Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shawn Hornbeck's family looks to step out of spotlight
belleville.com ^ | 1/24/07

Posted on 01/24/2007 8:24:19 AM PST by Halls

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-355 next last
To: ishabibble

So your point is that Hornbeck was forced to aid in the abduction of Ownby. And?


41 posted on 01/24/2007 8:58:31 AM PST by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: soccermom
Yes, exclusively on Oprah for NO MONEY! Sheesh!

Then why put your kid who has been abducted for 4 years and has gone thru only God knows what on an exploitive talk show so soon after he was returned to you? Fame? $$$? Stupidity, or all three?

42 posted on 01/24/2007 8:58:59 AM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: SpringheelJack

Consider how much media there is in the US, the world. I imagine, despite their efforts to address everyone once and for all, their phone, etc., is being hit nonstop with requests.

They are asking the media to stop. What else can they do? They tried to get it over with, but no one will leave them alone.


44 posted on 01/24/2007 9:00:13 AM PST by ican'tbelieveit (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team# 36120), KW:Folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Halls

What, after Oprah bought them all those new teeth? Well, they should have kept a lower profile in the first place. The world didn't need to see what pain the kid was going through, especially now that it has come out that Shawn helped kidnap the other boy.

This court case is going to be painful for everyone. It's too bad for the boys that it has to be in a court room at all.


45 posted on 01/24/2007 9:00:22 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halls

thanks, did not know that


46 posted on 01/24/2007 9:01:14 AM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BurtSB

Your accusations are unfounded rumors.


47 posted on 01/24/2007 9:01:21 AM PST by BonneBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Halls
Them putting their son on Oprah is nothing compared to the hell that child has gone through int he last 4 years.

And they sure was respecting that hell by putting him on oprah, for a ghoulish piece.

48 posted on 01/24/2007 9:01:45 AM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Their situation and desire to find their son put them in the public arena. Now, the media won't leave them alone. What are they supposed to do?

You criticize them for addressing all of the lookers and questioners. When that is done, they are still being pestered. So they come out again and ask for privacy and you criticize them.


49 posted on 01/24/2007 9:02:03 AM PST by ican'tbelieveit (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team# 36120), KW:Folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

nevermind that we don't deserve alll the facts and the DA and Sheriff knows all the facts and have stated in fact that Shawn was a victim and that we need to educate ourselves!

I chose to believe them rather than come to my own conclusions. I chose to think about it and educate myself and not to point the finger at Shawn. The DA knows the facts, and we don't! I choose to trust them in this!

Maybe you need to educate yourself and get smart about this instead of drawing your own conclusions!


50 posted on 01/24/2007 9:02:14 AM PST by Halls (Please take time out to look at pictures of missing children and help get them home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas

And telling the world that Shawn was sexually molested even though they are just going by "statistics".....Oprah shouldn't have asked and the Akers should have told her "no comment". Evidently, before agreeing to interviews, the Akers had a list of topics that were off limits to ask. If, during the interview, these things were asked, something like $100,000 had to be donated to the foundation. Wether Shawn was sexually abused should have topped that list!

Personally, I found the whole media tour distasteful. But as one "expert" said....who can say no to OPRAH?? gag


51 posted on 01/24/2007 9:02:25 AM PST by Jrabbit ('scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

Well, heres the actual headline:

Police: Shawn Hornbeck forced to help in Ownby kidnapping


52 posted on 01/24/2007 9:02:39 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
Please see post #31 in this thread. It is my reply to Halls. In no way am I denigrating what happened to Shawn Hornbeck, or the people here who have stood up for him.
If you look back into the threads from the day after Shawn and Ben were recovered, you will see that the only thing I posted was to the effect that I know parents of missing boys who were murdered. I believe I called them "walking ghosts" and stated that I was very happy for both families.

Personal attacks here are not going to change anything about the facts in this case. Since Shawn is identified as being an accomplice to the kidnapping of Ben, I would like know more about this aspect. That is all I am saying.
53 posted on 01/24/2007 9:03:20 AM PST by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Types_with_Fist

NOPE, your the liar, the family never appeared on FOX as you just said they did!

get the facts you idiot!


54 posted on 01/24/2007 9:03:28 AM PST by Halls (Please take time out to look at pictures of missing children and help get them home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Look, they've explained this countless times. They chose to go with Oprah Winfery because they wanted to reach the widest audience to address the questions, help other missing kids and then be done with it. Other outlets offered the Akers big bucks to go exclusively with them. Instead, they chose to take NO money, because they felt it was more important to get the message out and then withdraw. If the Akers had chosen to refuse all interviews, the jackals who are already willing to think the worst of Shawn would say that their silence was validation. I don't know for sure, but I assume the other reason they went with Oprah is because she, as the victim of molestation, can empathize.


55 posted on 01/24/2007 9:03:35 AM PST by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

Person's who become fascinated, some would say fixated, on a media event such as this abduction story have either a screw loose or no life whatsoever. Possibly both.

It's one thing to say, "wow, that's an incredible story." It's a whole other bag of tricks to become emotionally invested in the story to the point that the person is getting angry at web posters who disagree with them.

I'm sure, but want to leave no room for doubt that you understand, I'm not speaking of you with these remarks.


56 posted on 01/24/2007 9:04:20 AM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Life is tough. It's even tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Eva

there was no new teeth! Craig Aker's missing teeth were still missing in the Oprah interview.


57 posted on 01/24/2007 9:04:46 AM PST by Halls (Please take time out to look at pictures of missing children and help get them home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

IIRC, she didn't "pay" for the interview. But, she did donate $100,000 to the foundation.


58 posted on 01/24/2007 9:05:23 AM PST by Jrabbit ('scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Someone should gently inform you that this bashing and second-guessing of Shawn and his parents does him FAR more damage than any appearance on Oprah. I can in fact see that there could be some healing in that process of doing interviews and the support they get from others, but there's no redeeming value in your criticism of the choices they are making. It is obvious they love their child. It is also obvious that there are many sicko individuals who will bash the victim and his family no matter what.
59 posted on 01/24/2007 9:05:33 AM PST by TruthSetsUFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

actually, it was Shawn's decision to go on Oprah. They let him make that decision after Oprah asked them to come on the show. he decided he just wanted the get the media stuff over with, otherwise they would be hounding him till he talked and he didn't want that.


60 posted on 01/24/2007 9:06:14 AM PST by Halls (Please take time out to look at pictures of missing children and help get them home!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson