Announcing a New Book by Alamo-Girl and betty boop [Update at #329]

Alamo-Girl and betty boop | November 13, 2006 | betty boop

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for your reply, GOPJ!

[bmwcyle]

Always for you.

[Alamo-Girl]

In short, A-G and I both firmly believe that there is no conflict or contradiction between the Holy Scriptures and legitimate state-of-the-art science.

Indeed! The operative word is "legitimate." LOL!

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you for your reply, RightWhale!

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you, Cicero!

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you for bumping by!

[Alamo-Girl]

{{{Hugs}}}

[betty boop]

Thank you so very much!

[.30Carbine]

Thank you so much for that insight into how Lulu works. How grateful I am seeing Christ move in this particular way! How very Good our God, how grand and great, how compassionate to all mankind.

[.30Carbine]

Just ordered 3 copies (finally had the time to do so) and I am soooo excited to receive them, to eat up the one I'm keepin' and give 2 away! Thank you, dear ladies, for your contributions to mankind in this day, through faith and reason, friendship, dialog, and apologetic, science and the love of the Creator of all that is. How mighty are the Works of God!

[betty boop]

May God ever bless you, dear sister in Christ! Thank you so much for your kind words and support of our newly-fledged book!

[Alamo-Girl]

Amen! Praise God!

[Alamo-Girl]

Oh wow! Thank you so very much for your encouragements and support, dear sister in Christ!

[Lexinom]

Thank you for this work. People are hungry for the meaning and purpose, for a reaffirmation of a worldview that provides a rational basis for the very axioms on which science rests.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so very much for your encouragements!

[betty boop]

Thank you for your very kind words, Lexinom!

[.30Carbine]

People are hungry for the meaning and purpose, for a reaffirmation of a worldview that provides a rational basis for the very axioms on which science rests.

How very well you have chosen the wording of that sentence.

[.30Carbine]

The grace and truth of our Glorious Father, through Jesus Christ, by the Holy Spirit, be to your hearts and works strength, courage, success, shalom, amen.

[Lexinom]

As a friend of mine likes to say, words mean things. I hope to get a copy of this book our FRiends have put together. From the excerpt it looks like a well-written work.

[Lexinom]

Evidently Laplace believed that once the human mind was freed of superstition, then human knowledge could become exact, “objective,” and thus certain. Yet in order for there to be “certainty” of human knowledge, it would be necessary for the human observer to magically detach himself from his necessary condition as part and participant in the universal whole, so to find some “Archimedean point” outside the universe from which to view the totality of all that exists as if he were completely independent of it. In effect such an observer, or “intelligence,” would have to escape the constraints of four-dimensional space-time entirely in order to occupy such a vantage point.

The atheist commits the fallacy of pretended neutrality. He is blind to his own "superstitions." An excellent audio debate many years ago took place between Dr. Greg Bahnsen and Dr. Gordon Stein - both now having gone on to their respective rewards. Bahnsen calls Stein on this fallacy, and shows how God's existence is not subject to scientific inquiry but rather prequisiste thereto.

Many a time I've debated other FReepers on CREVO threads and challenged them to give a basis for the transcendental truth on which their systems rest. The typcial response is "It just is!", or "Everybody knows that!" IOW they have none. They've simply substituted a rational basis for such truth (God) with an irrational one (truth existing in a vacuum with no ultimate purpose).

I look forward to finding and reading a copy of this work you've put together.