Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elect president by popular vote? State senate signs on
The News & Observer ^ | May 15, 2007 | Dan Kane, Staff Writer

Posted on 05/17/2007 1:39:48 PM PDT by SuperSonic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: deport
The Death of Voting in North Carolina
41 posted on 05/18/2007 4:51:29 AM PDT by SuperSonic (Bush "lied", people dyed.......their fingers purple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SuperSonic
Another thread (which I missed earlier) on this subject:

N.C. Bill Seeks to Elect President by Popular Vote

The N.C. Senate version of the bill:

NC Senate Bill 954

42 posted on 05/18/2007 5:00:31 AM PDT by SuperSonic (Bush "lied", people dyed.......their fingers purple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RonF

It’s not unconstitutional if it has the consent of Congress. And a Democrat controlled Congress will be tripping over themselves to do anything that will give them the presidency.


43 posted on 05/18/2007 5:42:26 AM PDT by SuperSonic (Bush "lied", people dyed.......their fingers purple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SuperSonic

It’s not unconstitutional if it has the consent of Congress. And a Democrat controlled Congress will be tripping over themselves to do anything that will give them the presidency.


It’s a distinct possibility that Congress would consent. I don’t understand why people would think Congress wouldn’t.

In addition, who knows how SCOTUS would rule should enough states agree to such a procedure with or without Congress’s consent.


44 posted on 05/18/2007 7:54:47 AM PDT by deport ( Cue Spooky Music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Vision

Yes, but they only adhere to it if a majority of the other states do the same thing. And so far, they haven’t.

Although, as a MD resident, I’d love to see the sh*t-fits the State throws when Maryland votes Dem and a Republican wins the national popular vote...and they have to send in electors who will cast their votes for the Republican!


45 posted on 05/18/2007 7:59:36 AM PDT by RockinRight (I might be a FRedneck...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

NC is trying to pass the same legislation. It’s happening.

In 2004, Maryland would have been red.


46 posted on 05/18/2007 8:04:43 AM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Vision

It is. Although, for the next few election cycles, I think it’s mostly pandering. MD can (and did) pass it. I don’t think NC could.

I don’t get it though - these Dems are passing legislation that would’ve given Bush a landslide victory in 2004.


47 posted on 05/18/2007 8:08:29 AM PDT by RockinRight (I might be a FRedneck...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SuperSonic; deport

Maybe so. But it’s not even in front of Congress at this point. An example would be the Great Lakes water usage agreement (I don’t know the formal name of the Act). It’s actually an international treaty among the states and Canadian provinces bordering the Great Lakes regarding how much water each state or province can take out and how they control what’s flowing in. Specifics are negotiated among the states and provinces, but it needed Congressional approval to set up in the first place.

So far, Congress is not involved in this compact among the states at all and there seems to be no intent to do so. That’s unconstitutional from what I can see. And while it would likely pass the House, there’s a real chance it wouldn’t pass the Senate; the interests of the smaller and/or less urban states might just cross over partisan lines enough to have it fail there.


48 posted on 05/18/2007 8:21:34 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson