Posted on 06/21/2007 6:57:50 AM PDT by DBCJR
The concept of annulment is found within marriage itself, because a valid marriage requires the free consent of both parties. If one of the parties cannot consent because that party is mentally impaired or forced at gunpoint (to give two extreme examples), that marriage, although facially valid, would be subject to annulment because of a failure of consent. It is not divorce, but simply a recognition that the element of consent was lacking, and an acknowledgment that a true marriage did not take place.
I have no idea whether the Church of Christ, or some individual Church, conflates the concepts of divorce and annulment. I do not even contend that there was a failure of consent in Fred Thompson’s first marriage that would subject it to annulment. I do not know. I only observe that, because of their very young age and the pregnancy, this marriage might well be one in which the requisite consent was lacking. If that were the case, the marriage would be invalid, and Fred Thompson would be considered by many churches to be in his first marriage.
Hillary Methodist
Guiliani Roman Catholic
McCain Episcopalian
Edwards Methodist
You said it........
This is a big “yawner”.......
Edwards and Hillary are both United Methodist,
Same with us Southern Baptists
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.