Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[68 grunt]

Kinda close to home, huh, dirt?

[LdSentinal]

Rudophiles as an aconym for pedophiles? That’s beyond pathetic.

[OMalley]

Ditto!

[del4hope]

Since folks don’t come much more conservative than me, of course I would NEVER support a candidate such as Rudy.

So far Thompson, Hunter, and Tancredo have appeared to be the most conservative, but there is alot of time to wait and see who I do support. I have not dug my heals in on one candidate, but I think my tagline should make it clear as to who I won’t support.

Sorry if my posts have not been clear enough.

[metmom]

Sorry, my mistake. Don’t blame CWCT. There is a central scrutinizer, with a *z* that comes up with no posting history. I had heard he was banned and checked the *z* one. If it’s simply misspelled, it comes up with *The requested document does not exist on this server.*

Anyway, I alerted him to that and CWCT took my word for it. I thought I checked carefully enough. I didn’t know there were two FReepers with such similar names.

My apologies, especially to central scrutiniser, with an *s*.

[EternalVigilance]

So, you’re now supporting Duncun Hunter?

Awesome. He’s a great American.

Maybe there’s hope for you yet.

But, weren’t you ridiculing him awhile back? Or was that someone else?

[Jim Robinson]

No, I’m afraid I’ll leave the snooping through records and building opposition dossiers on private citizens to you and yours.

[processing please hold]

Dear Sponsor,

I have failed my first test. I did not log off. :-(

I'll let you have the cheesecake, I'll bring a bag of Oreo's and a case of Diet Cokes. That will cancel out the cookies calories. That really works...doesn't it?

*Glancing over my shoulder-no, it doesn't work, but it's a pleasant thought.*

[Crawdad]

This thread is awesome.

[Bigh4u2]

Del4hope doesn’t support Guiliani.

Neither do I. Or ever would support a ‘liberal’ in ‘Conservative’ clothing.

[68 grunt]

A _’phile’ is someone who is facinated with sumtin, like an audiophile or stereophile or sumtin.

[garv]

Why is it that everyone seems to think they need to go out in some idiotic blaze of glory? News flash, if you had simply never posted again there wouldn't have been any cyber search parties. No one would have noticed.

For some reason you all think your indispensable when, in reality, you don't amount to a pimple on the ass of FR.

[processing please hold]

filled with sound and fury, yet signifying absolutely nothing

*rolls eyes* Shakespeare? At least be original in your possible opus.

[Bigh4u2]

OOoops!

I see you answered already.

Oh, well. Doesn’t hurt to have ‘back up’ once in a while.

:0)

[EternalVigilance]

Ooh-rah!

[perfect_rovian_storm]

What is the WideAwake site?

(sorry, it’s a looooong thread! lol)

[rbmillerjr]

It is so true that if you give a liberal the open mike or board and let him talk, he will eventually hang himself. LOL...boy are these RudyBots going to be surprised. They are soooooooo certain that those polls won’t change lmao.

They are jumping on board like good Party Hacks to get those low level campaign jobs and hopefully a schedule C political appointment in WashDC. They are going to be in for a piznvinegar surprise and they deserve every bit of it.

[LdSentinal]

Dictionaries are cool.

[Delphinium]

I'd say that it was all you so who are so obsessed with liberal Rudy that some of you stooped to lies to promte him on FR.

And it angered you all that some of us called you on the lies.

Fierce Alligience was affective because he used great humor to counter you all, and that is the reason some of your Rudy obsessed fans pushed to get him banned.

[OMalley]

Dearest Sponsor!

I too have failed my first and second test!!

Ill bypass the cheesecake if we can make it oreos with skim milk instead (that still balances out the cookie calories, right)?lol!

*looks sheepishly at pph...If we eat standing up, there are NO calories*!!