Posted on 09/03/2007 3:19:20 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
I remember that case, but I don't remember the specifics. I do remember he had been driving a car just before, or had been in the driver's seat or something. In any case, as mentioned, Ohio state law specifically states he doesn't have to show it. The law in the precedent was probably different.
Walmart and Best Buy check your receipt at the door; you know that going in.
If you don’t like it, don’t go in.
See how simple that is?
He was “arrested” as soon as the store stopped him from leaving. Not only was he arrested but so was his father when they stopped him from leaving and blocked his car. He might have a good false arrest claim against the store. That said the guy is a jerk.
“I have no problem letting the store check my receipts...”
I do have a problem with this. If they think I am shoplifting, let them charge me. If you are a member of Sam’s or Costco or other similar membership shopping clubs, you have given them the right to check your cart against your receipt. Otherwise, no.
Sue Circuit City, the perps who were the two employees involved, the cop and the city of Brocklyn, Ohio for false arrest.
I think we need to separate the issues here.
A lot of people don’t like being searched, but we all seem to agree that the answer is just to not shop there — certainly don’t shop there and then complain. May I suggest the small privately-owned stores where you never get searched if you walk from the cash register out the door. You generally get better service at such places anyway.
The issues here to me are: “Papers, please,” false arrest and unlawful detainment. Even the rights of a jackass can be violated.
Too simple for some people, apparently.
LOL this bozo should be charged for falsely calling 911 if nothing else. Your cries the CC employees were at fault instead are hilarious, as well as a perfect insight to how a liberal mind works.
“”Walmart and Best Buy check your receipt at the door; you know that going in.””
They only check some people, Walmart for instance has never checked my bags. ever.
Ohio Revised Statutes
2905.03 Unlawful restraint.They employees were clearly guilty of this crime for not allowing him to leave the parking lot. Plus they unlawfully restrained his father and siblings. They should have been arrested. The jackass in question was guilty of no crime, but was arrested. As the manager I wouldn't let him back in the store though.(A) No person, without privilege to do so, shall knowingly restrain another of his liberty.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of unlawful restraint, a misdemeanor of the third degree.
Effective Date: 01-01-1974
There’s an old cop saying when dealing with jerks like this, - “You may beat the rap but you won’t beat the ride”. It means that if you are going to be an ass the cop can seriously screw up your night. Even if he can’t make a charge stick, you still lose.
When Best Buy asked my friend for his receipt,
I remained silent;
I did not shop at Best Buy
When they asked for my father’s receipt at Office Depot,
I remained silent;
I did not shop at Office Depot.
When they asked to look in my brother’s bag at WalMart,
I did not speak out;
I was busy trying to get a lobster harmonica out of the claw machine.
When Circuit City asked ME for my receipt,
I got the ACLU to help me sue them.
See post #62.
I live in Ohio and have been in that CC store a number of times. They do the receipt checking at Home Depot all the time. The guy who marks the receipt often is standing right there watching the whole transaction. This means they don't trust their cashiers.
Sometimes the checker is not at the register but they never look in the bag. I have had my receipt marked a number of times but I have rarely if ever had anyone actually look in my bag. They just want to mark the receipt.
At BJs they make the appearance of checking the 125 items in my two shopping carts full, but it is just a show.
You can’t with Walmart either.
The police on the scene already charged this idiot instead, hopefully a charge for improperly paging 911will be tacked on as well.
So who changed the title of the thread, you in search of donations for the ACLU, or the moderator to show how ridiculous you look?
Is this a scam so that this guy can get money for himself or the ACLU?
“”You can’t with Walmart either.””
That just isn’t true.
What isn’t true?
If this a-hole prefers to shop where his package will not be checked against proof of purchase, he is free to go elswhere. The rest of us don’t mind helping in the war against shoplifting. A pox on him.
From his site:
“Q: How do I know this isn’t a scam to raise money?
A: You don’t. However, I urge you to learn about my reputation by reading these articles. Article #1, Article #2, Article #3.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.