Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USA : Post-NAFTA job loss in textiles & apparel exceeds 1mn
American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition ^ | June 2, 2007 | American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition press release

Posted on 06/02/2007 6:11:50 AM PDT by USconvoy.com

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: Toddsterpatriot; snowsislander
Despite these losses, the sector continues to employ 547,800 illegal aliens. Just how does that help America?
81 posted on 06/05/2007 6:32:15 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
So this, doesn't bother you?

the U.S. textile and apparel manufacturing sector now has lost 1,001,100 jobs

Because they were all illegals?

You never told me if the WTO is an all powerful sovereignty stealer or a toothless weakling? LOL!

82 posted on 06/05/2007 6:35:41 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Huh? Higher productivity in the US means that even if rent, taxes, salaries etc. are higher, unit costs could still be lower.

Not if the market isn't big enough to support that level of productivity.

Minute Maid might be able to sell a glass of lemonade for a penny as opposed to 25 cents from the kid on the corner, but if the market only calls for a hundred glasses of lemonade Minute Maid's facilities are useless.

What you can't do is claim a glass of lemonade is only worth a penny when market demand won't support a Minute Maid. If it's not that big, then by God a glass of lemonade is worth 25 cents.

Protectionists want me to pay higher prices instead of allowing me to put money in my kid's college fund.

No, protectionists want you to pay for what you imposed on other Americans producing the things you want; not impose it on them, then go to those who don't have to pay such overhead and claim it's "competition."

83 posted on 06/05/2007 6:49:45 PM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Not if the market isn't big enough to support that level of productivity.

Why would you produce more units than the market wants to buy?

No, protectionists want you to pay for what you imposed on other Americans producing the things you want;

What have I "imposed on other Americans producing the things I want"?

84 posted on 06/05/2007 7:01:33 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

“free traders” are forcing taxpayers to pay for illegal aliens to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars.

Don’t you want to protect your fellow Americans from this type of abuse? Or do your loyalties lie with foreign countries, like Senator Feinstein and China?


85 posted on 06/05/2007 7:55:00 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Why would you produce more units than the market wants to buy?

Your studied dissembling makes it obvious you've infered where the philosophical landmines are, and are studiously avoiding them.

That you're doing so without admitting the merits of my self-evident points is a measure of your intellectual dishonestly.

We're done here.

86 posted on 06/06/2007 9:12:21 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Who are you...and why should I care?


87 posted on 06/06/2007 9:13:48 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
What have I "imposed on other Americans producing the things I want"?

Or you could just run away.

88 posted on 06/06/2007 9:14:54 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia

“Clothes are not strategic industries like aircraft and steel.”

Well, aircraft are next. Stephen Udvar-Hazy, head of International Lease Finance, one of the largest commercial aircraft purchasers, has said that “aircraft are too expensive”.


89 posted on 06/06/2007 10:49:38 AM PDT by BikerJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe

We had better never lose Boeing and Lockheed. Lockheed is now only a military contractor, but both are very important for our strategic base.


90 posted on 06/06/2007 12:44:28 PM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson