Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Debt Collection Fraud? ANFI Collections
9/27/07 | me

Posted on 09/27/2007 1:17:56 PM PDT by AFreeBird

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: BearCub

That’s not what I was thinking about, maybe I meant Cease and Desist Letter.


41 posted on 09/27/2007 2:47:31 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: diotima

I operate a collection agency. It sounds like the poster is getting hit by Zombie agencies that buy up old paper for like .02/$1.00 then mass-mail everyone on the list. Some pay because they’ve never been dunned before and don’t know their rights/obligations under the Fair Debt Collections Act.

1. Every notice must contain the name of the Agency, a toll-free number and the statement basically that if you disagree, send them a letter telling them why, ask for the original creditor and other information.

2. Do everything in writing. These zombies will threaten you with your credit report but tell them to comply with the FDCPA or go to hell.

3. Call them. Ask for a supervisor. Ask that the file be noted as disputed and tell them the dispute document is in the mail and you expect a prompt response.

4. If you have no written response within the designated period, send a copy again, together with a cover cc’ing the consumer protection agency in your state.

5. If an entry is made to your credit report, contact the bureau, explain the situation, ask for it to be coded a dispute and then call the consumer protection agency.

If the debt is more than 7 years old, or if they’re fishing in the wrong pond, you could make some serious change here.

Also, the company that sold the debt does not lack responsibility for actions of it’s agent. Sprint is one of the foremost sellers of debt in the industry, although they usually unload it promptly. It’s when the agency that bought the debt for $.30/$1.00 sells it to another agency and they sell it to another that the problems begin.

Everything in writing. Do not accept assurance by phone that it is taken care of. Demand written responses. Know your rights but keep up with your obligations insofar as perfecting your dispute under law.

Good luck. A quick reference on statutory debt limits can be found at www.lawdog.com BUT it’s not always current and may even be misleading. Check your local state’s consumer protection agency for spefics.


42 posted on 09/27/2007 2:50:59 PM PDT by Smoke6 (And a man said to the Universe, Sir I exist! To which the Universe replied "So what.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: diotima
The people there know what they are talking about.

Maybe it's changed but a couple of years ago they were useless. Art of Credit was a good board but appears to be gone.

The problem with creditboards is they get people sending stupid "validation" letters filled with pseudo-legalese that is meaningless & is a clear tip-off to the creditor that you're using those boards. The collectors read the boards too.

The best approach is a folksy, home-spun sounding letter that accomplishes your task without making you sound sophisticated. So instead of quoting the FCRA and FDCPA, you send a letter that says:

I received your letter regarding this debt and I don't think it belongs to me. Please send me more information so I can determine whether this debt is mine.

That does two things from a legal standpoint: You (a) have disputed the debt, and (b) have requested that they validate it. You did both without sounding like you knew what you were doing. They will be far less careful with you under those circumstances.

So then later they report the item to the credit reporting agency without also reporting that it is disputed. Bam. That's your first FDCPA violation and is enough to sue over. You sue in your local JP or small claims court. If you owe them less than $1000 or so, they won't fight you and will likely write you a check, absolve you of the debt and remove the item from your credit report. I know this is true because, to quote Ron White, "I've seen me do it".

43 posted on 09/27/2007 2:51:42 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BearCub

Only $500? Maybe it’s a state-by-state thing, but we can sue for $1000 in Missouri. Per violation of the FDCPA. I know one guy that collected 5 grand from one company.


44 posted on 09/27/2007 2:53:14 PM PDT by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant Distraction on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Experiment 6-2-6
I didn't promise to pay, I did ask, because the agent said because of the circumstances he could see what his supervisor could do; what the supervisor would do. The response was 50%. That made me ask what the "original bill was". He didn't know, didn't have the records. I said I'd have to see original copies of "GTE" bills. He said I'd have to request that in writing.

After reading through some things here, I'm not going to request anything except for them to cease and desist. And with the warning that any reports of a 15yo debt, obtained from other agencies, to the credit bureau's would probably (since it would be reasonable to assume it's already been reported there 15yo) violate the Fair Debt Collections Act, and if that occurred, all sorts of agencies would be called into play: FTC, State AG, Lawyers, etc.

45 posted on 09/27/2007 2:53:29 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
That’s not what I was thinking about, maybe I meant Cease and Desist Letter.

Ah. Cease and Desist works very well for debts that are out of statute. You end up living with a ding on your report, but its impact fades with time.

The very super-duper bestest way I've found to deal with small items is by writing them a check for the entire amount of the debt plus $1 in return for complete removal of the offending item. I laser-printed the agreement on the back of the check with a conspicuous note on the front referring them to the back. This is a twist on an Accord & Satisfaction but made safer by including the extra dollar. In a normal A&S the dispute provides the consideration for the agreement and isn't valid in all states. In this case the extra dollar does and is close to bulletproof, at least in my experience.

46 posted on 09/27/2007 2:57:42 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

bump for later


47 posted on 09/27/2007 2:58:18 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head
Only $500? Maybe it’s a state-by-state thing, but we can sue for $1000 in Missouri. Per violation of the FDCPA. I know one guy that collected 5 grand from one company.

The FDCPA only allows for $1000 total (in one suit). States that have their own laws may have additional per-violation penalties but the FDCPA doesn't.

