Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are You Ready For WWIV? Author Says Fight Is Now
TheBulletin ^ | October 11, 2007 | By: Herb Denenberg, The Bulletin

Posted on 10/14/2007 9:12:34 PM PDT by PRePublic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: ClearBlueSky
If it comes to more violent means to protect our civilization, on a personal level I am ready for that too.

The Marines are always looking for a few good men.

41 posted on 10/15/2007 4:47:01 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eyes Unclouded
What about 1993? I guess Pearl harbor wouldn’t have counted if Japan didn’t sink any ships?

1993 is disregarded because the leadership in this country, at the time, was too corrupt and inept to fight.

42 posted on 10/15/2007 5:02:40 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PRePublic

Our republic is hopelessly saturated with the poison of liberalism and political correctness. The poison is in the universities, the grade schools, the media, the entertainment industry, the churches and synagogues, the courts, the Congress, and the White House.

Americans who recognize the threat from Islam as such, and are willing to fight against it, are in a miniscule minority. Openly saying so will soon be a hate crime for which you must forfeit your guns.

One day the Muslim world will openly and collectively acknowledge that it IS Islam as such, which is attacking the West. Most likely it won’t happen until at least one American city is destroyed by a nuclear weapon, and our leaders unanimously decide there is nowhere on earth we can deliver appropriate retaliation.

Despair, yes. That’s how I see it. If Flight 93 was heading for the Capitol, they were wasting their time going after a congress of dhimmis.


43 posted on 10/15/2007 5:05:50 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (You can endorse the murder of 50 million unborn babies; but don't say "macaca.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

It began when Sirhan Sirhan assasinated a US Senator in 1968. Then the airline hijackings began..


44 posted on 10/15/2007 6:47:17 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky
With all due respects, this sounds very similar to those Americans who demanded that ALL Japanese-Americans in the early WWII days should be all rounded up and thrown into a camp, just because they were of Japanese descent.

Let's treat each individual-Muslim, Catholic, atheist, Baptist on their own merits or shortcomings, not as a group, OK? Just my opinion....

45 posted on 10/15/2007 7:34:46 AM PDT by China Clipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
It began when Sirhan Sirhan assasinated a US Senator in 1968. Then the airline hijackings began..

OK, I'm seeing a trend backwards in time here. If you take the long view, it began the day that mohamed first p!ssed on territory taken at the edge of a sword. This the 1,400 year war. (Or thereabouts)

46 posted on 10/15/2007 8:07:31 AM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Man, that's stupid...even by congressional standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: China Clipper

You know what? Putting yourself in the mindset of 1942-not 2007- Japanese internment made sense .It was a protective measure. Rights were TEMPORARILY abridged for the good of the nation. They didn’t know who could be trusted among the Japanese here, and we had been ATTACKED by Japan.
Bottom line- there were no Japanese ‘terrorist’ attacks on American soil during WW2. And don’t believe for a minute that there weren’t any Japanese here who would have acted against the US.
The internment worked, it protected us from internal attack. When Japan was defeated, those internment camps closed.

When the enemy is among you, and you can’t tell friend from foe, it is suicidal to trust blindly rather than ‘offend’.Would you rather offend several million Muslims in this country, or prevent more 9-11’s?
I will treat every Muslim according to their beliefs. And they- by identifying themselves as Muslim- tell me that they believe every word in the Koran INCLUDING THE WORDS THAT THREATEN MY LIFE AND MY CULTURE.
Theirs is an ENEMY IDEAOLGY. Identify with it and you are my enemy.
I believe a Marine walking down the street believes in the Marine Corp creed. I believe that a member of NAMBLA believes in sex with boys. I believe people who call themselves Klansmen hate blacks and Jews.I believe that every human can expect to be judged by the organizations and groups to which they belong. Why belong to them otherwise?
Islam is a world thug-gang that is earning it’s bloody reputation every day. I would no more consider treating a Muslim as a kindly individual than I would a member of the Bloods or the Crips.
To call oneself a Muslim is to say they believe in the Koran.
The Koran is the evil handbook of an evil belief system. You cannot believe in evil, hold it holy and defend it, and claim any sort of goodness.
Angels do not dance with Satan.


47 posted on 10/15/2007 9:48:13 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I am female, and past the age where the Marines would accept me. But thanks for the compliment!
This soldiers daughter would give our military free-reign in war. One directive only. Defeat the enemy, utterly and finally. No rules, no questions asked, and no apologies.


