Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Wrongs - How about cracking down on illegals, not conservatives?
National Review ^ | June 4, 2007 | Brian Darling

Posted on 06/04/2007 8:11:22 AM PDT by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Well said.
1 posted on 06/04/2007 8:11:27 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Zakeet

Good article, but unfortunately it’s more politically correct for President Bush and other high ranking Republicans to trash Conservatives than it is to talk about arresting criminals.


3 posted on 06/04/2007 8:18:40 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

This amnesty is worse than Carters Mariel boatlift.


4 posted on 06/04/2007 8:23:45 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

A FIRESTORM is a brewin’...


5 posted on 06/04/2007 8:24:55 AM PDT by Edgerunner (If leftists don't like it, I do. Keep your powder dry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
This amnesty is worse than Carters Mariel boatlift.

True, but Carter gave away the Panama Canal. I'm not sure what Bush could give away (besides our sovereignty)...
6 posted on 06/04/2007 8:25:45 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

How can you expect those who’ve come here illegally and ignored our current laws to begin following the new ones, especially if there’s anything punitive about them? Is the new legislation a sign of renewed Federal financial responsibility or will all of the costs of the new program be mandated to the states to pay as is the current practice? I’m hearing from the pols that “the system is broke, we need a new system” instead of “we need to re-invigorate our current system with an injection of enthusiasm and resources”. We also need to insist that Mexico quit making their problem our problem.


7 posted on 06/04/2007 8:27:03 AM PDT by vigilence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Throw in this "immigration" amnesty thing, and I believe the "43" administration will go down as one of the most disastrous in our modern history. At least he's been better than Carter in foreign policy...

I told a co-worker this last week - Carter and Bush are the most disastrous admins in U.S. history. We're still feeling the effects of the Carter presidency, and we'll feel the negative impact of Bush immigration policy for decades (maybe generations).

Clinton was a scandalous president, his policies didn't have the long term negative impact of Carter-Bush.

8 posted on 06/04/2007 8:27:03 AM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete
Clinton was a scandalous president, his policies didn't have the long term negative impact of Carter-Bush.

Considering that he gave the Chinese the ability to build MIRV-ed ICBMs, I'm not too sure about that.

9 posted on 06/04/2007 8:31:12 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
What I find most insulting is that the Pro-illegal side wants us to to mindlessly accept a bunch of new and clearly unenforceable laws (there is no gov’t competence, capacity, or will) after 21 years of willful dereliction of duty.
10 posted on 06/04/2007 8:33:38 AM PDT by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
True, but Carter gave away the Panama Canal. I'm not sure what Bush could give away (besides our sovereignty)...

I'm afraid that he's working on it.

I agree with him on the WOT and we scored on the SC Justices. And taxes. Beyond that..............I'm skeert. I just don't understand a man that comprehends the importance of striking back at terrorists but wants to open our southern border.

11 posted on 06/04/2007 8:34:51 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete
Clinton was a scandalous president, his policies didn't have the long term negative impact of Carter-Bush.

Not quite true. He ignored terrorist attacks and they escalated. Plus his friendship with the Chinese hasn't all come to fruition yet. Crap/poison in our products from China is just the beginning.

12 posted on 06/04/2007 8:38:23 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Sorry Mr. President....YOUR amnesty bill is a train wreck for the average American!


13 posted on 06/04/2007 8:42:36 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
I agree with him on the WOT and we scored on the SC Justices. And taxes. Beyond that..............I'm skeert. I just don't understand a man that comprehends the importance of striking back at terrorists but wants to open our southern border.

I consider him a failure in the WOT as I consider our physical security (i.e. the southern border) to be very important in keeping terrorists out. Unlike Mexico, Canada is right in the middle of things with us in Afghanistan, and have beefed up their security at their entry points (airports, seaports) substantially, while it's in Mexico's best interest to keep our southern border as wide open as possible.
14 posted on 06/04/2007 8:42:36 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
I'm not sure what Bush could give away (besides our sovereignty)...

Give him time, he's working on it. I've read some who believe there are those working to unite the U.S., Mexico & Canada into a North American Union. I try not to believe it but this administration sure acts like that's the case.

15 posted on 06/04/2007 8:42:46 AM PDT by Smittie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

But George Bush’s arrogance will not allow him to see the truth. Even if it weren’t true, he won’t bend to the will of the people. He will destroy the Republican party—which perhaps is a good thing. But in the process, he’ll guarantee the election of a hard core Marxist in ‘08—and the beginning of the darkest days of our Republic.

Of course, and this is tangential, he doesn’t care about that either. It doesn’t affect him. He has enough personal assets that his standard of living won’t be affected.


16 posted on 06/04/2007 8:43:17 AM PDT by IndySecurityMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
With all due respect, he and Sen. Kennedy are wrong about consequences and effects

Didn't the Pres. learn anything about co-dependency in rehab?

George Bush - The Enabler

17 posted on 06/04/2007 8:43:26 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (Ah don't feeeeel no ways taihrd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
There is no such thing as a comprehensive background check on Americans. So you certainly can't find out if a person from Mexico or South America has a criminal history.

In the US, a person going to work where they handle a lot of sensitive government information usually has to go through a door knock background check. Someone gets on the ground and talks to previous employers, neighbors, etc. Why? Because I say above there is no such thing as a comprehensive background check.

In many states the county level criminal conviction data never gets to the statewide system which means that THAT data never gets in to the nationwide systems such as NCIC.

The criminal background check part of this idiot bill is a farce!

As far as I'm concerned Bush can stay in Europe. I have no use for him here anymore.

18 posted on 06/04/2007 8:46:39 AM PDT by heywaitadarnminute (This post happens between 12 AM and 12 PM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The fate of the immigration bill comes down to Senate Republicans’ leader, Mitch McConnell........”The only thing that can save us now is if McConnell made an appeal to Republicans that this thing is out of control and we need to step back from it.......”said Sen. Jim DeMint, South Carolina Republican. “He could do that....”..... Debate on the bill resumes today, and Republican leaders will have to decide quickly...........snipped from:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1844535/posts

Jam McConnell’s phone today. Be polite.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1844535/posts#6

McConnell, Mitch- (R - KY)
361-A RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2541

mcconnell.senate.gov/contact_form.cfm


19 posted on 06/04/2007 8:46:46 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson