Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sleeping giant (5th excerpt from Mark Steyn's 'America Alone')
National Post - Canada ^ | Saturday, November 18, 2006 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 11/18/2006 6:54:55 AM PST by GMMAC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: GMMAC

Mark Steyn Mailing List BTTT

Cheers,

knewshound

http://www.knewshound.blogspot.com/


41 posted on 11/19/2006 9:48:41 PM PST by knews_hound (Sarcastically blogging since 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trek
To see this imagine a scenario where we have hundreds of thousands dead in our cities from WMD attacks and the world's oil supplies have been taken over by islamic radicals who boast of bringing us to our knees. Under these conditions the American people will be willing to commit to total war.

Well, this is what I was thinking. I wish there were a way to do it short of this, as it would save us a lot of blood and heartache. I'm just an amateur historian and strategist and so make no claims as to any special insight or knowledge, but it seems to me that an effective strategy to defeat one's enemies decisively w/o the subsequent horror of total war would be a desirable goal. Trouble is, when we've tried "limited war", we seem to have "limited outcome", and, in the end, this might cost more.

And unlike WWII where we had to slug it out for years to achieve the objective of destroying the enemy's will to fight, with today's weapons we can destroy completely our enemy's will to fight in a matter of hours.

If preservation of Middle East petroleum resources are a goal, one would have to be concerned with collateral damage. Even a few moderate-yield nukes in places like Tehran and Qum and Mecca might have serious collateral effects. Plus, we'd have to be concerned with escalation from third parties. I'm not sure China or Russia would not use such a conflict as an excuse to hit us when we're occupied with another opponent.

42 posted on 11/20/2006 6:05:56 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: chimera
"I'm not sure China or Russia would not use such a conflict as an excuse to hit us when we're occupied with another opponent."

China and Russia are the wild cards. It is not clear at this time how they would react to the scenario I described. But we can be assured that they will pursue their own self interests not ours. But that does not mean that they will necessarily side with the jihadists.

43 posted on 11/20/2006 6:19:19 AM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin

Thanks!


44 posted on 11/20/2006 6:30:39 AM PST by Convert from ECUSA (Regarding islam: Osculate meas Sanctas Romanas Ecclesiae nates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

bumb for later read


45 posted on 11/20/2006 10:27:28 PM PST by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

bump for later read


46 posted on 11/20/2006 10:27:57 PM PST by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson