Posted on 11/23/2006 6:36:57 PM PST by no dems
Somebody else noticed, huh, Reagan Embarrassment.
Free Republic... Still Conservative after all.
Get real I don't like anything about Hillary. She belongs in jail for all her crimes or worse. I would vote to hang both Hillary and Bill Clinton for being traitors to America if it was up to me.
I never posted a single word about Hillary care so not sure why you are posting to me about it.
So far, the only candidate I like is Newt.......and remember we're not voting for saints - just a political conservative leader....if Newt was my pastor, he would have been gone a long time ago . This is politics.
I like Gingrich, but too many do not want to give him a chance. I guess the leftist in the media have successfully some how convinced the public?
He divorced his first wife. So he was an guilty of Adultery as well.
How could you possibly know that?
As far as I know she could have forced him to divorce her so that he would not be there to watch her wither away and die. I believe that is far more likely than anything else.
Why don't you get a life. The point of forums such as this is to exchange information, not for you to assign people homework. One way for Newt not to win a nomination is for those who zealously advocate his cause to have no ability to explain his positions to those who inquire about them. You are not helping him by your attitude and behavior. I don't see that even now you are able to point out what exactly it is that he would advocate on the crucial issue on energy independence other than supporting the bill of the Congressman from Iowa on offshore drilling.
LOL That is exactly what I'm doing, and its exactly what you're not doing. My posts at #308 and #309 show Newt`s energy plan as outlined on his website. The first time to my knowledge its been posted on Free Republic. Clearly you're not satisfied with what Newt has to offer. Fine. I can't read your mind. If you require additional details not contained in Newt's overview, do the research that gets you what you want. That may mean buying Newt's book, as was suggested to you earlier on this thread. You might even send Newt an Email and ask him specific questions. Newt has offered far more on the energy issue then anyone else, who might be a possible candidate for 2008.
Newt is beginning to kick off what he calls a grass roots campaign to move the GOP back to a more conservative policy driven agenda. From what I've seen so far, Newt's on the right track.
>>>>One way for Newt not to win a nomination is for those who zealously advocate his cause to have no ability to explain his positions to those who inquire about them.
That is one stupid post. First off, Newt hasn't made his intentions known concerning 2008. Advocating Newt's conservative policy agenda doesn't make one a zealot. At Newt.org, the former Speaker makes his policy positions quite clear. You've offered nothing substantive to this debate that I can find. Except to say, Newt has nothing to offer. That is simpy not true.
If the outline of your energy proposal for America's future is so much different then Newt's, lets see it.
Will his campaign consist of people such as you calling anyone who does not agree with what he says mischaractering what people say or ask and insulting anyone who requests information? Should be a huge success. Your posting name is quite inappropriate. Have you considered calling yourself Kerryman?
>>>>Your posting name is quite inappropriate.
Thank you! When people resort to such juvenile nonsense, I know I've won the debate. I think my screenname is quite appropriate. Ronald Reagan always enjoyed drawing out liberals and malcontents and revealing them for the losers they really are. Its been fun. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.