Skip to comments.
Treating gun owners like sex offenders in the name of "sunshine"
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/007050.htm ^
| 3/13/2007
| agitate
Posted on 03/13/2007 1:50:26 PM PDT by Agitate
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: Egon
How about "Because you have a license plate, or a phone number or an SSN" we publish that? I might advocate some sort of "Don't get mad get even" kind of response but Freepers are more civil than that.
To: P8riot
Oops. They didn't release the addresses of gun owners. They released their names. It's still rotten. Oh yes they did! Name and street address of record.
No they didn't.
I actually used the link they had on their site and expected a complete list, by alphabetical order. Nope
The searcher needs to enter a last name and a geographical location; the list then displays everyone in that location with that last name.
Not exactly the easiest way for criminals to find gun owners.
42
posted on
03/13/2007 7:28:16 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: Publius6961
Nevertheless it made the addresses available. You had to look for them but they were there. I found mine, and dozens of people I know, two of which were former battered women that are trying really hard to distance themselves from their abusers.
43
posted on
03/13/2007 7:58:05 PM PDT
by
P8riot
(I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
To: antiRepublicrat
The point -
What the state police did was unconstitutional under the 4th amendment. Publishing the list was unconstitutional under the 4th amendment. I would guess that is the reason they removed the list. If I had gotten to the list before it was removed I would have contacted each person and suggested they do a class action suit against the paper, writer, and the state police.
Also, I do not believe that the state police have the right to maintain a database. They also do not have the right to require Social Security Nos. The SSN must be given voluntarily per federal law.
44
posted on
03/13/2007 10:57:17 PM PDT
by
mombrown1
(The Second Amendment is the reset button for the First.)
To: mombrown1
They also do not have the right to require Social Security Nos. The SSN must be given voluntarily per federal law. There's a hitch to that. It is voluntary: if you voluntarily apply for a permit, you voluntarily give over your SSN. Nobody's forcing you to get a permit, so nobody's forcing you to give over your SSN.
Not my view, that's just how the government thinks.
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Well, this makes the third thread in three days that I have seen on this topic. The first two have been flushed down the memory-hole by the Admin Mods.
Let's see how long this one lasts.
46
posted on
03/14/2007 7:19:36 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have two speeds: "graze" and "stampede".)
To: Egon
Parents might like to know if a member of the car pool has a pistol in the glove box. Employers might like to know if employees are bringing weapons to the office. I have a CCW permit and I NEVER carry a gun in the car. This is idiotic.
47
posted on
03/14/2007 7:21:05 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Joe Brower
48
posted on
03/14/2007 7:29:10 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: patton
I imagine that is a legal issue for the paperI imagine their 'legal issues' are just beginning.
One of those who wrote in their comments section thanked the columnist (sarcastically, I presume) for exposing them to Islamic Jihad and Hamas, who now have their home address if they used the database.
Others made similar comments in re: abusive ex spouses, gang members, etc.
Someone is quite possibly in deep litigational doo-doo.
49
posted on
03/14/2007 7:35:04 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Egon
The public doesn't have the right to know everything, if it is legally permitted. What's legally perrmitted may be ethically out of bounds. This MSM reporter forgot that distinction. I could publish a list of all the journalists in this country, complete with their names and addresses. We'll see if those First Amendment purists are still for sunshine when its THEIR their privacy that is invaded.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
50
posted on
03/14/2007 7:36:59 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: AppyPappy
Good morning
I also have a permit, and I have a gun, in condition one, on me or within immediate reach at almost all times.
Almost, in that I have to pass through detectors and am prohibited from carrying in some places. I go to those places only when I have to.
Other than those in places, well, they call it Concealed Carry for a reason and the gun is in the car.
Michael Frazier
51
posted on
03/14/2007 7:45:18 AM PDT
by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: TexasBeth
School Lane was closed, a state police bomb squad was called and at least some neighbors were evacuated after Trejbal, who attracted a deluge of criticism with a column about concealed carry firearms permits, found the package during a lunch-time trip home. Trejbal has received threats in the wake of his Sunday column, which celebrated open government and public records and was accompanied by an online database listing the about 135,000 Virginians who are licensed to carry concealed firearms.Good news as far as I'm concerned.
52
posted on
03/14/2007 7:45:29 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
To: Egon
Au contraire. Because the government handles the permitting, it is everyone's business.The author is simply begging to have someone publish every scrap of public information available about him...
What's the over-under (in minutes) for a FReeper to upload a screenshot of his home from Google Earth?
53
posted on
03/14/2007 7:46:35 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
To: Joe Brower
Well, this makes the third thread in three days that I have seen on this topic. The first two have been flushed down the memory-hole by the Admin Mods. Let's see how long this one lasts.They were trashed because people were posting this dork's home address. As long as people refrain from doing so, and go the the above link to the column's comment page for his address, this thread should be fine.
54
posted on
03/14/2007 7:49:02 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
To: Teacher317
christian.trejbal@roanoke.com
381-1645
(found here)
55
posted on
03/14/2007 7:49:39 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
To: flashbunny; hellinahandcart
Excellent suggestion. I like it.
56
posted on
03/14/2007 7:52:34 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
To: brazzaville
You live in California. I live in the mountains of Va. My threat level is almost nil. Having a gun in my car would mean I would have to start locking it. My gun is more likely to be stolen than needed to defend myself.
57
posted on
03/14/2007 7:55:14 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Teacher317
WhitePages.com has...
[undisclosed] (sic) Westside Blvd NW
Roanoke, VA 24017
(just south of the Roanoke Country Club, next to Williams Memorial Park)
I wonder if he has a mortgage?
58
posted on
03/14/2007 7:55:52 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
To: patton
Good morning.
I'm betting that the package was on Christian's porch because he placed it there.
There's a long tradition of Liberals faking threatening behavior by the people they offend.
Michael Frazier
59
posted on
03/14/2007 7:56:47 AM PDT
by
brazzaville
(no surrender no retreat, well, maybe retreat's ok)
To: Teacher317
Hmmm...
this webpage has a different address for him.
(Apparently some goon has already sent a "myssterious package" to his home... I'm definitely not advocating THAT kind of stupidity... but of course, now he might understand what happens when someone's private information is published.)
60
posted on
03/14/2007 8:01:20 AM PDT
by
Teacher317
(Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson