Posted on 07/22/2007 3:08:25 PM PDT by hardback
“Then you support abortion, correct? And you support partial birth abortion, correct?”
You support overreaction, correct? You hate kittens, correct?
throw=through
Can’t say I’m surprised. You know - birds of a feather, and all that.
From my observations: Jim doesn’t mind if you simply make your case for Rudy. But, as this is a conservative site, you should not be surprised if people jump on you for it.
And, since this is a conservative site, you should not make your case for Rudy by bashing Reagan and the Founding Fathers, as those banned in April were doing.
Is that close Jim?
Rudy is not a conservative. Neither are you.
There is no party if we just take our ball and go home. And no running third-party later if you can't get the GOP nod."
I guess... if one is a Republican. I actually am not, I am registered independent, but I usually, though not always, support the "R".
I'm really not a Party person.
I told you that you were insane.
“Reagan and the Founding Fathers”
I never bash either... ever. I wear a Reagan Tee-shirt around town. I was the last person I’ve seen to wear a Bush Cheney Tee-shirt to Trader Joe’s.
No, you are a ridicoulous ankle biter towing on to Rodney King and Jim Robinson to make yourself feel big.
You are a chiuaua... bark, bark... no get off my pant leg and catch a squirrel.
Yeah he does. He deserves the same scorn we heap on any other murdering abortionist, freedom robbing gay rights activist, constitution violating gun gabbing, sovereignty destroying socialist liberal. Even more so, because he would be the death of the conservative movement within the Republican party.
I didn't mean to imply that you did. But, back in April, a lot of the Giuliani crowd took to bashing Reagan and the Founding Fathers to try to make their guy not look so bad by comparison.
Not to be too technical, but I think he’s more a homo than a pedophile -— I believe his personal accusation he’s facing is sexually abusing a teenage boy. Many make the mistake of characterizing the sex scandals among the priesthood as being “pedophilia” when it reality, it’s really because the church opened the floodgates to gays being ordained, and they then became chicken hawks, preying on young men (rather than pre-pubescent children, per se).
“Yes, his actions after 9/11 demonstrated that he would make an excellent professional speechwriter or funeral-goer. President? Abso-freakin-lutely NOT!”
Fair enough, I was just defending him from this kind of headline. I got it.
I get it Jim. How is Fresno?
I didn't notice that you were anti-abortion or against partial birth abortions in either of those posts. Your friend Julie is for that evil. Like you, correct?
Those are his good points
bark*** bark**** grrrrr*** bark***
Giuliani must be strong (in fact he’s the strongest republican, the only one of truly national material) because the slander is getting beyond absurd.
“Well then, Jesus should’ve just hung around with the Upper-Crust. knothead.”
If I were presenting logic as deeply flawed as that, I’d be careful about commenting on the intelligence of others.
Firstly, moral rectitude and economic status are hardly synonymous. I’d venture to guess that there are more scumbags in the Kennedy clan alone than in the entire city of Pink, Oklahoma.
Secondly, as you may or may not have heard, Jesus was God. One can hardly draw a parallel between His association with publicans and sinners on the one hand, and the association of humans who share vices on the other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.