Posted on 10/18/2007 6:07:42 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
China manipulates their currency, so it doesn’t increase in value. THe South American countries did the same, to guard against the opposite, a falling value. For latin america it was an incredible success, until it got out of hand, and exploited by the likes of Soros and similar. Mexico got hammered in that, and they had to devalue their currency significantly. At least in Latin America, the loans yes, were paid back with much cheaper money. In china, they will have to pay back loans that explode to the upside in price, as soon as this scheme fails. The repurcussions from this will be talked about for a very, long, time...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRzr1QU6K1o
Above is video of Richard Nixon when he slammed shut the gold window. Listen to the weasel words
Please note I’m not a Nixon hater
Yeah old man Bush and Mulroney (former Canada PM) made big money with Barrick. My guess is they still own Barrick
The whole point being that “free traitors” advocate trade policies that leave us with outlandish trade deficits that bring the inevitable dollar crashes. But same “free traitors” hedge themselves against dollar crashes with gold. That primitive barbaric relic
George Bush (#41) understands the visceral attraction of gold unlike say, uh, “professional”
John Maynard Keynes denounced gold as a “barbaric relic”
'Ain't it great?
It's good for everyone.............except America..........
Yup, Gold Fever...
I’ve admitted that gold has merit, the ultimate way to protect your money. But it doesn’t grow.
You could also say that you are protecting your money when you buy a stock. You give money, buy stock, the stock might be valued in dollars, but the stock is based in value by the profit it makes. And usually, if the currency is lower, they make more money, making the stock......go up.
So, both protect from a declining currency, but with the stock you also have the byproduct, of profit. Or at least the potential for it.
Get a 10 year chart and you’ll find gold has been “growing” ever since 9 11 2001
Sure, I’d love to go back in time buying it, and throw in some oil stocks too, but that isn’t how it works. Both oil and gold have history of making very big moves, but then can do absolutely nothing for a long time too. If you rode the big move, good for you, nice call. Price appreciation though, not exactly growth, because it didn’t make anything, there is nothing being spun off from the big vault of gold someone owns. If you owned a stock, you’d get dividends, cd you’d get interest, real estate you’d get rent, etc.. Gold, like other physical items simply increases from the inflation or currecny adjustment. Ok, I’ll admit that an increase in say commercial need can add to that? Again, good call, nice to make money, don’t want to make you or anyone else here all mad and threaten to contact the “cops” on me, like the golf cheater said he’d do...
I’m not great with HTML. Care to put a chart up?
Point being gold is up since 9 11 2001
Same for oil
If you can, show a chart of the Nasdaq from Jan 1999 to Jan 2001. The upchart here, looks virtually identical.
I pulled it up, but could not find a way to cut and paste it.
I’m not a chartist, but do follow it a wee bit. Comparing the two, you see the same volatility, then the major upspike, a correction that rallies harder....
Again, not to argue or make anyone mad, just find it interesting. I certainly don’t need any FR Gestapo agents to call my employer or anything...
Again, not to argue or make anyone mad, just find it interesting. I certainly dont need any FR Gestapo agents to call my employer or anything...
_____
Hahha
You’re OK
Just naive about gold but so what
I'll grant that you are (by your own account) a Financial Super Genius. That you have an extreme knack over the past decade or two of putting more and more digits into the electronic ledgers.
I would only humbly suggest that you study history a bit more broadly than the past decade or two, and gold's lasting value as a store of wealth may be revealed to you.
Say, 6,000 unbroken years of human history, as opposed to a couple of decades.
(Hint: There is a reason why Germany doesn't use the Weimar D-mark any more.)
Need more? How about former Fed chairman Paul Volcker? About two years abo he said that there is a 75 percent chance of a dollar crash within the next five years. (Three years to go by my crude math.)
Now, I realize that you are a lot smarter than Paul Volcker, but maybe he's not a complete moron like the rest of us non-Financial Super Geniuses here.
During steady economic times, yes. During crisis times, no. Many folks over the age of 75 have folders full of stock certs that are worth exactly the paper they are printed on, plus the ink. Their paper assets went to zero.
You may believe (based on your life experience) that stocks are literally better than gold, but don't bet on them holding their value (much less increasing) across a period of economic turmoil and dislocation. You may wind up with a stack of "Confederate War Bonds," as has happened time and again over history. (Or in the modern era, a series of zeros on your computer.)
Now, that might be beyond your experience horizon I'll grant you. You do need to read history to discover this.
Are we entering such a time? Paul Volcker is one of those you may have heard of who says yes.
Of course, you are free to just laugh it up. That is your right.
PM from Professional to Travis, yesterday.
Re: Dollar dives as US slump spreads
From Professional | 10/19/2007 8:47:34 PM PDT read
Financial genius? Wouldnt that be you, mr. thousand dollar gold next year prognosticator? Youre just mad, cuz youre a gold bug, and think that this object is your savior. You know, thousands of years ago people knelt for gold. Know where it got them? Let me guess, at one time, you were in the financial biz, couldnt hack it, got fired, been pissy ever since? Go back to your bomb shelter, get your Ron Paul poster, and go to bed with it you crazy gold bug. He he he, loser.
Great question! According to Professional, gold has no more inherent value than gravel, other than being more compact.
You truly believe that gold is in the position that the nas was before it’s recent dumper? LOL, you are a riot.
incorrect. inflation in the States as selectively reported by the economic overlords who use the figures to keep wages low is negligible.
there is a *HUGE* disconnect between what the real inflation rate is and what is reported -- I've seen some estimates that the real rate of inflation is more like two or three times the reported CPI of 2.8%
actually, it *did* turn out "very well" for some of the Japanese after the late 80's - the economic overlords in Japan were able to create a form of economic/consumer slavery which has keep wages there completely stable - the apparent continuous recession they have been in since the 1980's is just the way the Japanese financial/industrial masters want it - Japanese companies are *very* profitable. while there is a nearly 0% interest rate in Japan (!) just try to get a loan in Japan if you are a regular Japanese consumer/citizen... its very difficult.
Japan has morphed into a modern consumer slave state, and the US is headed in that direction and already has picked up some of the same characteristics - check US wage growth over the last 20 years for example...
Ok Travis, think you can ease up a bit fella.
From looking at your posts, thinking it over, I certainly see where you guys are coming for. If you know want to beat me bloody into submission, then I’m going to have to get a helmet.
Obviously, the price of gold over the last couple years cannot just be argued away for the sake of the USD. Someone else is buying it, and I’d guess that they have a number of reasons. Many emerging nations are running huge surplusses, wonder if that has anything to do with it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.