Skip to comments.
1994 Rudy: "I will work as hard to protect.. right to believe in God ..or not to believe in God."
The Brody File ^
| April 12, 2007
| David Brody thebrodyfile@gmail.com
Posted on 04/12/2007 8:22:49 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-209 next last
To: GenuineChocolateFace
To: wagglebee
I know all about historical trends. I remember when the person elected president was always the candidate who won the New Hampshire Primary, too.
To: dirtboy
The problem is with your argument is that the person you are supporting has a huge number of liberal positions and past actions that, if they were in a Democrat, you would oppose instead of spin away.Then you should be thrilled with every opportunity I present to plead your case.
To: GenuineChocolateFace
Did you actually know the last two that I posted? Because, I just did the research last week and I’ve never seen them talked about anywhere.
124
posted on
04/12/2007 9:57:22 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: GenuineChocolateFace
The May 3rd debate on MSNBC should be telling (Hunter, Giuliani, Paul, Romney, Gilmore, McCain, Brownback, Huckabee, and T. Thompson will be in attendance, IIRC). That’ll be where the wheat will be separated from the chaffe.
125
posted on
04/12/2007 9:58:39 AM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Definitely a MUST SEE event.
126
posted on
04/12/2007 9:59:35 AM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Future Former Freeper)
To: wagglebee
It’s interesting, trendwise, certainly. I wasn’t aware of those, no. But like I said, historical trends aren’t written in stone - Bill Clinton’s disasterous showing in New Hampshire in 92 is a good example.
To: Ultra Sonic 007
The May 3rd debate on MSNBC should be telling (Hunter, Giuliani, Paul, Romney, Gilmore, McCain, Brownback, Huckabee, and T. Thompson will be in attendance, IIRC). Thatll be where the wheat will be separated from the chaffe. Well, at least none of them are too scared to go on MSNBC ;)
To: GenuineChocolateFace
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I believe most people have doubts. To say differently says we're not human.Many or most Christian believers I know well would tell you they have no doubts. Are they liars (maybe just "misguided")? Are they arrogant?
Regardless, I think it's safe to say the martyrs had no doubts. And yes, I would argue such faith is inhuman. "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God." (Eph. 2:8)
130
posted on
04/12/2007 10:04:11 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
People that threaten expulsion from FR because they disagree with you on something make themselves look bad.Except that wasn't what was being discussed. You said this:
Since when did this stop being a discussion board and start being the land of the lock-step?
and I said this:
Did you ever object to JimRob tossing liberal Dems off FR when they tried to post here?
In other words, if a pro-abort, anti-gun gay rights liberal tried to post here this time last year, you would have no problem with that viewpoint not being allowed.
But when YOUR GUY has those viewpoints, all of a sudden you're calling FR "lock-step". And that is pure hypocrisy.
131
posted on
04/12/2007 10:05:17 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: GenuineChocolateFace
Like how “John Hillabama” refused to appear on a FOX NEWS debate. ;D
132
posted on
04/12/2007 10:06:11 AM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Then you should be thrilled with every opportunity I present to plead your case.Not exactly.
It gets tiresome dealing with the same discredited Rudy talking points time and time again. Admit it - he's a pro-abort, gun-grabbing liberal pubbie. Then at least the discussion could be about whether that is a good direction for the GOP to be doing.
133
posted on
04/12/2007 10:07:00 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: Cincinatus' Wife; dirtboy
Forgive me.Maybe she meant this one for you, dirtboy.
134
posted on
04/12/2007 10:07:32 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I will work hard to vote for Rudy’s opponent.
To: usslsm51
I will work hard to vote for Rudys opponent.Before or after the primaries?
137
posted on
04/12/2007 10:14:19 AM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Future Former Freeper)
To: usslsm51
I will work hard to vote for Rudys opponent. Hussein Obama, Hillery, or SilkyBoy? ;)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
...But, if anyone says it's arrogant to have no doubts about one's own beliefs, I'd have to say he's wrong.
I believe most people have doubts. To say differently says we're not human. Not human, or in denial.
To: LimberJim
Impressed? How, favorably or unfavorably?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-209 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson