Posted on 03/08/2007 3:57:58 AM PST by pookie18
I watched both episodes. Although the first was definitely funny in some places, it was definitely rough at the edges and could have used more polish. It didn't look like Rush and Ann had quite gotten their timing and smoothness down right, sort of like actors at a dress rehearsal who still need to do more work before they go on stage before an audience.
The second episode, OTOH, was silky smooth and rib splittingly funny, so much so that it seemed to be over before it started. Rush and Ann were great, but the actual "news" segment was even better. I especially liked the anchorette who appeared to be constantly in moderate distress, as though she was a bit constipated, hoping to relieve herself, but thus far unable to do it.
It hadn't occured to me before, but maybe that's part of the point.
I think Fox is offering the show as a counter to the that moronic Jon Stewart fake news show for unemployed dope smoking libtards living in their Mom's basements.
Lameness of is part of the genre.
I've gotten a few chuckles seeing Rush and Coulter in the openings. That was enough to justify putting it on my schedule.
I'm also glad someone is at least making an effort to provide a conservative alternative to Stewart.
I especially like the way Ann was parodying the liberal caricature of herself and conservatives in the opening segment. When Rush leaves her in charge to go on a golfing trip, she immediately phones the Pentagon and asks what countries we haven't invaded yet. "Ah, Canada," she nods approvingly after a few seconds. Priceless!
I loved it (except for the canned laughter of course), and I think if the pilots were decent, the show will be great with more funding! In any case, this is sure to aggravate the Dems who still swear John Stewart is non-partisan.
Um, I heard the first episode sucked. Was the second episode much better?
I didnt see the first one but saw the second show for a painful 10 minutes. I found it unfunny. It had a real loud annoying phony laugh track which I resented. I resented it because the laugh track was telling me that I was too stupid to know that I should be laughing.
By the way
This is what made M.A.S.H. great. It had no laugh track, and it was funny. And yes, there were also tragic moments in the episodes.
Way cool!
I didn't cath the very beginning of the
pikot they aired fist, but at the
beginning of the second pilot they
aired they panned the audience
as it was clapping, before bringing
the camera up to the stage center
shot. of the anchor desk.
There very clearly was a audience
clapping.
Me too. They were hilarious episodes!
Read Rush's last sentence of the first paragraph. "These were pilots." While I found only a few funny parts in each episode, the real shows to come may just have better production value, i.e. writing, no laughtrack, etc. I hope.
There is no laugh track. That is a live studio sudience.
It's fairly good but the woman reporter has a high, annoying voice. I like the guy though.
That was a live studio audience. It sounded "loud and annoying" because it was a live studio audience and not a homogenized phony laugh track.
At any rate I am pleased to see that Fox has picked this up. Ridicule of the left in a humor format is just the medicine this nation needs. Leftists despise laughed at. Watch the rage.
Oh..those are laugh tracks all right...and if you listen closely it's the same laugh
I didnt realize they have an audience. In these cases, the audience is told when to laugh. Notice that they all laugh on cue and unnaturally loud.
They can also add the laugh track later
What ever.
But anyway, I found the whole thing annoying. Ann and Rush were okay. The few minutes I saw after Ann and Rush disappeared were boring. But, Im glad other folks enjoyed it. I am the one who didnt
I say off with everyones heads!!! : )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.