Posted on 09/19/2007 4:26:24 AM PDT by IrishMike
If Rooty Toot can beat Hitlery, then why did he refuse to run against her in 2000 and 2006? It's because he knew he would lose.
Why in the world would EITHER party ever nominate someone who couldn't win their home state? NOBODY HAS EVER WON A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WITHOUT WINNING THEIR HOME STATE.
What election did he lose?
Read the speech, he is advocating kicking liberal out of the party.
No. Flat out no. Rudy is an abortionist liberal. He’s disqualified from any consideration whatsoever to run on a conservative ticket. As I’ve already told you, FR is a conservative site and we will not be wasting our time or resources on liberal abortionist pigs. If you wish to promote liberal abortionist pigs, please do it elsewhere. Hope I’m being crystal clear on this matter. Don’t want to be ambiguous.
B/S.
My mistake. I forgot about Rudy having to withdraw from the race prior to the election.
Rudy is right in taking on MOVEON. They are seem to be a dangerious group that needs to be called on their actions and money. I knew a long time ago that moveon was going to be a force to be reckon with.
I've figured out that a lot of people in the Northeast and certain other predominantly liberal areas think that anyone even slightly to the right of Marx is a conservative.
Standing on your principle NOW, TODAY in the face of what looms ahead should we fail to keep the WH is wrong headed if standing on principle will lose the election and possibly mean the end of it all for America. If there were no raghead savages looking to kill us all and we weren't at war in Iraq to keep them from our shores then the other conservative issues of abortion and such could be debated in their proper context.
Simply put I would rather have a Republican in the WH who was weak on the illegals and had a history of being pro abortion (although he has said he is PERSONALLY against it and would love to see RvW overturned)and was strong on national defense and wants to win the WOT then a liberal who will cut and run at the first opportunity and get us all killed.
Finally, I am for whomever can beat fatso, it’s as simple as that.
LMFAO!
All Rooty Toot did was start a domino effect where the New York Slimes was able to sell more full-page ads in their rag. And he managed to move the new Chinagate scandal right off the front page.
Rooty's stunt last week HELPED Hitlery.
Once again, Rush is right.
The 2006 returns scared the hell out of party officials and elected officials from Sentors down to the dog catchers. It scared them so bad they'll do anything they can to avoid another drubbing.
Well, announcing your divorce on live tv during your campaign doesn't exactly help your polling numbers.
Being a realsit is not being a RINO. You need a dose of reality and foresight my friend.
Where the hell have you been? He dropped out in 2000 because he had Cancer and it makes sense he didn’t run in 2006 because he was palnning to run in 2008 for the WH.
Sheesh. How about showing a little back bone? We have qualified conservative candidates. We don’t need no stinking liberal abortionist pig to defeat Hillary.
All the more reason to nominate a conservative. You Rooty Rooters seem to operate under the illusion that Rooty is the only guy who wants the terrorists to lose. Maybe you should do some research on the career of a guy named Husband E. Kimmel and then get back to us on why failure should be rewarded.
We are also under attack from within by a political Party that has decided their assumption of power is justified by any means imaginable up to and including surrendering to the afore mentioned fanatics.
Rooty Toot is the same way and far more dangerous, because if the GOP is destroyed there will be genuine peril.
although he has said he is PERSONALLY against it and would love to see RvW overturned
EVERY pro-abortion candidate has made some version of the "safe and legal and rare" statement; however, Rooty has NEVER said he wanted Roe v. Wade overturned.
I am going to have to investigate this premise. I can’t wrap my mind around this. Sounds something Alexander the VI could have conspired to do...but JPII would have to be complicit...no way.
And that's the God's honest truth. A-m-e-n.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.