Ron Paul on War

Townhall.com ^ | December 19, 2007 | John Stossel

[Kaslin]

None, zero, zilch, 0

[rightwingintelligentsia]

Lol. He’s right, Montana could handle it.

It's probably literally true, but it's got to be the most ridiculous thing ever said by a Presidential candidate.

Now if Canada invaded New England, the liberals there would surrender in the first five minutes.

[flowerplough]

Ron Paul on War: “War is bad, mmm-kay? If you do war, your’re bad. Because war is bad. Mmm-kay?”

[CygnusXI]

“It is not Muslim fanaticism that is the culprit.”

All I need to know.

[wideawake]

If China were to do the same thing to us, and they had troops in our land, We would resent it. We'd probably do some shooting.

The US presence in Saudi Arabia was at the invitation of the Saudi government to protect the Saudi people from the Baathist invasion that had already claimed the neighboring country of Kuwait.

The only reason why Chinese troops would ever be stationed on US soil would be because China was invading us.

Ron Paul is clinically insane.

[rovenstinez]

Ron Paul makes a lot of sense! Sanity in a high office is an asset.

[jrooney]

"And if in most of Iraq, some religious fanatic comes to power and has money to buy nuclear weapons, we should just leave him alone?"

Talk to them and ask them pretty please not to set it off and kill our innocent civilians? The same guys that behead children and women? The same guys that slaughter anyone for power? Yeah that is going to work Paul. You are a dangerous stupid man and your supporters are no better.

[svcw]

Wiping tears from eyes. Boy, I needed a good laugh this AM.

[crz]

This Ass thinks he is a constitutionalist? This creep doesnt know squat about the US Constitution.
This guy’s a loser..and those who support him are losers also.

[wideawake]

Ron Paul makes a lot of sense!

Ron Paul is out of his mind.

He basically said in this interview that the US was an occupying power in Saudi Arabia during the First Gulf War.

That makes about as much sense as saying that US troops in England were an occupying force in the Second World War.

He is clearly delusional.

[demshateGod]

“Lol. He’s right, Montana could handle it.”

HaHa! Everything he said was stupid but this was very funny.

[mkjessup]

Ron Paul, the right man for the right time.

If the right time is 1901.

[wideawake]

Under the Constitution, we don't have the authority to just put troops in foreign countries willy-nilly when we're not at war.

Ron Paul, once again, drives my tagline home.

Under the actual Constitution of the United States, the Commander In Chief is entitled to deploy troops anywhere outside the United States he desires for any reason.

He has complete executive authority over US armed forces in both wartime and peacetime.

[sticker]

ru paul = ms garrison?

[Dead Corpse]

I don't think that's true. It is not Muslim fanaticism that is the culprit.

Ron, wake up and smell the jihad. You are completely, 100% wrong on this one.

[crz]

When I get into it with one of these “experts” who say we dont have the right to go to war in another country...all I do is ask them this-”Then we must have screwed up when we went to war with the Barbery (sic) pirates then?”

The only problem I have with this conflict is..It isnt a declared war. If we would have declared war a lot of these issues like the patriot act and the detaining of prisoners at gitmo would not have come up.

[dighton]

Musical Interlude

[bcsco]

Very few paulbots will defend him on this issue...

Oh, they have and they will. It may not be as vitriolic, but they'll defend him. It's in their water.

[wideawake]

Of course the Paulestinians will defend him on this.

The main reason why they support this treasonous faggot in the first place is because he is a shill for Islamic fascism.