That said, you always sue for $1000 per violation because it looks scary and they're too dumb to know better. Make sure it doesn't go beyond the limits of the court you're suing in. Here it's $5k in a Justice Court.

If only the FDCPA applies, no lawyer of theirs is going to let them get taken for $1k per violation. The $500 is a fair compromise between nothing (if I lose) and the maximum I can be awarded.

48 posted on 09/27/2007 3:02:03 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
I'm not going to request anything except for them to cease and desist

I concur - that's the best course of action for you.

49 posted on 09/27/2007 3:03:53 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
All the good answers you see here I got from that search. My best help came from Tom Martino (www.troubleshooter.com) and Clark Howard (www.clarkhoward.com). They tried this om my wife and mother about six months ago. I got smart real quick and used several of these suggestions in this thread against them. You have to be aggressive.

What happened to you was a collection firm trying to collect on a Zombie debt. Whether its legit or not is hard to tell. You may have of never owed them that $100 in the first place.


50 posted on 09/27/2007 3:13:25 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BearCub
... So then later they report the item to the credit reporting agency without also reporting that it is disputed. Bam. That's your first FDCPA violation and is enough to sue over. You sue in your local JP or small claims court. If you owe them less than $1000 or so, they won't fight you and will likely write you a check, absolve you of the debt and remove the item from your credit report. I know this is true because, to quote Ron White, "I've seen me do it".

Bite the scammers. I like it, and if I didn't have enough personal grief to deal with right now, I might consider it. As it stands though, I think cease and desist is all I care to do. Although I will be checking my credit reports. If I see it on there, I will bite them back.

Thanks!

51 posted on 09/27/2007 3:18:20 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Whether its legit or not is hard to tell. You may have of never owed them that $100 in the first place.

I think it's VERY suspicious that my coworker got the same letter, same alleged creditor and same alleged amount.

52 posted on 09/27/2007 3:19:05 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BearCub
Damn, that is the best advice yet. Personal experience?


53 posted on 09/27/2007 3:24:23 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BearCub

re: FDCPA/FCRA

What I cited might not be true as you see it, but that was exactly what a federal judge overseeing a bankruptcy case involving my cousin ruled when creditors going back 10 years sought to be included on the list of those parties my cousin owed money to. I quoted the judge verbatim.

That was 1999.


54 posted on 09/27/2007 3:32:47 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Damn, that is the best advice yet. Personal experience?

Yes. I've sued four collection agencies and got settlement checks from three. The last one I just kind of let go and the court dismissed it (without prejudice). In the three cases, the settlement also required that they completely remove the account from my credit reports.

So yeah, it works great. Nobody can argue with the math. They are going to pay their attorney $200 per hour to deal with it. So if you figure answering the original petition and maybe one set of interrogatories, they're out $600 and we've only gotten started. Then they have the downside of acutally losing - that's potentially another $1000 and who knows what in attorney's fees.

My downside? Nothing. Nada. If I lose I don't have to pay their attorney's fees. I don't have any of my own because I do it myself. What if they countersue? Generally they can't. They don't have standing to countersue - I don't owe them the money, I (allegedly) owe their client the money.

Bait, document, bait, document, sue and settle. Not one got anywhere close to seeing the inside of the courtroom.

55 posted on 09/27/2007 3:37:55 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
What I cited might not be true as you see it, but that was exactly what a federal judge overseeing a bankruptcy case involving my cousin ruled when creditors going back 10 years sought to be included on the list of those parties my cousin owed money to. I quoted the judge verbatim.

Well the judge had it wrong, which is no surprise because unless you immerse yourself in this stuff it's hard to understand. Likewise, a bankruptcy court judge probably isn't really up to speed on maritime law.

56 posted on 09/27/2007 3:41:10 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Nomorjer Kinov

I heard that too, but apparently if you make a new payment, the clock is started all over again and your credit can suffer.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There are a lot of tricks that the scam artists know. I once had to file in small claims court in North Carolina to collect a $500. bad check. The clown who wrote the check saw me on the way to the court house and tried to give me a partial payment of $10.00. I had been warned about this tactic so I refused anything less than full payment. If you accept any partial payment then it changes from a bad check charge to a loan which is impossible to ever collect. He waited until the court day and went in and paid the thing in full to the court rather than pay me. I got my money but it cost me a whole day and a hundred mile drive to get it.


57 posted on 09/27/2007 3:51:59 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anybody still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Faith65

bookmark


58 posted on 09/27/2007 4:30:02 PM PDT by Faith65 (Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BearCub
Nope. There is no resetting the clock. The 7-1/2 years is from the date the account first went delinquent. A subsequent payment doesn't reset the clock. That said, you could make a payment that brings the account completely current. Then a few months later you go delinquent again. That new delinquency will have its own 7-1/2 year reporting period. But partial payments that don't pay off the entire past-due amount have no effect on the reporting period.

Paying an out of date bill does indeed reset the statute of limitations in many states and does allow it to update your credit report with more lates up to the current payment.

59 posted on 09/27/2007 7:14:08 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: scan59

Ping to self. Someone I know needs this information.


60 posted on 09/27/2007 7:46:50 PM PDT by babyfreep (Duncan Hunter Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson