Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
That was really great news. We can thank everyone who helped seat Alito and Roberts for that, from the swift boat vets to the Federalist Society.
With Rudy, everything will go awry.
Papasmurf, I love your graphic. Consider it borrowed.
They are defeatists, who think conservatism is dead, that america just won’t support the right way, and that the best we can hope for is to trick them into voting for a candidate of ours that will do at least a little of what is right for the country.
I didn’t understand your question, woofie. Probably because I’ve been up since 5:00 a.m. :-)
Did you notice that the speech was at the G.H.W. Bush Library? I guess you also missed that Romney and McCain had previously spoken there as well.
I will let you know, I disagree with you very much about Rudy's history, qualifications, and ability to beat the Beast.
We need a Conservative to beat the dem nominee. (It will not be the Beast. IMHO)
“It is really very simple. A Rudy victory with or without conservative support will totally destroy the conservative movement”
Stop right there......
We have the post of the night!
“Because the concept of loyalty eludes some people - selfish people, that is.”
Do you mean “loyalty”, as in “poppy” bush being disloyal to the conservative base that gave him a landslide first time around?
Loyalty is a two way street - if you get it based on promises you made, and then fail to be loyal by keeping those promises, you can’t whine “gee, why aren’t they loyal to me???!”
A wonderful post and dead on accurate.
I second this, Trussell
You are such an idiot.
I give up, who?
Test
You don’t convince the country that conservatism is the only correct path by giving them a non-conservative for President.
And a liar to boot.
The answer to your question is: Yes, in the America of the Founding Fathers life was held to begin at “quickening” - which was roughly the fourth month of pregnancy. Ergo, abortion was not illegal in the first trimester and was frequently performed.
I don’t mean to be flip, but I’ll give it serious thought the second freepers make serious posts about why we should consider social issues more important than national security and fiscal restraint issues.
If this nation isn’t secure from jihadists (Muslims are breeding at a rate 7 times that of the rest of the world population), within a decade or so, we’re not going to be talking about abortion at all because we’ll be too busy dodging truck bombs at Home Depot.
If this nation doesn’t get a handle on entitlement spending (that battle has already been lost, imo, but Rudy just might be the man to take it on), then France is going to look like a paradise compared to the US in terms of socialist spending.
What am I lying about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.