Posted on 11/16/2006 2:26:17 PM PST by blam
Ernest, did you get slapped?
My job for the National Ocean Service was actually fun last night when I saw all those water levels start jumping about on our Tides Online website.
Probably got b!tch-slapped!
Crescent City harbor suffers up to $700K in damages from tsunami (California)
Why did Crescent City get higher waves than Japan did?
I checked out the times on this happening and it appears that this incident happened 12 hours after the earthquake. Does anyone know if this makes this sounds plausible? Twelve hours after the earthquake seems like an awful long time before a tsunami hits.
Isn't this the same town that evacuated during a tsunami alert last year?
I live on my boat in Alaska and the storm winds have been constant for a week. I wouldn't have noticed a "surge" amidst the rest of the "slapping around" I've been getting.
We got 'slapped' around a bit here on the Gulf Coast yesterday too. Some people further east were killed from the same storm.
Tsunamis are beamed out perpendicular to the fault that ruptures, generally. The fault runs SW to NE. Japan is SW of the end of fault, and thus missed the highest part of the tsunami.
Crescent City, however, was right in the middle of the eastern "beam" of the Tsunami.
Also, the ocean bottom near Crescent City focuses and amplifies Tsunami waves, which is why they're always hit much, much harder than anywhere else on the US West Coast.
That's the actual travel time for a tsunami from the Kuril Islands to California. It's a long way.
I agree it's a long way but it hit Hawaii 6 hours after the earthquake.
I'd have to look at the precise time of the impact which isn't in this article - it may have been less than 12 hours....
There's nothing about the Crescent City story that seems fishy at all though really.
Not sure,...lets ping tubebender and ask him...he lives up that way.
Tubebender .... please see post #9 for a question.
" The Tsunami of 1700 left several inches of sediment in the harbor. That was from a great quake on the Cascadia Fault that ruptures every 300 years or so..."
The 1700 quake/tsunami was confirmed by tsunami records kept in Japan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.