Skip to comments.
Mexican anger over US 'trespass'
BBC News ^
| 2/24/2007
| kik5150
Posted on 02/24/2007 5:18:16 PM PST by kik5150
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Sure, 30 million Mexicans here illegaly,no problem, but step one foot on their side of the border and we have an "incident"
1
posted on
02/24/2007 5:18:18 PM PST
by
kik5150
To: kik5150
see:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;s=trespass
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1790175/posts
2
posted on
02/24/2007 5:21:49 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: kik5150
Boo-freakin'-hooo! If Mexico wasn't a perfectly good waste of soil, I'd say let's declare war on them and take their land. How dare they be upset at us when the Mexican government was giving out pamphlets on how to get into the U.S. illegally and what to do when they got here. I expect the dumb-o-cRATS to issue an apology and monetary compensation. Are we Freepers the only sane people anymore?
3
posted on
02/24/2007 5:24:45 PM PST
by
Nathan _in_Arkansas
(Shut the deuce up!!! I'll do the fighting!!!)
To: kik5150
What a joke.
BTW, didn't their Federales or whoever cross the Rio into US territory a few years back?
4
posted on
02/24/2007 5:25:14 PM PST
by
Clara Lou
(Hillary: We're going to take some things from you on behalf of the common good. ~2004)
To: kik5150
What about all of the illegal Mexicans that area thousand miles inside the border?
5
posted on
02/24/2007 5:30:52 PM PST
by
bilhosty
(to hell with ABCNNBCBS)
To: kik5150
Mexico hasn't seen anger yet.
6
posted on
02/24/2007 5:33:05 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: Clara Lou
Yes they did but then it was them so it was no big deal when they did it.
7
posted on
02/24/2007 5:33:06 PM PST
by
Shots
(Loose Lips sink ships.........)
To: kik5150
Oh, cry me a damn river. We are being overrun!
A lot of countries would put in minefields instead of a fence. Cheaper and more effective.
We are nicer than that.
8
posted on
02/24/2007 5:33:25 PM PST
by
LibKill
(ENOUGH! Take the warning labels off everything and let Saint Darwin do his job.)
To: Nathan _in_Arkansas
"Are we Freepers the only sane people anymore?" Yes.
9
posted on
02/24/2007 5:35:08 PM PST
by
realpatriot
(Some spelling errers entionally included!)
To: kik5150
has the deepest respect for the integrity of the sovereignty of.... Nice to know ONE of us does.
To: kik5150
Hey Mexico,bend over and I'll give you back your 10 yards !!!
11
posted on
02/24/2007 5:39:26 PM PST
by
Obie Wan
To: kik5150
Wow!Amazing.the Mexican government has finally discovered where their national boundary ends.Why can't they keep their citizens from breaking into our country with the knowledge they've gained we should have No more problems with Criminal aliens crossing our border.Sarcasm.
I can dream can't I.
12
posted on
02/24/2007 5:40:33 PM PST
by
puppypusher
(The world is going to the dogs.)
To: kik5150
I understand and sympathize with their position. Mexico is a sovereign state and must protect their territorial integrity from encroachments. In fact, I think this is so important that I believe Mexico should immediately build a continuous twenty foot high concrete fence from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico and patrol it with their troops to prevent any Americans from illegally crossing into Mexico.
To: kik5150
Garcia is so eloquent when he speaks of the "sovereignty of Mexican soil". Wouldn't it be a wonderful thing if the Mexicans were concerned about the "sovereignty of
American soil"?
The coming storm is being fed by the arrogance of Mexican authorities and their so-called "American" sycophants.
14
posted on
02/24/2007 5:46:48 PM PST
by
Thumper1960
(Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
To: kik5150
Oh, dear. I guess Mexico is just going to have to build a wall to prevent incursions by our military. Such a pity.
To: kik5150
In a statement, the US Ambassador to Mexico Tony Garza said: "The US is sensitive to Mexican concerns... [and] has the deepest respect for the integrity of the sovereignty of Mexican soil".
GGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.........I don't know where to go with this one...
If I said what was pulsing through my brain right now, I would get banned.
16
posted on
02/24/2007 6:02:41 PM PST
by
rottndog
(While reading this tag, remember Tens of Thousands of Americans are risking their lives for you.)
To: LibKill
thats a good idea, how many mexicans are gonna run across a minefield? and those who do try, well, tragic
17
posted on
02/24/2007 6:07:29 PM PST
by
dudewheresmytank
(life is good and ammunation is cheap, use both freely)
To: kik5150
Metres/meters and yards are not equivalent.
Guess the writer doesn't care, like Mexico doesn't care about encouraging their citizens to take their lives in their hands by breaking US laws!! >:-(
18
posted on
02/24/2007 6:09:54 PM PST
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX (Bible Thumper and Proud!))
To: kik5150
That's kind of what I was thinking-
Workers "theoretically" cross 10 yards into Mexican territory (which I seriously doubt, considering that the "fence" is primarily planned to be entirely on US soil), yet Mexicans of all varieties (illegal immigrants, drug runners, human smugglers, and even military units have and do cross into US territory on a very regular basis unmolested.
19
posted on
02/24/2007 6:11:53 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: Obie Wan
20
posted on
02/24/2007 6:19:21 PM PST
by
D Rider
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson