Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China, Japan race for the moon
AP via Yahoo! ^ | 08/24/07 | HIROKO TABUCHI

Posted on 08/24/2007 10:35:03 AM PDT by Abathar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: TexasCajun
"I don't understand why the US has not found one good application for a Moon-base?"

Are you saying moon base Alpha wasn't real? Then where did they film that TV show? I thought Hollywood always filmed on location /s

21 posted on 08/24/2007 11:01:13 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

I hope they concentrate on mining the moon... We should focus on mining the oceans. More minerals and 1000 times easier - and cheaper - to get. Considering the difficulties inherent in space travel - including gravity wells and the lack of any atmosphere - we should really focus on resources that are readily available here.

Let Russia, China, and Japan fight over the moon. We’ll just take the entire Eastern half of the Pacific...


22 posted on 08/24/2007 11:05:57 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Tagline: Kinda like a chorus line but without the legs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Couldn’t agree more. Mars is a pointless excersie right now. The focus of the US space program should be a quick return to the moon with the establishment of a permanent manned settlement as soon as possible thereafter.

And yes can we all accept that the Moon Treaty is worthless. As soon as any country gets a permanent foothold they’re going to toss the treaty and claim the land.


23 posted on 08/24/2007 11:08:07 AM PDT by tdewey10 (Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

My money’s on Japan. I hear the food given to the Chinese astronauts can kill ya! And an hour later, it kills you again! [rimshot]


24 posted on 08/24/2007 11:09:58 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
"...Been there...done that...signed USA..."


'Nuff said!
25 posted on 08/24/2007 11:12:50 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (PUT AN END TO ORGANIZED CRIME. ABOLISH THE I.R.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Japan will win this new space race with a pirouette behind the back slam-dunk.
26 posted on 08/24/2007 11:16:07 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MD_Willington_1976

And Chinese space food???? Rat poison and bird flu FTL...


27 posted on 08/24/2007 11:16:23 AM PDT by Xenophon450 (They say it's lonely at the top, then I am as lonely as can be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

My money is on Japan...twice before China gets there once...


28 posted on 08/24/2007 11:16:58 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
Sheeze, they're going to fake-land there too now?
29 posted on 08/24/2007 11:18:59 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Been there...done that...signed USA

Been there ... abandoned that ... signed USA

30 posted on 08/24/2007 11:19:11 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

True enough.

But if you want to fabricate big, really big structures in space, you have to fabricate them off of the Earth’s surface. The Moon has titanium and unfiltered sunlight, two prime resources for microdeposition manufacturing. (Think of it as 3d lithography with a microwelding torch.)

Send the manufacturing machines to the Moon, combine them with freely available energy and raw materials to manufacture the parts. Cuts down tremendously from what you would have to haul up from Earth’s gravity well.


31 posted on 08/24/2007 11:24:37 AM PDT by Captain Rhino ( Peace based on respected strength is truly peace; peace based on weakness is ignoble slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
China going into space with its total disregard for safety, blowing up stuff and creating trash in the orbits of other satellites, is truly frightening.

You just can't hand a backward country technology and expect that they will have the good sense and morals to use it wisely!

32 posted on 08/24/2007 11:52:55 AM PDT by FixitGuy (By their fruits shall ye know them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Can the Reds even get that thing off the ground....with all the lead paint, who knows?


33 posted on 08/24/2007 11:54:14 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (1/27 Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

A question is the direction the next Admin will take. They could cut the manned return to the moon and the manned trip to Mars. They might leave robotics in the budget while cutting manned spaceflight altogether.


34 posted on 08/24/2007 11:56:57 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty rules. The 1984 Moon Treaty also rules most countries if not the USA, but claiming space resources is definitely out of the question.


35 posted on 08/24/2007 11:58:44 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

The USA did not sign the Moon Treaty, but it doesn’t matter since it signed (and sponsored) the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty. It’s over, Buck Rogers.


36 posted on 08/24/2007 12:00:43 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Been there...done that...signed USA

Leif Erikson might have said the same to the first English settlers, given the chance - but the people who came later and stayed were the ones who ended up with North America. Same with the moon - the fact that we were up there a few weeks total several decades ago means very little now next to a permanent base.
37 posted on 08/24/2007 12:02:54 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty rules. The 1984 Moon Treaty also rules most countries if not the USA, but claiming space resources is definitely out of the question.

These treaties will hit the circular file when there's money to be made and strategic advantage to be had.
38 posted on 08/24/2007 12:09:29 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Those are two separate issues.

Money to be made was in the world of the possible 30 years ago.


39 posted on 08/24/2007 12:20:54 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Money to be made was in the world of the possible 30 years ago.

From the moon? How so?
40 posted on 08/24/2007 12:24:12 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson