[VA Voter]

In honor of Gordon Brown's edict that the word Muslim or Islamic not be used in reference to terrorism, here is a politically correct alternative: "NABCHJS".

NABCHJS pronounced NAB CHIS

It stands for: Not Atheists Buddhists Christians Hindus Jews Seculars

Usage: The NABCHJS terrorists blew up a disco in downtown London last night.

Cheers,

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

"The trouble with looking for bland words is that you lose touch with reality."

Ignore political correctness and you should be OK.

[William Terrell]

Of course, since a name is tainted by behavior, any other name given will be tainted by the same behavior. You don't change the name; you change the behavior.

Duh.

[theBuckwheat]

>>
If it were proved that highly qualified, ambitious doctors were Islamist mass-murder plotters, it would put a hole through another comforting theory - that this is “all about” under-employed young men of low self-esteem and educational attainments.
<<

Let the Islamists describe themselves: what is wrong with “jihadist”, a word they themselves use?

Putting aside that the MSM seems to be devoting more energy worrying that Romney (but not Redi) is LDS, it is good to see more and more people are being quoted as poking fun at the now-silly attempts by politicians to posture they way they do.

By not having clarity of language about the pervasive nature of the jihadist threat, people such as Brown are in effect trying to sustain an unsustainable lie. This is a curiosity because on other subjects, such as energy usage, the left loves to self-righteously scold us on the subject of “sustainability”. Brown’s lie is not sustainable.

The fact that candidate Mitt Romney is LDS leads the MSM to worry (in the subtle ways they have honed to an art form) that his religion might color his executive decisions and he thus might “impose” LDS beliefs on the country. Yet the central motivation of jihadists is to demand the West adopt their religion. Imposing Islam comes via the Three Demands they make of us: convert, submit or die.

It should be very strange that the MSM sees Romney as a threat, while (beyond those directly killed in the bombings) jihadists are not. What calculus leads a person to this conclusion? I can only speculate that self-loathing on the part of the Left leads them to hate the moral framework that is the basis of the western culture and they hope to find relief in any cultural framework other than the west. Maybe, at this time, and not having to live under it, they think they would welcome life under Islam, where a person only must submit and obey, where they don’t have to think about their beliefs. Little do they realize the destruction of lives and prosperity this would cause.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

The side that can control the language of the other wins.

So, Islamist is NOT out. Nor is Islamofascist or Islamonazi.

And the commie pinko left in this country that supports them because they are against America and western civ are a bunch of commie pinkos.

The Islamist murderers can go to hell with their attempt to terrorize us out of using our freedom.

Let’s get down to full scale open warfare with these demented fascists and get it over with.

[samtheman]

They are what they are: Muslims.

Plain and simple.

Muslims kill.

Muslims maim.

Muslims torture.

Muslims enslave.

The world over.

Everywhere there are Muslims there are women in chains and people in early graves.

Muslims.

Muslims.

Muslims.

(Did I mention they were Muslims?)

[Gorzaloon]

"If 'Islamist' is out, what do we call them?"

Vermin.

[popdonnelly]

How about Fascists? That’s descriptive, and even our Leftist friends can understand it.

[The Great RJ]

Call them what they are, Islamic Fascists. However to be PC how about Mazis...Muslim Nazis?

[TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl]

If 'Islamist' is out, what do we call them?

Late for chow?

[pacelvi]

I use the term Jihadi. This term has the advantage of not needing the standard 4968429428 word disclaimer that not all Jihadis are terrorists.. because , well.. all of them are.

[G Larry]

“OTN” = Other Than Normal

[Verloona Ti]

I like the phrase “Koranimals”. I believe it was coined either here or on LGF. Succinct and to the point.

[G Larry]

Human reality:
Another major terrorist attack or series of disruptive attacks will result in severe vigilantism.
Political reality:
Leaders see this coming and want minimize the possibility.
Possible but unlikely solution:
If there are “moderate Muslims” they must come out NOW and denounce terrorist acts and methods wherever and whenever they occur.
Prediction:
Terrorist acts will become severe and frequent enough to drive an extended, violent reaction.

[realcleanguy]

Ah, Yes, we must try to show our love and tolerance of those who would do anything to kill people.

Let’s see:

Mohammebombs

Ahksplosives

Jihbombists

Allabombists

Allahkillers

MeccaMunitionists

Al Asqa Bodyparts inc.

You know, if they want to die for allah the moon god, why don’t they just jump in front of a bus?

[PISANO]

We could address the Islamists perps who commit these acts of terrorism something like this:

Today a member of the "RELIGION of PEACE" donned a suicide vest and committed mass murder in a market place full of women and children. Ali Abu [or whoever] a member of the RELIGION of PEACE shouted Allahu Akbar right before he detonated the bomb, killing 55 women and children.

The RELIGION of PEACE has claimed responsibility for this horrendous act on it's website.

And in a statement by OBL, a member of the RELIGION of PEACE, he said that the killing of women and children is necessary to punish the infidels until all bow to Allah and join the "RELIGION of PEACE".

[Noumenon]

I’d just liketo call them ‘dead’.

[denydenydeny]

the historian Eric Hobsbawm

A longtime Communist.

[sourcery]

If 'Islamist' is out, what do we call them?

Terrorislamist.