Posted on 02/13/2007 5:28:13 AM PST by Nicholas Conradin
There is a kernel of truth in his comments about historical leftist foreign policy weaknesses* (equivalent to pointing out that a woman who carries a gun and is willing to use it is unlikely to be raped no matter what she wears).
That said, his cultural arguments are simply blame-America drivel, no more worthy of respect than those of Noam Chomsky.
*In fairness, conservatives have sometimes been guilty as well -- e.g. Reagan's retreat after the Marine barracks bombing -- and an intellecutally honest commentator would have noted that fact.
The proper military and political strategies to counter the threat aren't the issues on which VDH is taking issue with D'Sousa. The argument is over D'Sousa's rather facile and self-serving* attack on American culture.
The former is, of course, the more important issue generally, but it isn't the one that happens to be the focus of VDH's essay.
*Odd, isn't it, that you didn't see Michael Moore asserting that Muslims were offended by Hollywood decadence, or Pat Robertson suggesting that they were ticked off by Christian evangelism efforts? By an amazing coincidence, they and others figured out that it was the fault of a faction of Americans they already didn't like. They must have been psychic or something....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.