Posted on 01/01/2008 5:32:21 PM PST by Norman Bates
Thanks! I’d have to say that’s one of my best posts in a long time! :-)
“There you go again. Keep pulling out your boogey man from your bag of campaign tricks. But before you do, take some time to answer this question: What makes you think that torture is effective? Please provide some data showing torture is effective.”
Honey, you’re the one that brought up “torture”.
I was talking about water-boarding.
“Border security, employer sanctions, self-deportation by attrition, and no amnesty would do it for me.”
I don’t see how anything else would work.
“John McCain strikes me as a sincere man.”
I can’t say that I agree.
Too many knifes in back.
I am so confident.
Water boarding is torture no matter what sort of denial you or Romney may wish to use.
Some people claim (falsely in my opinion) that both George W Bush and Dick Cheney are also draft dodgers. So far as I know neither of them broke any law to evade military service, and neither did Rudolph Giuliani. In my opinion, you are just engaging in name-calling.
“Furthermore your theory is predicated on the notion that waterboarding is the only way to gain intelligence - which is utterly absurd.”
Since I never said that, I can assume you simply erred rather than distorting what I said.
I’ve seen no reason to take “waterboarding” off the table.
“You’re making the argument Clinton made regarding his failure to serve.”
Clinton agreed to join the Arkansas ROTC in order to avoid the draft.
Clinton reneged on his agreement.
If this is the best you’ve got on Rudy, you need to hang it up for the night.
Nobody likes the idea of torture, but I agree with Mitt that we shouldn’t publicly discuss exactly what methods we might use and in what circumstances we might use them. Keep the evil ones guessing. And then there’s the old saying, “circumstances alter cases”. Suppose we captured a participant in a plot to blow up an American city with a nuclear weapon. Are you saying the President could retaliate and destroy a foreign city thereby killing millions of people, but in no circumstances might he order the rough interrogation of one such suspect? There seems to be a difficult moral dilemma here that defies an easy and pat answer.
Oh, and thank you for your service in the Navy.
**********
He lost not one, but two aircraft.
Was at the bottom of his class.
His family has a past regarding slavery (sure to thrill black voters when explioted by the racial arsonist clinton gang).
He married into a rich family like Kerry.
McCain hasn’t led anything that I know of.
Waterboarding has been compromised as an interrogation technique. There are other time tested means of interrogation that are effective.
“It seems even the opponents of Social Security reform know that McCain worked with President Bush. Now you know, too.”
Great, he appeared at a PR event.
WHAT-DID-MCCAIN-ACTUALLY-DO-AS-A-SENATOR(his actual job)TO-REFORM-SOCIAL-SECURITY?
(We know he has made time for McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, Gang of 14 etc.)
I appreciate your comments, but I must vehemently disagree with your characterization of torture as “rough interrogation methods.” I don’t think we weaken our national security by rejecting torture because I haven’t found credible evidence that torture is actually effective. The costs of using torture are too high while the benefits are too low.
You stated that McCain didn’t lift a finger to help the President. In fact, McCain went on the road to campaign with the President. You were wrong, admit your mistake and move on.
Romney talking down to John McCain on torture is the schoolchild backtalking the teacher. It’s laughable.
My point would be that we avoid ever getting to the ticking time bomb scenario, because if it ever gets that far and waterboarding is the only thing between us and a ticking mass casualty attack we’re already screwed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.