The Rumor about John Paul Stevens

Human Events Online ^ | November 4, 2006 | Sean Rushton

[TexasPatriot8]

Yes true. I was just trying to be "conservative". ;)

[Plutarch]

One needn't rely on rumors for the impending retirement of Judge Stevens. A glance at an acturial table provides sufficient proof.

[thingumbob]

No argument with you there.

[PDR]

the next seat goes to alberto gonzales - regardless of who leaves the court.

[loveliberty2]

Again, Republicans should have made this election about the need to be able to add conservative judges during this President's last two years in office! That they have not done so is regrettable. NRO's late article on the subject is too little, too late.

The liberty of future generations, and matters of fundamental importance to our national security require judges who interpret the law in accordance with the intentions of the Founders. The most sacred of all founding principles is summed up by Jefferson:

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."

Liberal judges do not protect that principle.

[ConservativeGadfly]

Let's hope not.

[ConservativeGadfly]

Believe me, I know. We could truly regret not making it an issue.

[TexasPatriot8]

BTTT!!!