Posted on 08/02/2007 5:29:16 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
I have no intention of giving up continuing to look for a copy to rent, borrow or steal.
Even the Saudis, with their millions, can't neutralize the ownership of a book by an individual in a free society.
Just saying.
Two reasons: books are one of my passions, and Two: I despise the notion that, having enough money, anyone can cow and intimidate someone else from publishing a book. Any book.
Did I say I despise islam? The behavior, not the religion-cum-politics-cum-stifling-behavior-thingie.
Before details disappear, here are all the references. This part particularly encourages me in my seearch for a copy:
Also available in eBook format
There must be hundreds of copies out there...
Millard Burr,J. and Collins, R.O. (2006) Alms for Jihad: Charity and Terrorism in the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Hardback - ISBN-13: 9780521857307 | ISBN-10: 0521857309)
Description
Table of contents
Excerpt
Index
Copyright
Frontmatter
For all who are still interested.
(Prince) Khalid Bin Mahfouz is the muslim from Ireland(?) who successfully prevented the further sale of the book. More about this element of world-wide terrorism here...
Saudis are funding terrorism. What else is new? I don’t understand why this country treats them like royalty! Oh yes I do - they might get mad and cut off the flow of oil.
Within which is the following statement explaining why the courts supported the Sheik in his successful attempt to ban the book through the publisher:
"Throughout the book there are serious and defamatory allegations about yourself and your family, alleging support for terrorism through your businesses, family and charities, and directly.
"As a result of what we now know, we accept and acknowledge that all of those allegations about you and your family, businesses and charities are entirely and manifestly false."
Emphasis is mine.
This does not exclude the "indirectly" truth. With enough money, as many degrees of separation is easly bought to finance any perversion or evil imaginary.
By not suing the authors, this possible minor semantic legal trap, as well as the British legal system, were exploited by the man, without exposing himself to further legal scrutiny and the sordid factual details of the accusations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.