Skip to comments.
High court to look at ban on handguns
McClatchy-Tribune ^
| Nov. 9, 2007, 12:18AM
| MICHAEL DOYLE
Posted on 11/09/2007 3:17:09 AM PST by cbkaty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,420, 1,421-1,440, 1,441-1,460 ... 1,581-1,586 next last
To: publiusF27
So you’ve returned to your Crips and Bloods are militia nonsense. Scalia would be amused.
To: Mojave
Why don't you show me the exemption?
BTW, the federal hegemony you feared so much has arrived in Chicago.
Chicago Gun Case
Chicago probably has some Crips and Bloods, maybe even some with no felony convictions, so leaving aside your silly question of whether § 311 applies to them, let's get to the core question, and the only relevant one in a gun thread:
Does the 2nd amendment apply to them?
To: publiusF27
Scalia just finished showing that the right to keep and bear arms had nothing to do with such crackpot theories.
Extreme short term memory loss?
To: Mojave
Scalia just finished showing that the right to keep and bear arms had nothing to do with such crackpot theories.
Yes, and it does lead one to wonder why you were so obsessed with the question of whether Crips and Bloods are in the militia, and why you said twice that the answer to that question had some relevance to gun rights, but that's no reason to hide this exemption to § 311 you claim exists. Or, if you want to stay on the topic of gun rights, answer the question of whether the 2nd amendment applies to Crips and Bloods in Chicago?
To: publiusF27
I think Roscoe’s just PO’d about the ruling and want’s to make it go back to arguing like it never happened.
1,425
posted on
06/29/2008 7:53:13 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: publiusF27
do you see any exemption in TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 311 for Crips and Bloods? Unconvicted Crips and Bloods have 2nd Amendment rights, just like the rest of us who have not been convicted of any crime
One underlying point about "unconvicted Crips" is the presumption that they are criminals who just have not yet been convicted of any of the crimes they have surely performed, particularly since it seems that committing a crime is part of the gang initiation process
The solution is to catch, convict, and incarcerate or execute them. The bottom line is that anybody who is too dangerous to be allowed to own a gun, is too dangerous to be loose on the street
1,426
posted on
06/29/2008 8:06:01 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
To: publiusF27
Chicago probably has some Crips and Bloods, maybe even some with no felony convictions, How does one definitively prove that a particular black male is or is not a member of a gang?
Or should 2nd Amendment rights be withdrawn from all inner-city black males, based on their race and residence?
1,427
posted on
06/29/2008 8:11:06 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
To: tacticalogic
There are different versions of the five stages of grief, but in all of them the first one is denial. ;)
To: PapaBear3625
Easy with the FRiendly fire, PB. I was turning Roscoe’s silly and irrelevant militia question into one with relevance on a firearms thread. I agree with you on the answer to the question.
To: publiusF27
why you were so obsessed with the question of whether Crips and Bloods are in the militiaYou called me to the thread.
To: publiusF27
silly and irrelevant militia question into one with relevance on a firearms threadBy quoting Scalia denying such relevance.
Shoot that foot!
To: Mojave
Because someone with a foot fetish who thinks black is white is endlessly amusing to me. ;)
OK, so I just wanted to let you know that your favorite question was finally rendered moot.
To: Mojave
You know.... Scalia et al pretty much affirmed every argument I've ever used on one of these threads with you.
Poor you...
Give up your hate of the Constitution. Come on... we'll forgive you.
1,433
posted on
06/29/2008 8:57:18 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: publiusF27
You think black is white? That would explain a lot.
To: Dead Corpse
Scalia et al pretty much affirmed every argument I've ever usedNo examples, naturally.
Dream on, Walter Mitty.
To: Mojave
Your favorite question is now moot, and your denial makes it that much funnier. ;-)
To: publiusF27
Your favorite question is now moot Backwards. Your favorite false assertion is now moot. And still absurd.
To: Mojave
Forwards. And still no cites, no answers, natch.
To: publiusF27
Extreme short term memory loss. Scalia spanked you.
To: Mojave
That it's an individual Right unconnected to service in an active duty militia. That is protects "arms" in general, not just a specific type of "arm".
Poor Roscoe... still trying to spin even though the wheels have come off his little apple cart...
Give it up. Come back to reality. We won't hold it against you. Seriously...
1,440
posted on
06/29/2008 12:32:04 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,420, 1,421-1,440, 1,441-1,460 ... 1,581-1,586 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson