Skip to comments.
STEVE FORBES JOINS GIULIANI CAMPAIGN
Race42008 ^
| 3/28/07
Posted on 03/28/2007 8:25:49 AM PDT by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340, 341-353 last
To: nopardons
That was damned rude! Yet you seem to have a ticket to ride, no matter what you say
To: dirtboy
dirtbot says: "....My gawd, does Rudy bear NO RESPONSIBILITY for the Kerik fiasco? Or should we just move on?...."
To redirect your question.....My gawd, does Duncan Hunter bear NO RESPONSIBILTY for the Duke Cunningham fiasco? Or should we just move on? Afterall, to be fair, innuendos and guilt by association should apply to everyone running for president, don't you think?
I assume by your lack of a response that you agree?
342
posted on
03/29/2007 10:34:43 AM PDT
by
Gop1040
To: Gop1040
Fred Thompson is more conservative and has less baggage and therefore is more electable.
343
posted on
03/29/2007 10:35:57 AM PDT
by
Fierce Allegiance
(There are 2 types of Rudy fans - the uninformed or anti-conservative TROLLS who do not belong on FR)
To: Gop1040
To redirect your question.....My gawd, does Duncan Hunter bear NO RESPONSIBILTY for the Duke Cunningham fiasco?Last I checked, Duke Cunningham was not a buisness partner of Hunter's, but was elected by the constituents of a separate congressional district. I also don't recall Hunter pushing Cunningham for the most important anti-terror job in the country.
I assume by your lack of a response that you agree?
I can reasonably conclude (not assume) that you're a dishonest jerk by even attempting this "lack of a response" gambit before I can even read your response and reply to it. But I've come to expect this kind of nonsense from the Rudy camp. They've shown their poor character long ago when they embraced Clintonista-style techniques like you just pulled here.
344
posted on
03/29/2007 10:38:10 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: dirtboy
"......I can reasonably conclude (not assume) that you're a dishonest jerk...."
Name calling says more about yourself than anything else. Check post #332.
345
posted on
03/29/2007 11:32:58 AM PDT
by
Gop1040
To: Gop1040
Name calling says more about yourself than anything else. Check post #332.Oh, pardon me. You replied to me several hours after I left the thread, and my ping lists pushed your response down below where I would notice it. Sorry I didn't realize yours are the most important posts to answer on FR.
346
posted on
03/29/2007 11:39:35 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: dirtboy
"Sorry I didn't realize yours are the most important posts to answer on FR."
I suspect there's an avoidance of anything that puts your candidate in a bad light. Rudy trashing seems preferable. That's OK, I can accept that for what it is.
347
posted on
03/29/2007 11:48:48 AM PDT
by
Gop1040
To: Gop1040
I suspect there's an avoidance of anything that puts your candidate in a bad light.I suggest you quit thinking that posting to someone hours after they leave a thread, and having them not respond, is indicative of anything more than the fact that they didn't see your post to them.
Rudy trashing seems preferable.
I hate to tell you this, but Rudy "trashing" (or truth-telling) is inevitable on a conservative website. Especially when his toadies spam enless Rudy nonsense on FR.
That's OK, I can accept that for what it is.
I really don't give a rat's ass what you accept it for, newb.
348
posted on
03/29/2007 11:51:37 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
To: dirtboy
"....Especially when his toadies spam enless Rudy nonsense on FR."
Why bother with the 15% Rudy toadies on FR? Seems Your candidate needs all the help he can get.
349
posted on
03/29/2007 12:00:25 PM PDT
by
Gop1040
To: youngjim
"As far as Gatun, you could have 300 lawyers in yer family and that would still mark you an imbecile for your obloquy against General Olson."
The "General" in Solicitor General or Attorney General is not a rank. It specifies that one is the general solicitor or general attorney for the country.
350
posted on
03/29/2007 7:34:51 PM PDT
by
FredHunter08
(Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
Until now, I thought Steve Forbes was one of the smart ones. That says more about you than it does about Forbes.
351
posted on
03/29/2007 7:38:29 PM PDT
by
Chunga
(Conservatives Don't Let Democrats Win Elections. They Vote Republican.)
To: areafiftyone
I thought Steve was way smarter than that. I know so many who would never vote for Rudy. Myself, I would write in Micky Mouse first. Hillary or Rudy, there will be little individual liberty and freedom left. If I voted for D or R in this hypothetical, the thugs kicking in my door to kill me and get my guns could be from the party I voted for. There is something very self-destructive in that. I truly believe that politicians who want to disarm, or restrict in any way, law abiding citizen gun rights intend to do evil and don't want opposition they can't easily squash. Rudy does not score well in the POTENTIAL FOR EVIL INDEX. Has he even read the Constitution and Bill of Rights?
To: Fierce Allegiance
Because he wants to support a good cause.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300, 301-320, 321-340, 341-353 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson