Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[IslandJeff]

Note the signup date, SY.

It will, indeed get better. It always does.

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>Whatever happened to agreeing to disagree?

Whatever happened to Zeroisanumber?

Zotted!

[Elyse]

The ad hominem attacks are totally uncalled for. He likes Rudy, you don't. Somehow that makes him disgusting. Interesting.

My ad hominem attack?! Pay attention! The guy was just banned for saying Cheney was drunk when he had his hunting accident. My comment had nothing to do with who I support, unlike his attack on Cheney!

[SeaBiscuit]

BTTT

[SittinYonder]

Whose signup date?

[IslandJeff]

JW’s. Already pinging folks, and has been on a total of three threads.

[Elyse]

Whatever happened to agreeing to disagree?

I'm not going to sit here and agree to disagree when I see a Rudy supporter slandering another conservative in order to bring the conservative down lower than Rudy.

[EternalVigilance]

I think the “ZeroformerlyknownasaNumber” wanted to be zotted, and that he got his wish.

Keep up the good work, Reagan Man.

[Politicalmom]

So who do you think he is a re-tread of?

[Reagan Man]

Hello my FRiend.

What a great thread. ;^) Woohoo

[IslandJeff]

No idea, PM. I just think this eagerness to ban supporters (and other long-term FRiends of the forum, with apparent exhibited semantic relish) of one Republican candidate (on a 6000+ post thread) could, potentially, invite folks onto the forum who might not, possibly, be working for the objectives of the forum.

Just sayin’.

[RunningWolf]

No prob with chewing on the ‘Wolf ass anytime RA. With your Quals, no apology ever needed. Besides you are pretty hard/clean about it

Salute to your service. You guys cover the sky and space, and the ‘Wolves will cover you down on terra firma.

And as far as those other arguments, I suggest several mass getogethers full of people, food, liquor and a little debauchery. That all seems a common theme either side of the aisle :-)

Again, Salute

[jedward]

I’m very well aware of which posts I responded to and conversly. It’s not hard to track back. I made a post to zeroisanumber and you answered it and took it from there. You could have opposed either your view or his, but didn’t.

You had how many chances to disagree? I even asked you if you disagreed with me. I even put it into the context you two were discussing. Maybe you just didn’t make your point. I can’t disagree with you because you haven’t said anything. You’re carrying on about banning and vitriol, etc.. Debate your point, or simply don’t answer someone elses post, would be something to consider.

[Politicalmom]

Well, that account was started well before any of these bannings, so probably not a reaction, anyway.

But I think it smacks of a re-tread.

[jedward]

JW’s ?

[IslandJeff]

Sorry. “Jedward’s”. Shorthand and all that.

[jedward]

what is a re-tread?

[advertising guy]

if the LORD found need to duplicate the flood, you and yours would get a seat in the ARK.

(sneak a satellite phone this time so we can find it after)

[jedward]

Ohhh...ok, you guys mistook a several year lurker for an old poster. Ok, I get it.

[IslandJeff]

I assumed nothing, JW. Newer signups always invite a little extra scruitiny, that’s all. Carry on.