48 posted on 10/15/2007 9:53:02 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky
We need to eliminate the enemies at home first. If we don’t, our forces will be undercut at every turn. Step one is defining the line between “free speech” and treason. Step two is rigorously enforcing it.
49 posted on 10/15/2007 9:56:08 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

There you go! Plain common sense!
You don’t spend a fortune, and years, eliminating rat-holes miles from your house, while ignoring the ones crawling under your bed.
There can be no internal terrorist attacks in this country if there are no terrorists here. The source of terrorism now is a rats nest called Islam. It IS PRODUCING the terror.
The source must be destroyed. First where we live, then on the planet.
Don’t trust what comes out of the hole.
Fire burns. Rain is wet. Islam kills.


50 posted on 10/15/2007 10:03:30 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky
Actually, I was thinking of starting with Nancy Pelosi, Turban Durbin, Dingy Harry, Fat Jack Murtha, Teddy the Swimmer,and the rest. IMHO, they long ago crossed the border from representing their constituencies into treason. When their pronouncements show up in Al Qaeda documents, as reasons for the terrorists to continue fighting, there can really be no doubt...
The lawyers of the ACLU (and a bunch from the Pentagon, too) can join them at Ft. Leavenworth, too.
51 posted on 10/15/2007 10:13:17 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky
Actually, I was thinking of starting with Nancy Pelosi, Turban Durbin, Dingy Harry, Fat Jack Murtha, Teddy the Swimmer,and the rest. IMHO, they long ago crossed the border from representing their constituencies into treason. When their pronouncements show up in Al Qaeda documents, as reasons for the terrorists to continue fighting, there can really be no doubt...
The lawyers of the ACLU (and a bunch from the Pentagon, too) can join them at Ft. Leavenworth, too.
52 posted on 10/15/2007 10:13:19 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: China Clipper

With all due respect- I am really trying to understand something here.
WHY the insistence that individual Muslims be separated from their ideology? Its pretty plain that Islam is anti every other religion. Why may we not assume that individual Muslims believe what their religion says?
We don’t challenge/disbelieve that an atheist does not believe in a deity. We don’t try to convince ourselves that Baptists, Catholics, Jews, etc do not believe what their religion preaches.
Why are Muslims exempt from being judged by what they believe, and what their religion admits to?
Is it the numbers? Is it that it is easier to imagine millions don’t believe the basic directives of Islam than it is to face it? Because facing it would mean we have millions of mortal enemies- and then the only decision left is what to do, fight or surrender?
Honestly- anyone- I am really trying to understand the reasoning that goes into the almost desperate insistence that we NOT judge Muslims according to Islam, when we judge every other being on the planet according to the belief system and groups to which they belong.


53 posted on 10/15/2007 10:20:27 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PRePublic
Podhoretz original column appearing in Commentary Magazine.
54 posted on 10/15/2007 10:22:28 AM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

55 posted on 10/15/2007 10:26:04 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Nazism was a ‘religion’, for all intents and purposes.A cult of hate, death and domination- as is Islam.
Bullets did pretty good against Nazism.
It was resolve and GUTS and the determination that the Nazi ideolgy would NOT dominate the world that made the difference.
That’s what’s missing now.
We have more bullets, more weapons, and the ability to eradicate the new Nazism.
It’s the inability to face the us-vs-them scenario, and a lack of national guts that is the problem.


56 posted on 10/15/2007 10:32:17 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

There is an analogy, but the islams think they have a religion and not only that but the only religion. Fascism was defeated, but guess what? it hasn’t gone away.


57 posted on 10/15/2007 10:37:18 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

I’m not for financing internment camps to feed that bunch! Especially not the Swimmer- who could afford it?
Actually- since there is NO doubt as to their alliegances
(unlike the Japanese during WW2) I’d prefer a couple of C-130’s be used. Load’em up, and drop said individuals out over the ‘paradise’ that is the middle-east. A particularly nasty spot. Parachutes optional.


58 posted on 10/15/2007 10:37:49 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

No- it has not. There are neo-Nazis everywhere, BUT, are the numbers there? And who among us is insisting that there are ‘good’ neo-Nazis and facists?
Who is doing mental contortions to fantasize that there are facists who don’t believe in facism? Can any sane being say the words ‘good’ and ‘Nazi’ in the same sentence? Would society allow such an assumption?

And you know as well as I that religions can be wiped out. How many ancient religions no longer exist? Seen any Mayans tossing human sacrifices down pyramids lately? How about old Ra? He was big at one time!
History is full of religions that do not exist now. Islam belongs with them.


59 posted on 10/15/2007 10:47:56 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

60 posted on 10/15/2007 10:52:45 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 years later we're still sitting on the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson