Why Hillary's Iowa Misstep Can Sink Her:Missus Clinton's Saturday Night Live Problem(Part 2 @ 156)

hillary clinton, FoxNews, Washington Post | 01.29.07 | Mia T

[PGalt]

Upon further review...

At the end of Carl Cameron's report Hillary's explanation/complaint was (according to Carl), "Now she's getting psychoanalyzed."

300+ million potential reporters in The United States of America and there is only ONE REPORTER analyzing this psycho.

You are the living embodiment of The First Amendment to the Constitution.

Thanks for your focus.

Watch your back.

[Mia T]

;)

[colorado tanker]

Frankly, I thought it was kinda funny. Not a blunder at all.

If anything sinks her it will be her Bill baggage and persistent high negatives.

Don't underestimate Hillary - people thought she couldn't take upstate New York away from Guiliani, but she was doing just that when he quit the race.

[Mia T]

thank you, PGalt. :)

"What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."

James Madison

 

When the founders granted 'The Press' special dispensation, they never considered the possibility that traitors in our midst would game the system. But that is precisely what is happening today. (Hate America? Support jihad? Become a 'journalist!')

This was bound to happen.

The premise behind the First Amendment as it applies to the press--that a vigilant watchdog is necessary, sufficient--indeed, possible--to protect against man's basest instincts--is tautologically flawed: The fox guarding the White House, if you will.

Walter Lippmann, the 20th-century American columnist, wrote, "A free press is not a privilege, but an organic necessity in a great society." True in theory. True even in Lippmann's quaint mid-20th-century America, perhaps. But patently false in this postmodern era of the bubbas and the Pinches.

When a free and great society is hijacked by a seditious bunch of dysfunctional, power-hungry malcontents and elitists, it will remain neither free nor great for long. When hijacked by them in the midst of asymmetric warfare, it will soon not remain at all.

If President George W. Bush is serious about winning the War on Terror, he will aggressively pursue the enemy in our midst.

Targeting and defeating the enemy in our midst is, by far, the more difficult task and will measure Bush's resolve and courage (and his independence from the MPRDC (mutual protection racket in DC)) more than any pretty speech, more even than 'staying the course.'

 

"It is hard to believe that a man is telling the truth when you know that you would lie if you were in his place."

H. L. Mencken
 

IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)
by Mia T, 6.27.06

READ MORE

WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES


WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)


'MISBEGOTTEN' TIMES
(NARROWNESS, MR. SULZBERGER, NOT WIDTH)


PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON
WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES


The Devil & the Gray Lady


 

[Mia T]

Joke or blunder, it's a problem for clinton either way.

That it was 'kinda funny,' that it was perceived by many as a joke, may, in fact, be the bigger problem for the wannabe commander in chief.

Take a look at the second installment of this analysis

A seemingly disproportionate tumult of confusion and disbelief surrounds missus clinton's "evil and bad men" remark. The press, pundits, plain folk--even missus clinton herself--can't seem to decide how to play it-- joke or misstep--not realizing that either option is very bad news for the quondam shoo-in. (read more)
EVIL AND BAD MEN' A LOSE-LOSE FOR HILLARY!
(MISSUS CLINTON'S 'SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE' PROBLEM-PART 2)

As for Giuliani and upstate NY, I'm not sure what your point is. Giuliani was diagnosed with prostate cancer and didn't run.... He would have crushed her.

Missus clinton won because she ran for reelection against an unfunded* third-stringer with zero name recognition; that is to say, she ran virtually unopposed. And even then, she had to dump 30 mil into the race....

A HILLARY 'LANDSLIDE'??? NOT SO FAST, MISSUS CLINTON....

[colorado tanker]

My recollection of the polls is that Guiliani and Clinton were very close, but Guiliani was under-performing upstate, which is where most of the Republican votes are. Hillary is very dangerous when she puts on her "moderate" disguise. Frankly, I think she would have beaten Rudy, which is another reason he bailed.

She does have another negative I didn't mention, which might keep her from the Dem nomination - initial support for the Iraq war. She still hasn't joined with the moonbats calling for immediate withdrawal. She can't because it's part of her "moderate" shtick. But it drives the moonbat base nuts, especially in a caucus state like Iowa because that's who comes out for them.

[Mia T]

You make good points. I don't suggest for a minute that the clinton machine isn't dangerous. I wouldn't be doing this if that is what I thought.

What I am saying is that missus clinton is defective, a dud.

Yes, I do recall the closeness of those polls. But as I recall, Rudy hadn't yet engaged.

I don't think he bailed. He was facing a cancer that killed his father, for goodness sake.

That said, I never thought he needed to run that race. In many ways, it was a step down... and he had already demonstrated presidential timbre.

I will be posting something shortly about why this defective character is allowed to remain on the national stage. She and her husband should have been taken out a decade ago.

[colorado tanker]

The thought of a third Clinton term makes me ill. I don't know if Obama or Edwards have the heft to defeat her despite her problems with the moonbat base.

I think the only pubbies who could defeat her are Rudy, McCain and possibly Romney. Each has his problems, however, with parts of our base.

[word_warrior_bob]

There is no stopping this creature, not as long as the media goes on an all out non stop media blitz right through 2008, and they will.

If enough dingbat single women register to vote and vote for her, she will be UNBEATABLE for President.

[Mia T]

If enough dingbat single women register to vote and vote for her, she will be UNBEATABLE for President.

When women learn about this--and we must make sure they do--they will be rejecting her en masse:

 

The two elephants in the room are the clintons' ¹ rape of Juanita Broaddrick ² and their terrorism failure ³.

It doesn't require more than half a brain and 10% of the data to understand why this self-absorbed, noxious, vacant pair must not be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office ever again.

[word_warrior_bob]

Mia, if you were the anchor of a network news program, Hillary would be lucky to get 10% of the vote!

The thought of her becoming president REPULSES me, but we have slipped a LONG way as a nation and the propaganda laden media will be conducting an all out blitz for Hillary that would make the Pravda blush.

We need an organized "Swiftboating" with millions in cash to stop this harrion.

[Mia T]

thank you, word_warrior_bob, ;)

It will have to be us. The DC mutual protection racket writ large won't do it. Shame on them. The clintons should have been nailed at least a decade ago.

[jla]

RE: Post #140

Cú Chulainn

Fionn MacCumhail

Brian Boru (wore a crown a/c of being High King of Ireland)

[Mia T]

A counterexample, altho, in all fairness, not sure if he's actually Irish. (He's a mercenary.)

galloglass soldier

[jla]

He's more than likely a Scot.

Forty-four days 'til spring

[Mia T]

Part Two:

'EVIL AND BAD MEN' A LOSE-LOSE FOR HILLARY!
MISSUS CLINTON'S 'SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE' PROBLEM
PART 2

PART 1

by Mia T, 1.31.07

 

seemingly disproportionate tumult of confusion and disbelief surrounds missus clinton's "evil and bad men" remark. The press, pundits, plain folk--even missus clinton herself--can't seem to decide how to play it-- joke or misstep--not realizing that either option is very bad news for the quondam shoo-in.

 

OPTION ONE-joke:

Missus clinton managed, with one not very smart quip, to turn a serious question about the decisive issue of her candidacy, whether she is qualified to be a wartime commander in chief, into a joke.

Even worse, in order to play the victim card... yet again, (HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes )... clinton invoked the evilness and pathological dysfunction of her notorious 'partnership,' equating her better half with bin Laden--will Osama sue?

Any votes missus clinton may pick up by this maneuver surely will be offset by the increasing number of those for whom the transparent tactic only reinforces their perception of clinton as a reckless opportunist who is either feckless (I could hardly breathe....) or ruthlessly complicit.(HILLARY CLINTON THREATENED JUANITA BROADDRICK 2 WEEKS AFTER BILL CLINTON RAPED HER (VIDEO))

'Joke' is the option favored by Ann Kornblut of the Washington Post and Adam Nagourney of The New York Times... and the option finally settled on by the budding comic herself. All three have concluded--wrongly--that this option salvages her commander-in-chief credibility, a construct impervious to ratiocination in any case, being a clinton machine fabrication from the getgo.

OPTION TWO-misstep:

Missus clinton is so lacking in mental agility and awareness that she cannot see five words and one premise ahead of her.

I argue in Part 1 that this is the factually true option. It is provably true by a frame-by-frame analysis of the video, and is supported by missus clinton's post-event excited utterance.

Either way, would you want this person running the War on Terror? I don't think so.

(Of course, there are numerous other reasons you wouldn't want missus clinton (and the husband) to be the people responsible for--to borrow a phrase from the wife--'decking' the terrorists.) (THE CLINTONS 'DECK' WOMEN AND OBAMA. TOO BAD THEY DIDN'T 'DECK' OSAMA.)

But it gets worse for missus clinton. Faced with this lose-lose scenario, what did 'the smartest woman in the world' do?

True to her congenitally 'middling,' greedy, undiscriminating form, she chose both options, of course.

 

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[Mia T]

pretty

[jla]

We'll see if the ones I planted escaped the clutches of my furry friends outside.

[jla]

Google indeed.