Skip to comments.
Republicans 2008: Giuliani 32%, McCain 26% (Angus-Reid's latest)
angus-reid.com ^
| 1/27/2007
| Staff
Posted on 01/27/2007 6:53:52 AM PST by Dark Skies
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-191 next last
To: areafiftyone
2
posted on
01/27/2007 6:54:29 AM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: Dark Skies
The Bash-bots must have slept in this morning.
3
posted on
01/27/2007 6:58:28 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Show me a 'true' Conservative and I'll show you someone with bad knees)
To: Dark Skies
It'll BE Dark Skies if a liberal northeast-corridor, abortion-supporting, gun-grabbing RINO gets into the White House.
Just say NO to any and all RINOs.
4
posted on
01/27/2007 6:58:59 AM PST
by
DocH
(Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
To: Dark Skies
If its not Rasmussen, you're wasting my time.
To: Dark Skies
Last night on Hannity and Google, Dennis Miller did his weekly gig and declared his preference for a McCain/Giuliani ticket...
6
posted on
01/27/2007 7:00:03 AM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(recent nightmare: Googled up "Helen Thomas nude"....)
To: Dark Skies
What would Duncan Hines say?
7
posted on
01/27/2007 7:00:04 AM PST
by
zarf
To: Dark Skies
If I change my name to No Opinion and announce my candidacy, would I qualify for matching funds?
8
posted on
01/27/2007 7:00:10 AM PST
by
edpc
(The pen is mightier than the sword......until you fight someone.)
To: Dark Skies
Please raise your hand if you trust anything from CNN.... anybody?
The MSM will do everything in their power to ensure that a RINO wins the GOP nomination. They have done a pretty good job of telling Republicans what they have to do do if they wish to win. Far too many on this board are enojoying their kool-aid. If we have to surrender in order to win, what do we win?
To: chopperman
If its not Rasmussen, you're wasting my time.lol...you're wasting your own time. This article was clearly marked as Angus-Reid but you took the time to drop in and make a post.
10
posted on
01/27/2007 7:02:39 AM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
The Bash-bots must have slept in this morning. No, but apparently, the true Conservatives were still sleeping, or working, when the left-wing media, DEM/RINO-loving, push-pollers called and ONLY talked to liberal DOLTS to get the poll outcomes they wanted.
11
posted on
01/27/2007 7:03:04 AM PST
by
DocH
(Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
To: Dark Skies
We here ya go then, so you're not disapointed- (although you are the first "bash bot" to post, bashing bash bots.)
Shouldn't McCain be on the Democrat List?
To: zarf
What would Duncan Hines say?Well aren't you cute?
At least Duncan Hunter is a conservative and not crazy like McCain or a womanizer like Gulliani.
13
posted on
01/27/2007 7:04:52 AM PST
by
CAluvdubya
(What's so hard to understand about the word illegal?)
To: ErnBatavia
Supporting VIRTUAL demonRAT RINOs like mccain and giuliani?
That shows, as far as Miller has come in breaking free from his liberal chains, he ain't where he needs to be yet.
14
posted on
01/27/2007 7:06:00 AM PST
by
DocH
(Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
To: Nathan Zachary
15
posted on
01/27/2007 7:06:52 AM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: Dark Skies
If Rudi thinks NARAL is going to get him the nomination he's delusional.
16
posted on
01/27/2007 7:07:08 AM PST
by
DManA
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Does the articulateness (or lack thereof) of the bash bots remind you a little of this guy...
17
posted on
01/27/2007 7:08:43 AM PST
by
Dark Skies
("He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that" ... John Stuart Mill)
To: Dark Skies
Another USELESS and utterly MEANINGLESS poll.
Telephone interviews with 365 Republican American adults, conducted from Jan. 19 to Jan. 21, 2007. Margin of error is 5 per cent.
- 'Adults'. Sheesh, not even 'likely voters'
- A poll of 365 people with a MOE of 5%? Gee a whole 365 people, wow. What, was their cell phone minutes used up?
- So Rudy could be behind at 27% and McInsane leading with 31%
- Or... the HL could read: 68% of those polled reject Rudy.
This poll is useless, USELESS, and ...
USELESS.
18
posted on
01/27/2007 7:09:20 AM PST
by
Condor51
(The demoncRATs don't want another 'Vietnam' - they want another Dien Bien Phu.)
To: DManA
If Rudi thinks NARAL is going to get him the nomination he's delusional JUST as delusional as those on FR that think TRUE Conservatives, enough Southerners, enough Christians, enough gun owners/2nd Amendment supporters, etc. are going to actually VOTE for a scumbag RINO for President.
19
posted on
01/27/2007 7:10:29 AM PST
by
DocH
(Gun-grabbers, you can HAVE my guns... lead first.)
To: Dark Skies
"But, in fact, this was a good week for conservatives; it was the week conservatives finally fought back and began reclaiming their party."
If you read the whole article, it seems to me a RINO want have a chance at the GOP bid for president.
If the conservatives with hold their money from the NRSC and the GOP, as many are saying they will do, we will be wondering in the desert for the next forty years.
20
posted on
01/27/2007 7:12:19 AM PST
by
buck61
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-191 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson