Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DAs Call for Prosecutor in Duke Lacrosse Case to Step Down
ABC News ^ | December 30, 2006 | LARA SETRAKIAN

Posted on 12/29/2006 10:07:41 PM PST by rawhide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-369 next last
To: Tom D.

Let's see:

1. I doubt this case lasts through next week. This is too big a problem for NC now.

2. Mangum was never going to testify. She did not really start this. She merely cried rape to get out of a tight spot. The Duke leftist and Nifong started this.

3. Nifong is so egotistical that will want to appear to drop this himself and not have the judge or whomever gets it next to drop the case. Of course he is also very stuborn. It will be interesting to see how these competing aspects of Nifong, ego v. stubornness, play out this coming week.

4. I have read that the NC AG is a Dim who might want to run for Senate or Governor. So I doubt he allows this case to be kicked up to him as it would be a lose lose situation for him.

5. I wonder if even Dims can publically hire Nifong after this?


121 posted on 12/30/2006 1:00:35 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: JLS
from the above article:

Hiding behind paper hung over the windows of his office

If I say the word I am thinking, I will be banned...
Hint: starts with "P" and ends with "y"

122 posted on 12/30/2006 1:02:17 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

You have the right word to decribe him.


123 posted on 12/30/2006 1:05:34 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I'll buy one vowel and a double "s"

:-)


124 posted on 12/30/2006 1:08:37 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: rawhide
Nifong withheld Brady material, too. And to my mind that's an even bigger deal than the rest of it. Funny no-one seems to want to address that....
125 posted on 12/30/2006 1:10:49 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Brady material?
Being a legal idiot, I have no clue what that would be.


126 posted on 12/30/2006 1:13:09 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
BTW, did you see in the Time article:

In the opinion of Nifong's critics, however, without him at the helm of the prosecution, there is no legitimate case to be made.

No main stream mediot, we think there is no legitimate case. That is there is no legitimate case with or without Nifong at the helm.

Also did you see that confused quotation of unnamed Durham Attorney? I guess what the quote should have been is that the attorney would bet a large amount of money that Nifong will lose his license over this and that Nifong might drop all the charges before he quits the case or his office? That is the unnamed attorney maybe thinks the ego side of Nifong, the I want to seem to be in control side will win out over the stuborn side and he may well drop the charges before resigning.
127 posted on 12/30/2006 1:15:08 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Who is "we"?


128 posted on 12/30/2006 1:15:31 PM PST by sodpoodle (if you can't handle the truth, try satire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Try "pusillanimous". It means the same, won't get you banned, and you'll sound, like, educated, and stuff. And, yes, the reason I have the dictionary link is because I couldn't spell it. Although I think it describes Brodhead more than Nifong. For Nifong, I'm thinking of a few things for which I don't have a nice word either.
129 posted on 12/30/2006 1:16:24 PM PST by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights; mewzilla

I believe Brady is a case, so Brady material is exculpatory material that must be handed over according to federal case law. That is the exculpatory DNA evidence. Correct me if I am wrong mewzilla, I am not an attorney either.


130 posted on 12/30/2006 1:17:23 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

"We" are the people who have regularly been on these threads since May or June. As I said the information you are wondering about is in the record.


131 posted on 12/30/2006 1:18:45 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

Not so fast freepers - we haven't heard from the black panthers on this issue -- it ain't over till farrakhan says its over -- what a farce!!!!!


132 posted on 12/30/2006 1:19:04 PM PST by jayadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: JLS

I don't actually work here.

Sorry to have interrupted your official bookkeeping.


133 posted on 12/30/2006 1:24:08 PM PST by sodpoodle (if you can't handle the truth, try satire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

"Nifong withheld Brady material, too. And to my mind that's an even bigger deal than the rest of it. Funny no-one seems to want to address that...."

Today's Time article says the NC bar will address that issue at its next meeting.

Judge Smith has to be majorly p.o.'d at Nifong for lying under oath, right to the judge's face, about there being no more DNA evidence. And then, Nifong tried to back that up with another lie at the next hearing. I think, by his own actions, Nifong assumed a pugilistic stance against Smith. I expect Smith to deliver the knock-out punch prior to the February court date. POW. Right in the kisser.


134 posted on 12/30/2006 1:27:05 PM PST by JoanOfArk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: JoanOfArk

Wonder if the Nifong Express to Hell will take anyone else down.

I would imagine this has become a containment issue for more than a few corrupt souls in Durham. How to cut Mikey loose before he takes the ship down.

Who will be the sacrifical lamb?

If I was a parent of one of these boys and I had the financial resources (and yes, connections) I would not rest until every maggot in Durham paid for what they did to my son.


135 posted on 12/30/2006 1:37:20 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

"Where were all these "concerned" DAs during the past 9 months?"

I think they had done all they could do without leaving themselves open for ethics complaints. They were probably begging the NC bar to hurry up and take action. Now that the bar has done so, they no longer feel the need to keep their mouths shut.


136 posted on 12/30/2006 1:49:48 PM PST by JoanOfArk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

Full compliance with constitutionally required discovery under Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, must include a method of identifying and accessing possible Brady material in the possession of law enforcement. Therefore, in conjunction with SD 02-08, which sets forth office policy for handling Brady material known within the Office of the District Attorney, this policy addresses possible Brady material which may be in the possession of law enforcement. This policy fulfills prosecutorial obligations while protecting the statutory and privacy rights of police officers.


137 posted on 12/30/2006 1:49:57 PM PST by sodpoodle (if you can't handle the truth, try satire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
If I was a parent of one of these boys and I had the financial resources (and yes, connections) I would not rest until every maggot in Durham paid for what they did to my son.

My educated guess is that it's going to be very ugly for Duke and Durham and few will be too sympathetic.

Imagine if your son didn't have the resources? Nifong is one scary character.

138 posted on 12/30/2006 1:52:55 PM PST by Neverforget01 (Kerry supports the troops by insulting them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks as usual for the ping--You're the best!


139 posted on 12/30/2006 1:54:18 PM PST by Neverforget01 (Kerry supports the troops by insulting them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JLS; Protect the Bill of Rights; mewzilla
I'm no attorney, either :) I'm just picking this up as I go along. It's from ...

Brady v. Maryland.

And it deals with exculpatory evidence.

140 posted on 12/30/2006 1:57:13 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 361-369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson