Skip to comments.
Rape verdict overturned after 10 years in prison
Waterbury Republican-American ^
| April 10, 2007
| Annabelle Garay (A.P.)
Posted on 04/10/2007 7:11:43 AM PDT by Graybeard58
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: Graybeard58
Impossible. Every FReeper knows that in our system of justice the innocent are always exonerated and the convictions are always immaculate.
I think of those here who suggest they should have just shot the guy immediately upon conviction.
To: Graybeard58
Giles, who left with courtroom with a smile, said he doesn't hold a grudge against the state. The judge complimented him on his positive attitude about his ordeal.He's a better man than me, 10 yrs of my life wasted for nothing, locked in a cell. Don't think I could have a positive attitude.
3
posted on
04/10/2007 7:19:18 AM PDT
by
lovecraft
(Specialization is for insects.)
To: Monk Dimittis
He’s probably guilty of something else. Hang him.
4
posted on
04/10/2007 7:22:09 AM PDT
by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters!)
To: Monk Dimittis
It is more than a tragedy when an innocent is convicted. It is a travesty when a guilty escapes conviction. No system is perfect. Look at that scumbag Nifong.
5
posted on
04/10/2007 7:22:41 AM PDT
by
Dudoight
To: Graybeard58
Giles, who left with courtroom with a smile, said he doesn't hold a grudge against the state. The judge complimented him on his positive attitude about his ordeal.
Then he's a better man than I.
6
posted on
04/10/2007 7:23:35 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: Graybeard58
Police eventually arrested James Curtis Giles, who lived 25 miles away and did not match the description of the attacker given by the rape victim, Potkin said. Giles was about 10 years older and had gold teeth. Investigators ignored another man with a similar name: James Earl Giles. That Giles lived across the street from the victim and had previously been arrested with Brown on other charge
Yep, that's the Dallas County DA, all right...
7
posted on
04/10/2007 7:24:25 AM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: Monk Dimittis
I think of those here who suggest they should have just shot the guy immediately upon conviction.
You won't have to think of them long, because I'm sure they'll be along shortly...
8
posted on
04/10/2007 7:25:30 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: B-Chan
Hey, they got somebody, the name was similar..... Close enough.
9
posted on
04/10/2007 7:26:19 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Dudoight
It is more than a tragedy when an innocent is convicted. It is a travesty when a guilty escapes conviction.
If we must err then, it is preferable that we err towards the guilty escaping than the innocent being caught.
10
posted on
04/10/2007 7:26:59 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: JamesP81
It is more than a tragedy when an innocent is convicted. It is a travesty when a guilty escapes conviction. No system is perfect. Look at that scumbag Nifong. So which is worse, a "more than a tragedy" or a "travesty"?
In my opinion, as much as I hate to see it happen, it's better to let the guilty free than to imprison the innocent each and every time.
11
posted on
04/10/2007 7:27:19 AM PDT
by
CT-Freeper
(Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
To: Graybeard58
Good thing he doesn’t live in Durham, where DNA doesn’t matter.
12
posted on
04/10/2007 7:27:57 AM PDT
by
Sue Perkick
(...what I was born to do, don't have to think it through.....)
To: CT-Freeper
In my opinion, as much as I hate to see it happen, it's better to let the guilty free than to imprison the innocent each and every time.
We are in agreement then. Ultimately, no system is perfect, but we do have some control on how the imperfections effect things.
13
posted on
04/10/2007 7:28:50 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(Eph 6:12)
To: Graybeard58
What lead them to investigate and eventually arrest this guy, I wonder? These kinds of stories always puzzle me. The guy lived 25 miles away and did not match the description. He didn’t have one person who could say he was somewhere else when the gang rape happened? This sounds like ineffective counsel if I ever heard of it unless a whole bunch of info is missing.
To: Monk Dimittis
Society has an obligation to base justice on all and best evidence available at the time. It’s not clear if that happened here or not. Ten years ago DNA was used. Why not here?
Civilized societies also have a moral duty to execute those among us who prey on innocent women and children. On this point we fail the civilized test. The methods we use to punish these kinds of criminals are barbaric, and constitute a cruel punishment on the victims and the rest of society.
15
posted on
04/10/2007 7:30:19 AM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Graybeard58
Ok this stinks- they ignore a guy who LIVES ACROSS THE STREET and arrest a guy from miles away?
When the guy across the street has a history with another suspect?
When the witness herself was not certain?
I hope he sues their asses off.
I am NOT one here who thinks the police and justice system are all fair and just... They are full of idiots, just like every government agency.
16
posted on
04/10/2007 7:31:40 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: Balding_Eagle
Civilized societies also have a moral duty to execute those among us who prey on innocent women and children. The man wrongly deemed guilty would be dead in this case as well as 26 others in Texas alone.
The number was 23 in Illinois, the last time I looked.
17
posted on
04/10/2007 7:35:19 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Mr. K
I hope he sues their asses off. States are rapidly enacting laws limiting how much can be paid in these cases. Usually a very low amount considering the long term loss of freedom involved.
18
posted on
04/10/2007 7:38:15 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: lovecraft
Do you actually think he would project a negative attitude before he is actually out of jail for good? He was just being smart. When he is actually free is time enough to wage war against the system that wrongly convicted him.
19
posted on
04/10/2007 8:04:06 AM PDT
by
conservative blonde
(Let's call the Jr. Senator from Illinois by his full name, Barack Hussein Obama)
To: conservative blonde
Do you actually think he would project a negative attitude before he is actually out of jail for good? He was just being smart. He didn't have a bad attitude, I would be pissed. The evidence released him, not his attitude. That's why I said he was a better man than me. I don't think I could have had his positive attitude.
20
posted on
04/10/2007 8:13:12 AM PDT
by
lovecraft
(Specialization is for insects.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson