Posted on 09/19/2007 7:14:10 PM PDT by pissant
Back it up pissant!
BREEEEEP! Wrong answer. Please try again...
////////////
So you’re bird. Great.
Now you are lying through your teeth again. I said Fred WAS pro-choice. He NOW claims to be pro-life.
I already backed it up. You just ignored it, sally.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1899326/posts?page=583#583
Yes, I remember the magazine but I never read it. Several of my friends subscribed to the magazine, I think.
I'd like to give two examples of how the best of Christians can err politically on the side of "loving" their fellow man and "judging not."
First on many people's minds is Dubya's puzzling enablement of illegal immigration. I think his heart is overruling his head in this issue — he wants to do the good and loving thing for distressed people, but shortcutting the rule of law is a disaster.
Second, the late, beloved Pope John Paul II, having as a youth in Poland witnessed the Nazi persecution of homosexuals or the use of homosexual accusations to silence people, suppressed and turned away the question of homosexuality in evaluating church personnel, which enabled a destructive subculture to thrive unchecked. His intentions were noble, but the results were a disaster.
No man has ever been perfect but Jesus Christ. And we will never have a perfect candidate for office; but we can settle on a pretty good candidate and take our chances that he will live out his term and act effectively, with the help of God. This is a fallen world, people.
FDT was never prochoice and each of your links claiming he was is a lie.
Every one of those links was shot down numerous times.
But you finally brought those links into this thread after being challenged multiple times. So now people can read through those threads and see you are a liar.
Stand by for your weekly a*s kicking pissant!
Yes. And now it’s affirmed. You are another that believes FDT was or is prochoice.
That’s all that needs to be seen.
I warned you not to stand near a natural gas line.
Dr. Dobson is a man with conviction who is supported, not by tax money, but by individuals who have been blessed and helped by his ministry, and who willingly contribute so that others, who want it, also have an opportunity to receive help.
What do you recommend? Maybe you would have the FCC order the FOTF radio programs removed from the airwaves so that Dr. Dobson can’t “push” anything on anyone.
Do you ever listen to any radio or TV talk shows featuring very outspoken men? (Rush, Haunt, Levine, Drudge, Savage, Boortz, or others?). Would you say that these men are “pushing” something on people?
Are you not now “pushing” on us the concept that no man’s morality should be introduced on a radio or TV set (?), that those who might appreciate men like Dr. Dobson should be denied his ministry?
If you ever happen upon the Focus On the Family radio broadcast, let me remind you that your radio has a couple of useful knobs or buttons. One will change the frequency, and one will cut the power off. So again, I ask, when Did Dr. Dobson ever push anything on you?
Federalism may be, in fact, one of those areas where I might disagree with Dr. Dobson — but how does that translate in your mind that the man is dishonest about his or his organization’s income, and would accept money from another candidate to not support Fred Thompson? And if you know so little about Dr. Dobson, then how did you come to know so much about his position.
Thank God for people in our nation who HAVE a morality. People that don’t, want to shove their lack therof on us. Historically, people with Dr. Dobson’s morality, along with the source of that morality were here F I R S T !! The founding fathers openly and publicly endorsed and recommended the source of Dr. Dobson’s mind set. That source is the Bible. We have recently posted eight pages of public quotes from our founders and presidents down to FDR that endorsed the values and principles of the Bible. Need we repost those eight pages and more? There are full volumes of them, published.
You are in no position to warn anyone of anything.
You have been exposed. That’s all that people need to know about you.
I only set forth the theory of why a marriage amendment has been proposed and why its proponents think it will work. I understand and sympathize with your frustration and hopelessness; but we must not allow it to keep us from trying to hold back the huge threat of atheist socialism deeply entrenched in our society. Persons of conscience have been asleep too long. The solution will never be political; there must be campaigns for hearts and minds regarding the superiority of natural man-woman faithful marriage and parenthood over synthetics like same-sex "open relationships", "partnering" and "parenting".
True, Rudy has fidelity issues but then so did billy jeff and it didn’t hurt him attracting the women’s vote. One difference, however. Rudy has never made a show of his religion, so unlike clinton, he can’t easily be accused of hypocrisy. In politics, it often seems that hypocrisy is a bigger issue than the underlying wrongdoing.
You may be right; time will tell. But I post for the benefit of any reader here pondering these Fred questions, not just for the one-issue extremists.
I'd be quite interested in a link to that post, please.
“. . . we must not allow [frustration and hopelessness] to keep us from trying to hold back the huge threat of atheist socialism deeply entrenched in our society. Persons of conscience have been asleep too long. The solution will never be political; there must be campaigns for hearts and minds regarding the superiority of natural man-woman faithful marriage and parenthood over synthetics like same-sex “open relationships”, “partnering” and “parenting”.”
Wonderful and helpful comments. Thank you!
whenever anyone speaks of their opinions, they are "pushing" an agenda. as i said in an earlier post, this man can say whatever he wishes. so can i.
i just think it's silly to reduce a presidential election in the current political era to the issue of a constitutional ban on gay marriage.
and i think it's irresponsible to do so in the way he did. he sent out a "personal" email. a personal email to millions of followers?
i'm happy for his success. good for him. but talk about things that actually matter for the future of this country. when it's all said and done, if the states have the right to decide on gay marriage the sun will still rise on america. and i would even guess that most states would agree with doctor dobson. but obviously he doesn't trust the state reps or even the state residents to make the "proper" choice.
but let's talk about terrorism, open borders and other aspects of national security.
and did doctor dobson actually go to medical school or should i be writing "Mr. Dobson, PhD"?
“...she won’t allow Mormons to pray with her and her gang on the National Day of Prayer”
Where and when did you hear/read that?!
You cannot put Dobson and Billy Graham in the same sentence..not and have any credibility.....and this is Not huge....this is..well, the only word I can think of is....silly. Who cares?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.