Steve Martin suddenly realizes that he is ... Bill O'Reilly. :)
I want to see those posts, if they exist, in their full context. He had better provide them to Kristinn as was promised to Kristinn or he is certainly a liar.
Steve Martin suddenly realizes that he is ... Bill O'Reilly. :)
BORe was merely trying a “fair and balanced” hit-n-run. I just saw the interview and was angry that he didn’t allow Kristinn to answer BORe’s ridiculous assertions and mis-statements. BORe should be ashamed of himself - if the “falafel king” is capable of such human fellings, that is!
I couldn’t find *any* quotes like that using Yahoo search.
Unless things are taken COMPLETELY out of context.
I say go ahead and call him on it...
Jim, those of us who have been here for years know better than to believe what he said tonight. I was channel surfing and recongized Kristin, so I stopped and couldn’t believe what I heard O’Reilly say.
Keep up the good work. You provide us a great service.
Agreed. It is unacceptable just to spout accusations without proof.
The big question is....How can anyone here ever believe anything the guy says? Now if he stretched the truth on this issue what else does he stretch?
Do you remember Dan Rather?
MM
I gave O’Reilly a lot of passes in the past, but I stopped after his treatment of the Swift Boat Veterans.
remember guys, hes looking out for you.
I watched the “factor” and caught the story, it seemed to me that “someone” cherry picked anything that they could find, and then he stated them on the air with no context.
A far cry from pictures of the President from the kosboyz, and the daily barrage of vitriol over there, if he wishes to be “fair and balanced” he should have provided context as well as when the posts were made, it sounded to me that he tried to say that stuff was posted Today.
I recorded his show tonight and am going to replay it verrrry slowwwwly so I can document exactly what was said. On a side note, I’ll offer one particular example of comments being made on your forum that would be classified as hateful and unacceptable and yet are allowed to stand. Those who stand up against that sort of hate speech are quickly ganged up on. You just might want to keep an eye on all of those posts that call for killing all Muslims when there are articles posted regarding terrorism, Iraq, etc. I’ve recently experienced that once again, and it is not uncommon.
I've seen very few post like that in my years here and the one's that I have I've never seen last more than 5 minutes without being pulled and the poster banned.
If BOR can't provide links he may go the way of Dan Rather.
And if he can provide links, and it is found the post were only up for a few minutes, it ought to make you wonder how he found them.
I don’t think he personally logged on. I seem to recall him using the “we” word (as in his staff), but wanting his audience to think that he was personally involved in the research.
I’ve never read anyone on FR say they hate blacks.
ORielly is at best an average entertainer. He must think there’s money to be made by attacking FR. He doesn’t like FR because many folks here can’t stand his wishy washy play both sides against the middle style. Yes, I’ll admit I’m one. Guess that’s hate speach too?
But I've only been here for 7 years,guess Bill O'Reilly knows more.
Gosh I hope you take him to court for slander.
I agree, in my short time here I’ve never seen posts like he read this evening.
I wish O'Reilly would be more careful with the stuff he says, such as the ridiculous statement he made about poor little Sean Hornbeck (the kid that was abducted in Missouri). O'Reilly claimed that Sean liked being tortured by that reprobate that abducted him. O'Reilly should police his owns words first.
Furthermore, if any such statements are posted to FR, they will be removed immediately as soon as he provides the links. O’Reilly attempts to use what might turn out to be one post in a million to paint the entire site as a hate site and our posters as racists. That is disingenuous reporting at best.