given one solitary cent to Ron Paul? I mean CREDIBLE evidence, not your unsupported assertions and accusations and suppositions...
Thank you. Good post.
This is how Ron Paul himself define neo-cons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.