Posted on 11/08/2006 2:40:04 PM PST by Tarkus2040
they were buddies way before that, starting with the big Tsunami in Indonesia a couple of years back.
Well, I've said it before; I could write a post a mile long about all the great, conservative thoughts and sayings of Mike, but what's the point.
Checkers doesn't like Mike, and he's here to bash him.(and us)
Way before, couple years, I was close.
Here's what Rush said today...
"The way I feel is this: I feel liberated, and I'm going to tell you as plainly as I can why. I no longer am going to have to carry the water for people who I don't think deserve having their water carried. Now, you might say, "Well, why have you been doing it?" Because the stakes are high. Even though the Republican Party let us down, to me they represent a far better future for my beliefs and therefore the country's than the Democrat Party and liberalism does."
It's linked of Drudge.
Not only is Checkers right about weiner, but the savage prototype of attempting to make conservatives look like raving idiots is being employed by a lot of phonies right here.
Checkers is right about nothing.
Checkers is full of himself.
Checkers is having a grand old time of blaming Mike for the GOP's problems.
Checkers is stalemated.
What happened to KSFO? doesn't he broadcast from there any more?
You are correct, handing over our ports to the muslims in Dubai was really a Grand idea. Why Savage complaining about that was way outa line. What time will Checkers King O Sheeple be attending your sheeple meeting tomorrow??
He went to KNEW, got more money.
I think our troll FRiends are pissed off cause they believed we'd all be gloating over the Repubs losing control of the House.
Weiner went further. He posited that Bush "threw the election for the dems" so the dems could control Congress and he could get his agenda passed. Incredibly stupid statement even for Weiner to make.
In my humble opinion, your Mike is simply a version of the vehicle liberal, progressive, socialists/communist ratz are driving to split the right. Just like the California ilk herd and the fifth columnists here at FR, they will say anything intolerant, controversial, irritating or angering, anything to cause division. Impotent rants are rather pathetic and do little to garner sympathy, empathy or support. Au contraire, they discourage these things.
This is a trick the California ilk herd uses frequently. Pick a single issue to distort in able to divide. Kinda transparent.
Yep, the "stay at home conservatives" saw the GOP for what it truly is, and the amnesty bill was the last straw. I honestly thought about not voting as well, but here in liberal Rock Island County, Illinois, I had to get out and vote Republican. Especially since a few of the Repub candidates here in the 17th District were saying things I strongly agree with or took guts to say, such as this:
http://www.andrealanezinga.com/pdf/news/091406_Zinga_dispatch.pdf
Don't thank us, Thank Bush and Rove.
They deserve all the credit for open borders, out of control spending, Dubia Ports, Harriet Miers and a terrible occupation strategy. i.e letting al Mookie Sadr.
Please give credit where credit is due.
Greetings Fellow Infidel Targus.
Look at post 110 with the transcripts of Pres. Bush's remarks today and tell me with a straight face what you would call it!
The GOP and their ardent supporters (like Rush) got the shock of their lives today. I just hope our country isn't doomed to burn as badly as this guy.
I am sure Savage will be flattered. Not that he wanted the Democrats to win, but that you think he is SO POWERFUL.
Savage does not Set Policy. He gives his opinion on Policy.
Bush and Rove Set the Policies in motion that caused this disaster.
Future Gop candadates won't be running on the Bush/Rove doctrine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.