Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High court to look at ban on handguns
McClatchy-Tribune ^ | Nov. 9, 2007, 12:18AM | MICHAEL DOYLE

Posted on 11/09/2007 3:17:09 AM PST by cbkaty

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,581-1,586 next last
To: Mojave

And maybe those penumbras and emanations are bullshit.


581 posted on 11/10/2007 10:32:37 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
And maybe those penumbras and emanations are bullshit.

Yep, that's the problem with your stance.

582 posted on 11/10/2007 10:47:29 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
Every year about 800 people die from accidental or undetermined gun deaths, the majority of these are adults or teenagers. Very few about 100 are are under the age of 15 . The rest of the gun deaths are murder, suicide, or death by cop.

So we are looking at banning a product which results in about 2-3 deaths per day out of 300 million that are pure accident. Ladders and stairs probably accout for as many accidental deaths as guns do.

583 posted on 11/10/2007 10:48:39 AM PST by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Starve.


584 posted on 11/10/2007 10:50:26 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I’m not saying I agree with the collectivist interpretation; I just wish that preamble was not there. It’s absence would solve a lot of problems.

Without the "militia" clause, Clinton's claim about the right to keep and bear arms for "hunting and sporting purposes" might have some plausibility.

585 posted on 11/10/2007 10:57:28 AM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Willful ignorance.


586 posted on 11/10/2007 11:29:15 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Third, the President didn't write the DC law -- Congress did.

Actually the DC council wrote it. That itself may be a Constitutional violation, since the Constitution states:

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;

However Congress gets a chance to review Acts of the Council before they become law..so maybe not.

587 posted on 11/10/2007 11:36:35 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

We’ve tried ignoring him.
Problem is, he posts that drivel practically every time any “what does the 2nd Amendment mean?” question comes up, starts an argument with the unaware, and presents a just-coherent-enough & just-impressive-enough premise that some people start to buy it.

It’s like leftists: much as we would like to ignore them in the hopes they’ll go away, they won’t go away, and without opposition will make society much worse.


588 posted on 11/10/2007 11:43:33 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Sometimes, people just need to be removed from a society.


589 posted on 11/10/2007 11:46:02 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Exactly. A primary reason I would argue with him was to hone my own arguments. I knew he would NEVER admit being wrong, but over time I got pretty good at nailing him down - at which point he would simply switch arguments or jump to another thread.


590 posted on 11/10/2007 11:49:07 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: Crim
The 2nd amendment affirms TWO rights...the rights of a “state”

Wrong. States have powers. States do not have rights. People have rights. The 2nd Amendment says nothing about "rights of a state"; it DOES say that states benefit from having a well-regulated militia, which is best and most easily achieved by protecting the rights of the people to keep and bear arms uninfringed.

The Constitution delegates to the states the power of appointing officers and conducting training & discipline; if the militia members (anyone able to fight) do not have weapons, that power is moot.

591 posted on 11/10/2007 11:53:11 AM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

We tried that. Doesn’t work. Ignoring some people doesn’t make them go away.


592 posted on 11/10/2007 12:00:32 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Some evidence is so obvious that it need not (or should not) be required by a court.


593 posted on 11/10/2007 12:02:41 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The Constitution delegates to the states the power of appointing officers and conducting training & discipline; if the militia members (anyone able to fight) do not have weapons, that power is moot.

I'm not sure the Constitution can delegate anything to the States. The Constitution is a grant of a set of enumerated powers to the national government, by the States. They didn't need to delegate to themselves what was theirs to start with.

594 posted on 11/10/2007 12:05:27 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: Jim Verdolini

Ergo, don’t nominate Rudy.


595 posted on 11/10/2007 12:06:37 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
The US Constitution states
The Congress shall have Power ... To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Make of that what you will.
596 posted on 11/10/2007 12:10:59 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Maybe just a matter of semantics, but it comes down the difference between “reserved” and “delegated”. “Reserved” means that the States retained this power for themselves, and exercise it on thier own behalf. “Delegated” means that the power rightly belongs to someone else, and the States are merely allowed to exercise it on someone else’s behalf.


597 posted on 11/10/2007 12:16:13 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: Jim Verdolini

You wrote: If there is a third party condidate there will be a democrat in the White House.

Yes. Probably for four years. Much better than a RINO.

The worst vote I ever cast was for George lyin’ Ryan the Rino Gov. from Illinois. He destroyed the republican party and is now in jail.

As much as I dislike Hillary, I will not vote for Mitt, Rudy or McCain.


598 posted on 11/10/2007 12:24:08 PM PST by proudpapa (Thompson and/or Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Ditto Pataki in NY. Having the automatic support of most Republicans, this RINO managed to pass the most oppressive gun laws since the Sullivan Act (registering handguns) - something that hardcore leftist Cuomo couldn’t do despite 12 years as governor.

Observe too that faced with a Republican-controlled Congress, Bill Clinton didn’t get much done at all.


599 posted on 11/10/2007 12:32:42 PM PST by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Thus, the issue will become whether the states can regulate gun ownership...

If the states can regulate gun ownership, it only follows that they can regulate "free expression."

You can't have it both ways.
600 posted on 11/10/2007 12:42:13 PM PST by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have .chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 1,581-1,586 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson