Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Warning for Property Owners (Boulder, CO)
My Fox Colorado ^ | Novmeber 5, 2007 | TAMMY VIGIL

Posted on 11/12/2007 6:44:32 PM PST by beaversmom

Edited on 11/15/2007 7:42:04 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last
To: beaversmom

There are such laws in Texas too. Does this mean that illegal border crossers can claim your land for Mexico?


121 posted on 11/15/2007 7:50:20 PM PST by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Good point.


122 posted on 11/15/2007 8:06:51 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

bump


123 posted on 11/19/2007 6:25:41 AM PST by DvdMom (Impeach Nifong -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
It was up to the owners to keep the guy from using their property, which they did not do.

How can you prevent someone from using your property if you don't know they're using it, your other neighbors don't see them using it, and the land itself does not show use? That property was closely monitored, other neighbors testified that no one used the property on any open, continuous, exclusive, adverse or notorious basis.

Judge Klein ignored that testimony and ruled M/S had more "attachment" to the land than the people paying taxes and HOA fees on it. When the Kirlins tried to put up a fence to stop any claim of adverse possession, which was well within their rights to do so, an emergency restraining order signed by Judge Morris Sandstead at 5:20 p.m. on a Friday stopped them...after the court was closed.

There was a path that Edie Stevens testified was there the whole 18 years, but the satellite maps as recent as one year ago show there were no paths at all, anywhere.

A satellite picture is worth a thousand lies.

124 posted on 12/21/2007 10:59:13 PM PST by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty
"other neighbors testified that no one used the property on any open, continuous, exclusive, adverse or notorious basis."

We went over this and you're back at the beginning denying the facts of the case, which are that McLean's neighbors testified he used the land and some thought it was his. The Kirlins had no such witnesses.

"How can you prevent someone from using your property if you don't know they're using it"

the Kirlins testified they never checked. That testimony is noted in the court ruling.

"the land itself does not show use?"

BS.

"satellite maps as recent as one year ago show there were no paths at all, anywhere."

Pics that aren't posted don't exist. Besides that, Kirlin's images that are posted were taken to keep the evidence of use mostly out of the pics. Additionally the lawyer the Kirlin's reportedly paid $100K for sucked.

"an emergency restraining order signed by Judge Morris Sandstead at 5:20 p.m. on a Friday stopped them...after the court was closed."

Judges are always available to anyone for these sort of injunctions.

125 posted on 12/21/2007 11:16:03 PM PST by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I dont see what the problem is you dont really own land anyway. You lease it from the state.


126 posted on 12/21/2007 11:36:56 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Not so fast. You haven't read the latest news reports. McLean/Stevens are claiming now they never intended to take that land, they state Susie Kirlin is the one who is "confused" and that the Kirlins wanted $300,000 for it in mediation. All questionable statements. If they were so legally in the right, why are they saying these things now?

The Kirlins want the mediation records open to the public. McLean/Stevens don't. McLean/Stevens are allegedly seeking a "deal."

http://dailycamera.com/news/Ongoing-Coverage/adversepossession/

As for McLean/Steven's witnesses, they could have just lied through their teeth in Court. One of the witnesses was Tad Kline. Tad Kline works at KGNU, who interviewed McLean/Stevens and their unbelievable statements in an attempt to spin victimhood their way.

Consider the fact that the Kirlins filed for a building permit and got HOA approval which definitely shows, at least to the average person/juror, that they intended to protect their land and were prevented by court order to do so.

Maybe you can explain on what basis did Judge Morris Sandstead sign that emergency order on a Friday afternoon after the Court closed.

127 posted on 12/22/2007 4:35:39 PM PST by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Judges are always available to anyone for these sort of injunctions.

What are the chances that you and me go down to the Courthouse on a Friday afternoon at five minutes to five and get a restraining order on a neighbor, on the spot? I don't know about your State, but they're not that helpful in my State.

128 posted on 12/22/2007 4:40:00 PM PST by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon

As far as I know, building permits are NOT issued to people who don’t own the property they’re trying to build something on.


129 posted on 12/22/2007 4:43:32 PM PST by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
You might be interested in knowing:

Tad Kline is a former City Council member.
Tad Kline endorsed Clair Levy.
Clair Levy supports McLean and Stevens.

130 posted on 12/22/2007 4:53:08 PM PST by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Passing this along, too.

MORE CONNECTIONS TO KGNU AND MCLEAN/STEVENS:

One of the KGNU reporters, Tad Kline, testified on behalf of the M/S. If you google Tad Kline with KGNU, an article comes up about him interviewing Dick McLean in Feb '06 regarding RTD stuff. It obviously makes me question their objectivity with Dick/Edie and seems to explain why the Kirlins weren't invited on this morning (Dec. 17) for the KGNU show.

131 posted on 12/22/2007 4:56:00 PM PST by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty

Thanks for the update. I haven’t had to the time to follow this as of late.


132 posted on 12/22/2007 9:56:18 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Here's the latest: A Letter from McLean/Stevens

(Adobe Acrobat required to read.)

133 posted on 12/23/2007 5:15:30 PM PST by pray4liberty (Watch and pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson